Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no he doesn't. more garbage.Did they say the same about Reagan's tax cuts, which brought more money into the treasury?
Republicans said deficits don't matter when Reagan did that. You only claim they do when a Democrat is president. Hypocrite.
Hmmm, that may be because Democrat president go ficken nuts with the deficit...Obama would be a prime example.
In 2009 , 4 months before Obama's presidency began, the deficit was 9.8% of GDP. In 2016, his last year, the deficit was 3.2% of the GDP.
Is that right. Gotta link for that?
Did they say the same about Reagan's tax cuts, which brought more money into the treasury?They don't get anything from the government. Nothing. what are you talking about? tell me how the rich become a burden on the government when there is a tax cut?So you are a Net Drain on The Economy and our Tax Revenue?
Or do you actually make a legitimate income and pay taxes?
Maybe you are being cute and have a "career"?
I doubt that, but entertain us as to your motivations as to hating tax cutes and bonuses for people that work hard for their money.
If you work hard and save your money, you might be able to retire some day too. That's getting harder to do when we keep giving unneeded permanent tax breaks to the super rich, and temporary crumbs to the working people.
Senate Republicans approve budget with $1.5-trillion deficit to pay for Trump's tax cuts
View attachment 174525
Republicans said deficits don't matter when Reagan did that. You only claim they do when a Democrat is president. Hypocrite.[/QUOTE
Actually what is funny is liberals bitched about Bush's spending, and I admit he spent too much. But you were silent on Obama doubling what Bush spent. Now we have a proposed spending bill. So let's see what the economy and our infrastructure looks like. If he spends like Obama and if he has nothing to show for it, like Obama. Then he will be considered a bad president, like Obama.
/----/ SHOULD Nncy be declared incompetent and forced to step down? I hope not BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Pelosi Acknowledges People Are Angry Over 'Crumbs' Comments -- So She TRIPLED DOWN
'Rep. Nancy Pelosi again referred to worker bonuses as “crumbs,” even while acknowledging that people have been mocking her for her out-of-touch comments.'
Hey, Nancy...get ready for EVEN MORE mocking.....
Bwuhahahaha.....
The ONLY 'people' who are pissed about the bonuses, raises, new jobs being created, and $1,000 more of their own dollars in their pockets are LIBERALS!
(That sound you hear are the sounds of the Democrat's chances during the Mid-Term elections plunging to their deaths every time this insane America-Hater opens her mouth.)
And how much drd we get from Obama? Hope that lead to hopelessness!Yes It’s crumbs . A distraction away from what the tax bill is really doing .
You get an extra $50 in your check , while trust fund Kid lucks our because they raised the estate tax exemption from $11mill to $22 mill!
You got steady growth, steady employment improvement, AND a declining deficit.
Did they say the same about Reagan's tax cuts, which brought more money into the treasury?They don't get anything from the government. Nothing. what are you talking about? tell me how the rich become a burden on the government when there is a tax cut?If you work hard and save your money, you might be able to retire some day too. That's getting harder to do when we keep giving unneeded permanent tax breaks to the super rich, and temporary crumbs to the working people.
Senate Republicans approve budget with $1.5-trillion deficit to pay for Trump's tax cuts
View attachment 174525
Republicans said deficits don't matter when Reagan did that. You only claim they do when a Democrat is president. Hypocrite.[/QUOTE
Actually what is funny is liberals bitched about Bush's spending, and I admit he spent too much. But you were silent on Obama doubling what Bush spent. Now we have a proposed spending bill. So let's see what the economy and our infrastructure looks like. If he spends like Obama and if he has nothing to show for it, like Obama. Then he will be considered a bad president, like Obama.
that about sums it up!Did they say the same about Reagan's tax cuts, which brought more money into the treasury?They don't get anything from the government. Nothing. what are you talking about? tell me how the rich become a burden on the government when there is a tax cut?
Senate Republicans approve budget with $1.5-trillion deficit to pay for Trump's tax cuts
View attachment 174525
Republicans said deficits don't matter when Reagan did that. You only claim they do when a Democrat is president. Hypocrite.[/QUOTE
Actually what is funny is liberals bitched about Bush's spending, and I admit he spent too much. But you were silent on Obama doubling what Bush spent. Now we have a proposed spending bill. So let's see what the economy and our infrastructure looks like. If he spends like Obama and if he has nothing to show for it, like Obama. Then he will be considered a bad president, like Obama.
You think stopping the fall from Bush's economy crash and saving the auto industry in the U.S. is nothing?
/——/ Yes, you’re grasping at straws.Did they say the same about Reagan's tax cuts, which brought more money into the treasury?They don't get anything from the government. Nothing. what are you talking about? tell me how the rich become a burden on the government when there is a tax cut?
Senate Republicans approve budget with $1.5-trillion deficit to pay for Trump's tax cuts
View attachment 174525
Republicans said deficits don't matter when Reagan did that. You only claim they do when a Democrat is president. Hypocrite.[/QUOTE
Actually what is funny is liberals bitched about Bush's spending, and I admit he spent too much. But you were silent on Obama doubling what Bush spent. Now we have a proposed spending bill. So let's see what the economy and our infrastructure looks like. If he spends like Obama and if he has nothing to show for it, like Obama. Then he will be considered a bad president, like Obama.
You think stopping the fall from Bush's economy crash and saving the auto industry in the U.S. is nothing?
