Planned Parenthood Staffers Talk About Ripping Out Babies Body Parts Joke About Eyeballs Rolling Out

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Abortion is not for the squeamish. Brutal - but necessary.

No...not necessary. The only need is if caring the baby to term would actually kill the mother...and then it is the mothers choice...any other reason is murder........pure and simple....

So should the law give women who have abortions the death penalty?

It would make sense since they call it murder...that would be pre-meditated then.

Absolutely but 99% of them don't believe that, which means that they don't really believe that abortion is the crime of murder.

 

[Votto]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

Neither did blacks at one time

 

[NLT]

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

If it has a heart beat it is human and alive...douche bag

 

[Votto]

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Right, we have no rights until we are human, and we are not human until the birth fairy waves her magic wand over us when we exit the birth canal.

It's all so common sense.

If you think we're ever going to give women the death penalty for using the morning after pill, you're the one in fairytale land.

They can't even give Charlie Manson the death penalty dolt.

Come to think of it, I read a story a while back of a college student giving birth and then killing her infant and sticking in a dumpster.

I reckon you don't think she should have the death penalty either, right?

 

[Chuz Life]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

I don't read or see sigs. And fetuses don't have constitutional rights. They have the rights of a tuna sandwich. Whether they live or die isn't up to you.

IX
The (anti-abortion) appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the (pro-abortion) appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the (14th) Amendment. The appellant conceded as much on reargument. - Roe v. Wade

 

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

Neither did blacks at one time

So? You honestly believe that the 'abortion is murder' claim is someday going to be constitutionally established?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

I don't read or see sigs. And fetuses don't have constitutional rights. They have the rights of a tuna sandwich. Whether they live or die isn't up to you.

IX
The (anti-abortion) appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the (pro-abortion) appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the (14th) Amendment. The appellant conceded as much on reargument. - Roe v. Wade

The world of constitutional/case law dissension is filled with opinions like that. so what?

 

[Chuz Life]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Interesting to see libtarded denials and coping systems working simultaneously in real time. I'll be saving this thread for reference - for the next time I see libtardz talking about how much they care about children.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

No?

Then explain how a person can be (and many have been) charged with MURDER for killing one.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Roe v Wade was decided 7 to 2, and even the dissenters did not argue that the fetus had 'personhood' rights.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses aren't children. They aren't even babies. And newborns are neonates. They aren't babies either. We have different names for different things.

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

No?

Then explain how a person can be (and many have been) charged with MURDER for killing one.

That has nothing to do with a fetus having constitutional rights. That has to do with Roe v Wade leaving later term abortion questions up to the states.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Right, we have no rights until we are human, and we are not human until the birth fairy waves her magic wand over us when we exit the birth canal.

It's all so common sense.

If you think we're ever going to give women the death penalty for using the morning after pill, you're the one in fairytale land.

They can't even give Charlie Manson the death penalty dolt.

Come to think of it, I read a story a while back of a college student giving birth and then killing her infant and sticking in a dumpster.

I reckon you don't think she should have the death penalty either, right?

Now you're trying to argue that the death penalty is no longer legal?

 

[Chuz Life]

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

Neither did blacks at one time

So? You honestly believe that the 'abortion is murder' claim is someday going to be constitutionally established?

Try to keep up.

It ALREADY is established in more ways than one.

The problem is that those same laws (for now) make and exception for women who choose to have one "legally."


However, if YOU attack a woman and kill her child (abort it) "CRIMINALLY. . . "

YOU will be charged with MURDER.

So, for as long as even an illegal abortion is recognized as a murder.... The comment "abortion is murder" is in fact true. It doesn't have to mean that ALL abortions are murder. If even one abortion is a murder, the premise is established.

Exceptions are not the rule. That's why they are called "exceptions."

 

[Chuz Life]

Your denials have already been defeated REPEATEDLY by the passing of over several dozens of fetal HOMICIDE laws which LEGALLY DEFINE a child in the womb as CHILDREN.

I'LL BUY YOUR DENIAL BULLSHIT WHEN YOU SUCCEED IN OVERTURNING ALL OF THOSE LAWS.

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

No?

Then explain how a person can be (and many have been) charged with MURDER for killing one.

That has nothing to do with a fetus having constitutional rights. That has to do with Roe v Wade leaving later term abortion questions up to the states.

Bullshit.

The FEDERAL law says specifically - that anyone who kills a "child in the womb" in ANY stage of development during a criminal act - is guilty of MURDER.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Fetuses are not children. If they were, the Constitution as it's written would give them equal rights.

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Right, we have no rights until we are human, and we are not human until the birth fairy waves her magic wand over us when we exit the birth canal.

It's all so common sense.

If you think we're ever going to give women the death penalty for using the morning after pill, you're the one in fairytale land.

They can't even give Charlie Manson the death penalty dolt.

Come to think of it, I read a story a while back of a college student giving birth and then killing her infant and sticking in a dumpster.

I reckon you don't think she should have the death penalty either, right?

Women on death row for killing their children:
Patricia Blackmon was 29 years old when she killed her 2-year-old adopted daughter in Dothan, AL in May 1999.

Kenisha Berry at age 20, covered her 4-day-old son with duct tape resulting in his death.

Debra Jean Milke was 25 when she killed her 4-year-old son in Arizona in 1989.

Dora Luz Durenrostro killed her two daughters, age 4 and 9, and her son, age 8 when she was 34 years old in San Jacinto, California in 1994.

Caro Socorro was 42 years old when she killed her three sons, ages 5, 8 and 11, in Santa Rosa Valley, California in 1999.

Susan Eubanks murdered her four sons, ages 4, 6, 7 and 14, in San Marcos, California, in 1996 when she was 33.

Caroline Young was 49 in Haywood, California when she killed her 4-year-old granddaughter and 6-year-old grandson.

Robin Lee Row was 35 years old when she killed her husband, her 10-year-old son and her 8-year-old daughter in Boise, Idaho in 1992.

Michelle Sue Tharp was 29 years old in Burgettstown, Pennsylvania when she killed her 7-year-old daughter.

Frances Elaine Newton was 21 when she murdered her husband, 7-year-old son and 2-year-old daughter in Houston, Texas. Update: Frances Elaine Newton was executed on September 14, 2005.

Darlie Lynn Routier was 26 in Rowlett, Texas when she was convicted of killing her 5-year-old son.

Mothers Who Kill Their Children

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

Neither did blacks at one time

So? You honestly believe that the 'abortion is murder' claim is someday going to be constitutionally established?

Try to keep up.

It ALREADY is established in more ways than one.

The problem is that those same laws (for now) make and exception for women who choose to have one "legally."


However, if YOU attack a woman and kill her child (abort it) "CRIMINALLY. . . "

YOU will be charged with MURDER.

So, for as long as even an illegal abortion is recognized as a murder.... The comment "abortion is murder" is in fact true. It doesn't have to mean that ALL abortions are murder. If even one abortion is a murder, the premise is established.

Exceptions are not the rule. That's why they are called "exceptions."

You're an idiot. When anti-abortion nuts scream 'abortion is murder' they are not referring to some rare exception-to-the-rule particular circumstance.

Cut the baloney

 

[koshergrl]

Plessy v. Ferguson was also "settled Law" as was Dredd Scott......good to know you support those racist Supreme Court decisions....

MAKING FAKE VIDEO'S HAS IT'S CONSEQUENCES. -like what happened in Colorado Springs last year where 1 police officer with 3 kids at home was killed along with two other innocent people--when a nutcase went after a Planned Parenthood office there because of the Fake baby video's.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html

Now out of all the women YOU claim that have abortions each and every year--I find it very odd that you can't drag up one single woman that will state that taxpayer dollars paid for hers?

In fact a Democrat legislator in Texas decided to write her own bill--recently. Men are to be fined $100.00 for masterbation.

"A Texas lawmaker has proposed a bill that would fine a man $100 each time he masturbates.
The bill also imposes a 24-hour waiting period if a guy wants a colonoscopy or a vasectomy, or if he's in the market for some Viagra.
Rep. Jessica Farrar, a Democrat, knows her bill isn't going to get very far. But she proposed it last week to make a point and give male lawmakers a taste of their own medicine.
Farrar has long been an advocate of women's health in a state that has made it extremely difficult for women to get abortions. And the bill, by pointing out a sexist double standard, is meant to shine a light on the obstacles women deal with when it comes to their health care.
"Let's look at what Texas has done to women," Farrar told CNN. "What if men had to undergo the same intrusive procedures?"
Texas bill would fine men $100 each time they masturbate - CNN.com

Recently a Bush 1 Federal district court Judge in Texas was interviewed and stated he is tired of seeing all these abortion bills that he is continually having to overrule. When asked why he thought he got so many--he stated that it's because most Republican state legilators are men, and really have NO business interfering into Women's issues.

Mike Pence has the same issues--signing a state abortion bill into law that was immediately overturned by a Federal District Court. It's really a waste of taxpayer dollars and could easily result in class action law suits that the taxpayers would end up on the hook for.
Pence signs new abortion restrictions into law with a prayer
Federal Judge Blocks Pence's "Extreme" Anti-Abortion Indiana Law

Amazing how the left feel the need to make up outlandish lies just so they can yank the limbs off of babies.

It's not the left who's lying here. These people were arrested for this lie and a good police officer killed.

Just like the Pizzagate shooting, only in this case someone died unnecessarily.

The filmmakers have been arrested and face 15 felony counts. Their video was heavily edited. The original questions and answers were cut to make it appear that they were talking about selling baby parts.

These people are rabid anti abortion crusaders who have no morals and feel that any low act is acceptable if they can stop abortions.

I hope they go to a nice federal prison where they are raped repeatedly.

You can pretend it is all a lie. At least your willingness to create a fantasy scenario to deny reality shows you have some humanity left in you.

But fact remains. Tens of thousands of babies will be killed by having their limbs ripped off this week. And studies show, they feel it.

Bullshit

Women do not use abortion as a common contraceptive. Not when they're paying out $1500.00 to $1800.00 to have an abortion.

Taxpayer dollars cannot be used for abortions: Proof of that: I find it astounding that out of all the abortions you claim happen each & every year that you have yet to come up with one single woman that will state that hers was paid for by the taxpayers.

Federal funding is for poor women--who can use Planned parenthood for pap smears and physicals--at reduced costs--can get referred out for mammograms--and for reduced costs on birth control contraceptives. You know those things that prevent abortions. In the Republican Health care bill (that won't make it through the senate anyway) they have cut funding for Planned Parenthood for one year--meaning if it were to pass the result would be more abortions.

Niel Gorsuch--Trump's pick for SCOTUS just stated that Roe v Wade is here to stay. Get over it!
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

You have pissed off a lot of women in this country--and that is more than evident with the massive protest the day after Trump was inaugurated.

They were in the millions and this was going on in every state across this country. For more pictures go to this link
Woman's march pictures

More lies. Just like the lies about the *fake* footage of PP ghouls cackling over chopping up babies and women, and making money off it.

Like the photoshopped pics, btw. Those are awesome.

Abortions don't cost 1500-1800, unless they are illegal late term abortions, like the ones Gosnell provided. You pay a lot for murder, it's a fact of life.

And despite PP's lies to the contrary, yes, medicaid does fund abortions...because the clinics LIE about what they do. They commit fraud to get the money from the government. That's what all the "breast exam" and "birth control" and "female health" services that they claim they provide, but really don't, is about.

"A Planned Parenthood affiliate in Texas knowingly sent in about $6 million in false claims to Medicaid and took steps to cover up its acts.."

"Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast submitted more than 87,000 reimbursement claims for services that were “false, fraudulent, and/or ineligible,” said the lawsuit filed by Abby K. Johnson on behalf of the United States and the state of Texas in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Houston."
Planned Parenthood accused of $6M fraud

They settled right fucking fast, too. Why not, they get money from the state, AND from the poor girls they butcher:

Planned Parenthood Settles in Fraud Case

"Planned Parenthood staffers routinely purchased birth control pills for just under $3, billed Medicaid $35 for the same package of pills, and got reimbursed for $26."

Planned Parenthood Paid $3 For Birth Control

"“Medicaid providers, particularly nonprofits, usually don’t make money off their Medicaid patients,” Mattox said in an email to The Daily Signal. “But Planned Parenthood is unlike most nonprofit Medicaid providers in that its own annual reports show $127 million in profit last year and $765 million profit over the last decade.”

 

[koshergrl]

You mean children don't have equal rights as well under the Constitution, like voting and being able to marry dolt?

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Right, we have no rights until we are human, and we are not human until the birth fairy waves her magic wand over us when we exit the birth canal.

It's all so common sense.

If you think we're ever going to give women the death penalty for using the morning after pill, you're the one in fairytale land.

They can't even give Charlie Manson the death penalty dolt.

Come to think of it, I read a story a while back of a college student giving birth and then killing her infant and sticking in a dumpster.

I reckon you don't think she should have the death penalty either, right?

Women on death row for killing their children:
Patricia Blackmon was 29 years old when she killed her 2-year-old adopted daughter in Dothan, AL in May 1999.

Kenisha Berry at age 20, covered her 4-day-old son with duct tape resulting in his death.

Debra Jean Milke was 25 when she killed her 4-year-old son in Arizona in 1989.

Dora Luz Durenrostro killed her two daughters, age 4 and 9, and her son, age 8 when she was 34 years old in San Jacinto, California in 1994.

Caro Socorro was 42 years old when she killed her three sons, ages 5, 8 and 11, in Santa Rosa Valley, California in 1999.

Susan Eubanks murdered her four sons, ages 4, 6, 7 and 14, in San Marcos, California, in 1996 when she was 33.

Caroline Young was 49 in Haywood, California when she killed her 4-year-old granddaughter and 6-year-old grandson.

Robin Lee Row was 35 years old when she killed her husband, her 10-year-old son and her 8-year-old daughter in Boise, Idaho in 1992.

Michelle Sue Tharp was 29 years old in Burgettstown, Pennsylvania when she killed her 7-year-old daughter.

Frances Elaine Newton was 21 when she murdered her husband, 7-year-old son and 2-year-old daughter in Houston, Texas. Update: Frances Elaine Newton was executed on September 14, 2005.

Darlie Lynn Routier was 26 in Rowlett, Texas when she was convicted of killing her 5-year-old son.

Mothers Who Kill Their Children

Do you have a point?

No, you do not. Except that you are really interested in ways people kill children.....

 

[BlindBoo]

Bad laws cannot be helped but that doesn't change the facts. The laws were passed by anti-abortion idiots - like you.

Neither marriage nor voting are specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As with abortion and privacy, the right is implied.

Read my signature.


Show me where any person has the Constitutional right to violate the rights of another.

Fetuses don't have constitutional rights.

No?

Then explain how a person can be (and many have been) charged with MURDER for killing one.

That has nothing to do with a fetus having constitutional rights. That has to do with Roe v Wade leaving later term abortion questions up to the states.

Bullshit.

The FEDERAL law says specifically - that anyone who kills a "child in the womb" in ANY stage of development during a criminal act - is guilty of MURDER.

Wow yeah that's true except abortions are not criminal acts and are specifically excluded.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The left stand for gruesome death on every issue, whether it is killing babies or defending Islamofascism.
Pure evil.

Link?

And proof that it's real and not just another RWNJ lie.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com