🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

POLITICO stands by its story on Carson's West Point claims

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
166,546
90,887
Editor’s note: POLITICO stands by its reporting on this story, which has been updated to reflect Ben Carson’s on the record response. The original story and headline said that Carson’s campaign had admitted he"fabricated" a "full scholarship" from West Point, but now Carson denies that his campaign’s statement constituted such an admission, and the story and headline were changed to reflect that. POLITICO’s reporting established that Carson said he received a "full scholarship" from West Point, in writing and in public appearances over the years — but in fact he did not and there is actually no such thing as a "full scholarship" to the taxpayer-funded academy. And today in response to POLITICO he acknowledged for the first time that was not the case. Carson never explicitly wrote that he had applied for admission to West Point, although that was the clear implication of his claim to have received an offer of a "full scholarship," a point that POLITICO’s initial report should have made clear.

Read more: Exclusive: Carson claimed West Point 'scholarship' but never applied - POLITICO

Politico has merely updated its story to reflect new information - but stands by its original story.
 
Don't ever hit your mother with a hammer. It leaves a dull impression on her mind.

Oh, and don't stab your friends.
 
Editor’s note: POLITICO stands by its reporting on this story, which has been updated to reflect Ben Carson’s on the record response. The original story and headline said that Carson’s campaign had admitted he"fabricated" a "full scholarship" from West Point, but now Carson denies that his campaign’s statement constituted such an admission, and the story and headline were changed to reflect that. POLITICO’s reporting established that Carson said he received a "full scholarship" from West Point, in writing and in public appearances over the years — but in fact he did not and there is actually no such thing as a "full scholarship" to the taxpayer-funded academy. And today in response to POLITICO he acknowledged for the first time that was not the case. Carson never explicitly wrote that he had applied for admission to West Point, although that was the clear implication of his claim to have received an offer of a "full scholarship," a point that POLITICO’s initial report should have made clear.

Read more: Exclusive: Carson claimed West Point 'scholarship' but never applied - POLITICO

Politico has merely updated its story to reflect new information - but stands by its original story.

To listen to the conservatives who are defending Carson, merely reading an ad about scholarships to West Point constitutes being offered that scholarship.
 
Editor’s note: POLITICO stands by its reporting on this story, which has been updated to reflect Ben Carson’s on the record response. The original story and headline said that Carson’s campaign had admitted he"fabricated" a "full scholarship" from West Point, but now Carson denies that his campaign’s statement constituted such an admission, and the story and headline were changed to reflect that. POLITICO’s reporting established that Carson said he received a "full scholarship" from West Point, in writing and in public appearances over the years — but in fact he did not and there is actually no such thing as a "full scholarship" to the taxpayer-funded academy. And today in response to POLITICO he acknowledged for the first time that was not the case. Carson never explicitly wrote that he had applied for admission to West Point, although that was the clear implication of his claim to have received an offer of a "full scholarship," a point that POLITICO’s initial report should have made clear.

Read more: Exclusive: Carson claimed West Point 'scholarship' but never applied - POLITICO

Politico has merely updated its story to reflect new information - but stands by its original story.

To listen to the conservatives who are defending Carson, merely reading an ad about scholarships to West Point constitutes being offered that scholarship.
On the most part I don't think it's that, I think it's the piling on when there was not even a peep by the progressive media over Hildabeasts sniper fire in war zone lie??
 
The bottom line is Carson isn't qualified to be president – his response to this and other reporting concerning inconsistencies in his past demonstrate that.
 
The bottom line is Carson isn't qualified to be president – his response to this and other reporting concerning inconsistencies in his past demonstrate that.
Maybe so, the same could be said for any career politician. Hildabeast
 
Alex Haley, Lance Armstrong - and now Ben Carson. Interesting...
 
NaziCons seem to have backed off bashing POLITICO. Why is that?
 
The bottom line is Carson isn't qualified to be president – his response to this and other reporting concerning inconsistencies in his past demonstrate that.

This is an incredible statement from the board moron.

Just what qualifies you to be president ? Specifics please.

We'll hold everyone to your criteria.....

Unless you include "got federal employees killed" as one of them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top