RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
I can now understand why you have a problem incomprehension.
IF you read it again, you'll see that, by definition, the Arab Palestinians cannot be the victim of aggression because they are NOT a state.
Aggression would be the use of the IDF against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of the State of Palestine IF and Only IF Palestine has established sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence as a State.
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fdata%2Fattachments%2F286%2F286879-b262c7eacfc12a37ab1e2af925dc5324.jpg&hash=9bf761b8a15547310db8cfb4484ba40e)
Most Respectfully,
R
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
I can now understand why you have a problem incomprehension.
"Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State: (A/RES/3314 XXIX) Resolution 3314 is NOT a law. It is a signal concept dictionary. Hence it's named/title is Definition of Aggression."
IF you read it again, you'll see that, by definition, the Arab Palestinians cannot be the victim of aggression because they are NOT a state.
(COMMENT)Are you saying that the Palestinians cannot be aggressive because they are not a state.Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State:
Aggression would be the use of the IDF against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of the State of Palestine IF and Only IF Palestine has established sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence as a State.
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fdata%2Fattachments%2F286%2F286879-b262c7eacfc12a37ab1e2af925dc5324.jpg&hash=9bf761b8a15547310db8cfb4484ba40e)
Most Respectfully,
R