Poll: 2/3 of Americans Would Defy Federal Gun Ban

The issue is making shit up. Of course that issue went right over your head.

So you can't grasp my point, and do a one line retort.

Negged for being a bush(har)-league wanna be troll

The whole issue of taking people's guns is stupid. This is the gun capital of the world, idiot!

I can't neg ya today, I already did.

No, you didnt. but feel free to hit me with your piddling 17 (oh wait now 14, lol) rep.

The issue is what the grabbers are proposing is the first step towards restricting certain guns to previous owners, which if the first step in "taking"

If you can't fathom that, I suggest you go talk to your current hippie college professor (who's probably the source of your piddly intellect) and have him give you a refersher in debating.
 
So you can't grasp my point, and do a one line retort.

Negged for being a bush(har)-league wanna be troll

The whole issue of taking people's guns is stupid. This is the gun capital of the world, idiot!

I can't neg ya today, I already did.

No, you didnt. but feel free to hit me with your piddling 17 (oh wait now 14, lol) rep.

The issue is what the grabbers are proposing is the first step towards restricting certain guns to previous owners, which if the first step in "taking"

If you can't fathom that, I suggest you go talk to your current hippie college professor (who's probably the source of your piddly intellect) and have him give you a refersher in debating.

I can fathom that even the NY ban on assault weapons didn't apply to people who had assault weapons. Where are the specific examples to back your claims?
 
Poll: 2/3 of Americans Would Defy Federal Gun Ban​





by Tony Lee
25 Jan 2013

In a Fox News survey, two-thirds of Americans said they would "defy" a federal gun ban and keep their guns if the government ever passed a law to "take your guns."

The survey asked respondents, "If the government passed a law to take your guns, would you give up your guns or defy the law and keep your guns?"

Sixty-five percent of those surveyed said they would "defy the law." Specifically, 70% of Republicans, 68% of conservatives, 52% of Democrats, and 59% of liberals said they would "defy" a federal gun ban to keep their guns.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
Poll: 2/3 of Americans Would Defy Federal Gun Ban

The numbers would be even higher if the survey asked respondents what they would do if the gov't passed a law to take away their porn.
 
The whole issue of taking people's guns is stupid. This is the gun capital of the world, idiot!

I can't neg ya today, I already did.

No, you didnt. but feel free to hit me with your piddling 17 (oh wait now 14, lol) rep.

The issue is what the grabbers are proposing is the first step towards restricting certain guns to previous owners, which if the first step in "taking"

If you can't fathom that, I suggest you go talk to your current hippie college professor (who's probably the source of your piddly intellect) and have him give you a refersher in debating.

I can fathom that even the NY ban on assault weapons didn't apply to people who had assault weapons. Where are the specific examples to back your claims?

First, an assault weapon is not a real gun classification. We are talking about semi automatic rifles. Second, there is a whole list now "banned" from sale or possesion, unless you already own it. Thus those guns are now "BANNED" from me owning them, as I did not own them before the law went into effect. This also applies to alot of semi automatic pistols, which I am now BANNED from owning, despite me having a clean record, which other grandfathered in legal owners have as well.

Next, you have to either turn in or sell out of state every magazine over 7 rounds. If the gun you have came with and is desgined for a magazine over 7 rounds, you now have to find a guy to fabricate you a 7 round mag, or young gun is now effectively a crappy club.

This is not going house to house grabbing the guns, but my makeing them unusable legally, you HAVE effecitvely confiscated it, if the person does not want to break the law.

And THIS is why gun owners and gun rights supporters hate gun grabbing bastards, because they keep trying end run shit. Mostly because they know what they really want (gun confiscation by force) is unworkable, AT THE CURRENT TIME.

How are we supposed to trust people who want more gun control, when they lie about the extent they want to take gun control, and they do this end run bullshit all the time?
 
No, you didnt. but feel free to hit me with your piddling 17 (oh wait now 14, lol) rep.

The issue is what the grabbers are proposing is the first step towards restricting certain guns to previous owners, which if the first step in "taking"

If you can't fathom that, I suggest you go talk to your current hippie college professor (who's probably the source of your piddly intellect) and have him give you a refersher in debating.

I can fathom that even the NY ban on assault weapons didn't apply to people who had assault weapons. Where are the specific examples to back your claims?

First, an assault weapon is not a real gun classification. We are talking about semi automatic rifles. Second, there is a whole list now "banned" from sale or possesion, unless you already own it. Thus those guns are now "BANNED" from me owning them, as I did not own them before the law went into effect. This also applies to alot of semi automatic pistols, which I am now BANNED from owning, despite me having a clean record, which other grandfathered in legal owners have as well.

Next, you have to either turn in or sell out of state every magazine over 7 rounds. If the gun you have came with and is desgined for a magazine over 7 rounds, you now have to find a guy to fabricate you a 7 round mag, or young gun is now effectively a crappy club.

This is not going house to house grabbing the guns, but my makeing them unusable legally, you HAVE effecitvely confiscated it, if the person does not want to break the law.

And THIS is why gun owners and gun rights supporters hate gun grabbing bastards, because they keep trying end run shit. Mostly because they know what they really want (gun confiscation by force) is unworkable, AT THE CURRENT TIME.

How are we supposed to trust people who want more gun control, when they lie about the extent they want to take gun control, and they do this end run bullshit all the time?

It's your choice to live in NY. It was your choice to oppose all changes to gun laws, when the writing was written on the wall that the law would be changed. You gun nuts in NY took yourselves out of the picture by your position on gun laws, so don't come crying to me about the consequences of your decisions! I have yet to see proof of your claims about magazines and I'm certainly not going to take a gun nuts word about anything involving a gun. The reason is simply the gun nuts have lied so often, they can't be trusted about any detail related to guns.

I think the proposals I made about firearms were very reasonable to gun owners and were solely designed to remove weapons from criminals. Under my system when a society in a state wants to restrict a weapon or accessory, it would controlled as a Title II weapon that has a renewable registration to insure the same owner has possession of it. Under that you could have all the assault weapons and high capacity magazines your heart desires. My only interest is society prevents dangerous weaponry getting into the hands of a criminal and if you become a criminal, then society will prevent you from having weapons.
 
I can fathom that even the NY ban on assault weapons didn't apply to people who had assault weapons. Where are the specific examples to back your claims?

First, an assault weapon is not a real gun classification. We are talking about semi automatic rifles. Second, there is a whole list now "banned" from sale or possesion, unless you already own it. Thus those guns are now "BANNED" from me owning them, as I did not own them before the law went into effect. This also applies to alot of semi automatic pistols, which I am now BANNED from owning, despite me having a clean record, which other grandfathered in legal owners have as well.

Next, you have to either turn in or sell out of state every magazine over 7 rounds. If the gun you have came with and is desgined for a magazine over 7 rounds, you now have to find a guy to fabricate you a 7 round mag, or young gun is now effectively a crappy club.

This is not going house to house grabbing the guns, but my makeing them unusable legally, you HAVE effecitvely confiscated it, if the person does not want to break the law.

And THIS is why gun owners and gun rights supporters hate gun grabbing bastards, because they keep trying end run shit. Mostly because they know what they really want (gun confiscation by force) is unworkable, AT THE CURRENT TIME.

How are we supposed to trust people who want more gun control, when they lie about the extent they want to take gun control, and they do this end run bullshit all the time?

It's your choice to live in NY. It was your choice to oppose all changes to gun laws, when the writing was written on the wall that the law would be changed. You gun nuts in NY took yourselves out of the picture by your position on gun laws, so don't come crying to me about the consequences of your decisions! I have yet to see proof of your claims about magazines and I'm certainly not going to take a gun nuts word about anything involving a gun. The reason is simply the gun nuts have lied so often, they can't be trusted about any detail related to guns.

I think the proposals I made about firearms were very reasonable to gun owners and were solely designed to remove weapons from criminals. Under my system when a society in a state wants to restrict a weapon or accessory, it would controlled as a Title II weapon that has a renewable registration to insure the same owner has possession of it. Under that you could have all the assault weapons and high capacity magazines your heart desires. My only interest is society prevents dangerous weaponry getting into the hands of a criminal and if you become a criminal, then society will prevent you from having weapons.

Read the fucking law yourself. Or read analyses of it. Google is your friend. And I would LOVE to move out of NY, but I have family commitments.

Plus, dont go around saying gun owning new yorkers didnt want to even talk about "compromise" This law was passed in the middle of the night, with ZERO debate, and without the usual time it takes to craft said laws. Cuomo even admitted he did it this way as to prevent people from going out and buying the guns so they couldnt get grandfathered in.

You can try to turn the whole "YOU LIE" thing back on gun rights supporters, but the fact is it is YOUR SIDE trying to restrict peoples rights, because you are cowardly assholes scared of things that go "BANG." It is also your side that has to lie, and distort, such as linking autos and semi autos, using SCARY terms like assault rifle and assault weapon, and going for the back door chickenshit approach to restricting gun rights.

If you want the government to tell you how to live your life down to the second, go ahead. leave the rest of us out of it. You can die safe in your bed a coward if you want to, I dont.
 
First, an assault weapon is not a real gun classification. We are talking about semi automatic rifles. Second, there is a whole list now "banned" from sale or possesion, unless you already own it. Thus those guns are now "BANNED" from me owning them, as I did not own them before the law went into effect. This also applies to alot of semi automatic pistols, which I am now BANNED from owning, despite me having a clean record, which other grandfathered in legal owners have as well.

Next, you have to either turn in or sell out of state every magazine over 7 rounds. If the gun you have came with and is desgined for a magazine over 7 rounds, you now have to find a guy to fabricate you a 7 round mag, or young gun is now effectively a crappy club.

This is not going house to house grabbing the guns, but my makeing them unusable legally, you HAVE effecitvely confiscated it, if the person does not want to break the law.

And THIS is why gun owners and gun rights supporters hate gun grabbing bastards, because they keep trying end run shit. Mostly because they know what they really want (gun confiscation by force) is unworkable, AT THE CURRENT TIME.

How are we supposed to trust people who want more gun control, when they lie about the extent they want to take gun control, and they do this end run bullshit all the time?

It's your choice to live in NY. It was your choice to oppose all changes to gun laws, when the writing was written on the wall that the law would be changed. You gun nuts in NY took yourselves out of the picture by your position on gun laws, so don't come crying to me about the consequences of your decisions! I have yet to see proof of your claims about magazines and I'm certainly not going to take a gun nuts word about anything involving a gun. The reason is simply the gun nuts have lied so often, they can't be trusted about any detail related to guns.

I think the proposals I made about firearms were very reasonable to gun owners and were solely designed to remove weapons from criminals. Under my system when a society in a state wants to restrict a weapon or accessory, it would controlled as a Title II weapon that has a renewable registration to insure the same owner has possession of it. Under that you could have all the assault weapons and high capacity magazines your heart desires. My only interest is society prevents dangerous weaponry getting into the hands of a criminal and if you become a criminal, then society will prevent you from having weapons.

Read the fucking law yourself. Or read analyses of it. Google is your friend. And I would LOVE to move out of NY, but I have family commitments.

Plus, dont go around saying gun owning new yorkers didnt want to even talk about "compromise" This law was passed in the middle of the night, with ZERO debate, and without the usual time it takes to craft said laws. Cuomo even admitted he did it this way as to prevent people from going out and buying the guns so they couldnt get grandfathered in.

You can try to turn the whole "YOU LIE" thing back on gun rights supporters, but the fact is it is YOUR SIDE trying to restrict peoples rights, because you are cowardly assholes scared of things that go "BANG." It is also your side that has to lie, and distort, such as linking autos and semi autos, using SCARY terms like assault rifle and assault weapon, and going for the back door chickenshit approach to restricting gun rights.

If you want the government to tell you how to live your life down to the second, go ahead. leave the rest of us out of it. You can die safe in your bed a coward if you want to, I dont.

The newly imposed New York State Gun laws DO infringe upon the Constitution especially on the Second Amendment. I do not believe that the draconian law will be approved by SCOTUS. We can only wait for the trials to take place.
 
First, an assault weapon is not a real gun classification. We are talking about semi automatic rifles. Second, there is a whole list now "banned" from sale or possesion, unless you already own it. Thus those guns are now "BANNED" from me owning them, as I did not own them before the law went into effect. This also applies to alot of semi automatic pistols, which I am now BANNED from owning, despite me having a clean record, which other grandfathered in legal owners have as well.

Next, you have to either turn in or sell out of state every magazine over 7 rounds. If the gun you have came with and is desgined for a magazine over 7 rounds, you now have to find a guy to fabricate you a 7 round mag, or young gun is now effectively a crappy club.

This is not going house to house grabbing the guns, but my makeing them unusable legally, you HAVE effecitvely confiscated it, if the person does not want to break the law.

And THIS is why gun owners and gun rights supporters hate gun grabbing bastards, because they keep trying end run shit. Mostly because they know what they really want (gun confiscation by force) is unworkable, AT THE CURRENT TIME.

How are we supposed to trust people who want more gun control, when they lie about the extent they want to take gun control, and they do this end run bullshit all the time?

It's your choice to live in NY. It was your choice to oppose all changes to gun laws, when the writing was written on the wall that the law would be changed. You gun nuts in NY took yourselves out of the picture by your position on gun laws, so don't come crying to me about the consequences of your decisions! I have yet to see proof of your claims about magazines and I'm certainly not going to take a gun nuts word about anything involving a gun. The reason is simply the gun nuts have lied so often, they can't be trusted about any detail related to guns.

I think the proposals I made about firearms were very reasonable to gun owners and were solely designed to remove weapons from criminals. Under my system when a society in a state wants to restrict a weapon or accessory, it would controlled as a Title II weapon that has a renewable registration to insure the same owner has possession of it. Under that you could have all the assault weapons and high capacity magazines your heart desires. My only interest is society prevents dangerous weaponry getting into the hands of a criminal and if you become a criminal, then society will prevent you from having weapons.

Read the fucking law yourself. Or read analyses of it. Google is your friend. And I would LOVE to move out of NY, but I have family commitments.

Plus, dont go around saying gun owning new yorkers didnt want to even talk about "compromise" This law was passed in the middle of the night, with ZERO debate, and without the usual time it takes to craft said laws. Cuomo even admitted he did it this way as to prevent people from going out and buying the guns so they couldnt get grandfathered in.

You can try to turn the whole "YOU LIE" thing back on gun rights supporters, but the fact is it is YOUR SIDE trying to restrict peoples rights, because you are cowardly assholes scared of things that go "BANG." It is also your side that has to lie, and distort, such as linking autos and semi autos, using SCARY terms like assault rifle and assault weapon, and going for the back door chickenshit approach to restricting gun rights.

If you want the government to tell you how to live your life down to the second, go ahead. leave the rest of us out of it. You can die safe in your bed a coward if you want to, I dont.

My side was to not ban any gun, but gun nuts have behaved so much like assholes that it's understandable that no one would give them any consideration. Those are the consequences of being an asshole. Since you people want to be unreasonable, then a reasonable person isn't going to give you any consideration. Your rhetoric just makes people like me, who want law abiding citizens to have access to these weapons, to just say fuck you. Maybe you idiots haven't figured out yet how that dumbshit NRA propaganda has consequences and you are turning away a lot more people than you are attracting. Take a look at these gun nuts on this site! How many times have I been accused of wanting something I didn't want. Maybe you people are just too stupid to own a gun.
 
It's your choice to live in NY. It was your choice to oppose all changes to gun laws, when the writing was written on the wall that the law would be changed. You gun nuts in NY took yourselves out of the picture by your position on gun laws, so don't come crying to me about the consequences of your decisions! I have yet to see proof of your claims about magazines and I'm certainly not going to take a gun nuts word about anything involving a gun. The reason is simply the gun nuts have lied so often, they can't be trusted about any detail related to guns.

I think the proposals I made about firearms were very reasonable to gun owners and were solely designed to remove weapons from criminals. Under my system when a society in a state wants to restrict a weapon or accessory, it would controlled as a Title II weapon that has a renewable registration to insure the same owner has possession of it. Under that you could have all the assault weapons and high capacity magazines your heart desires. My only interest is society prevents dangerous weaponry getting into the hands of a criminal and if you become a criminal, then society will prevent you from having weapons.

Read the fucking law yourself. Or read analyses of it. Google is your friend. And I would LOVE to move out of NY, but I have family commitments.

Plus, dont go around saying gun owning new yorkers didnt want to even talk about "compromise" This law was passed in the middle of the night, with ZERO debate, and without the usual time it takes to craft said laws. Cuomo even admitted he did it this way as to prevent people from going out and buying the guns so they couldnt get grandfathered in.

You can try to turn the whole "YOU LIE" thing back on gun rights supporters, but the fact is it is YOUR SIDE trying to restrict peoples rights, because you are cowardly assholes scared of things that go "BANG." It is also your side that has to lie, and distort, such as linking autos and semi autos, using SCARY terms like assault rifle and assault weapon, and going for the back door chickenshit approach to restricting gun rights.

If you want the government to tell you how to live your life down to the second, go ahead. leave the rest of us out of it. You can die safe in your bed a coward if you want to, I dont.

My side was to not ban any gun, but gun nuts have behaved so much like assholes that it's understandable that no one would give them any consideration. Those are the consequences of being an asshole. Since you people want to be unreasonable, then a reasonable person isn't going to give you any consideration. Your rhetoric just makes people like me, who want law abiding citizens to have access to these weapons, to just say fuck you. Maybe you idiots haven't figured out yet how that dumbshit NRA propaganda has consequences and you are turning away a lot more people than you are attracting. Take a look at these gun nuts on this site! How many times have I been accused of wanting something I didn't want. Maybe you people are just too stupid to own a gun.

NOW you say you "dont want to ban any gun." But the next time someone uses one illegally in some massacre, I am sure you will call for bans, and the convinent registry will allow for the government to easily find them.

And us not believing a word you are saying is the consequence of you and your ilk being fucking liars.

And i find it comical being called an idiot by someone who thinks making law abdiding gun owners go through burecratic hoops will somehow make them safer from CRIMINALS who use guns ILLEGALLY. Thats true stupdity at its best. Its has been and always will be about control.



Y
 
Doesn't matter, because they're not taking your guns.

wankingwolven is fos....

from pew research:

1-14-13-12.png


In Gun Control Debate, Several Options Draw Majority Support | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
 
Read the fucking law yourself. Or read analyses of it. Google is your friend. And I would LOVE to move out of NY, but I have family commitments.

Plus, dont go around saying gun owning new yorkers didnt want to even talk about "compromise" This law was passed in the middle of the night, with ZERO debate, and without the usual time it takes to craft said laws. Cuomo even admitted he did it this way as to prevent people from going out and buying the guns so they couldnt get grandfathered in.

You can try to turn the whole "YOU LIE" thing back on gun rights supporters, but the fact is it is YOUR SIDE trying to restrict peoples rights, because you are cowardly assholes scared of things that go "BANG." It is also your side that has to lie, and distort, such as linking autos and semi autos, using SCARY terms like assault rifle and assault weapon, and going for the back door chickenshit approach to restricting gun rights.

If you want the government to tell you how to live your life down to the second, go ahead. leave the rest of us out of it. You can die safe in your bed a coward if you want to, I dont.

My side was to not ban any gun, but gun nuts have behaved so much like assholes that it's understandable that no one would give them any consideration. Those are the consequences of being an asshole. Since you people want to be unreasonable, then a reasonable person isn't going to give you any consideration. Your rhetoric just makes people like me, who want law abiding citizens to have access to these weapons, to just say fuck you. Maybe you idiots haven't figured out yet how that dumbshit NRA propaganda has consequences and you are turning away a lot more people than you are attracting. Take a look at these gun nuts on this site! How many times have I been accused of wanting something I didn't want. Maybe you people are just too stupid to own a gun.

NOW you say you "dont want to ban any gun." But the next time someone uses one illegally in some massacre, I am sure you will call for bans, and the convinent registry will allow for the government to easily find them.

And us not believing a word you are saying is the consequence of you and your ilk being fucking liars.

And i find it comical being called an idiot by someone who thinks making law abdiding gun owners go through burecratic hoops will somehow make them safer from CRIMINALS who use guns ILLEGALLY. Thats true stupdity at its best. Its has been and always will be about control.



Y

Who gives a flying fuck what you believe? It's a brilliant strategy to have an opinion you care about so much that you are so willing to make enemies by the way you behave. Spread your craziness around and don't keep it all bottled up on one issue. That way society can see you for the nut you are and disarm you.

Like most rational people, I don't want the populace of America disarmed, but it wouldn't bother me if the gun nuts of this site were disarmed. They act like they are too crazy to own a gun. When people act the way you act, they aren't getting sympathy from me.
 
Poll: 2/3 of Americans Would Defy Federal Gun Ban​

by Tony Lee
25 Jan 2013

In a Fox News survey, two-thirds of Americans said they would "defy" a federal gun ban and keep their guns if the government ever passed a law to "take your guns."

The survey asked respondents, "If the government passed a law to take your guns, would you give up your guns or defy the law and keep your guns?"

Sixty-five percent of those surveyed said they would "defy the law." Specifically, 70% of Republicans, 68% of conservatives, 52% of Democrats, and 59% of liberals said they would "defy" a federal gun ban to keep their guns.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
Poll: 2/3 of Americans Would Defy Federal Gun Ban
2/3 of Americans own guns?



:laugh2:

No it means that 2/3 understand what is right and what is not on this subject.
 

Once again, the questions that deal with the guns themselves are the most convoluted.

Change "high capacity magazines" to what NY has "over 7 rounds" and that number would drop. The other two use the implied connection between full auto and semi auto to pump up the number. and using assault weapons makes them sound scary, easily adding 10-20% in a survey.

The others are same tired incovincences gun control nuts try to implement in the hopes they can incrementally discourage law abiding citizens from owning guns.

Finally, Argumentum ad populum? Did the fact Jim Crow laws existed because they were popular automatically make them right? Despite they fact they violated the Recontruction admendments. Or to an issue more dear to your heart, Does the fact that you could poll southern states like Mississipi and Alabama and find a majority support repealing Roe V. Wade make thier views suddenly worthy of laws that support thier view?
 
My side was to not ban any gun, but gun nuts have behaved so much like assholes that it's understandable that no one would give them any consideration. Those are the consequences of being an asshole. Since you people want to be unreasonable, then a reasonable person isn't going to give you any consideration. Your rhetoric just makes people like me, who want law abiding citizens to have access to these weapons, to just say fuck you. Maybe you idiots haven't figured out yet how that dumbshit NRA propaganda has consequences and you are turning away a lot more people than you are attracting. Take a look at these gun nuts on this site! How many times have I been accused of wanting something I didn't want. Maybe you people are just too stupid to own a gun.

NOW you say you "dont want to ban any gun." But the next time someone uses one illegally in some massacre, I am sure you will call for bans, and the convinent registry will allow for the government to easily find them.

And us not believing a word you are saying is the consequence of you and your ilk being fucking liars.

And i find it comical being called an idiot by someone who thinks making law abdiding gun owners go through burecratic hoops will somehow make them safer from CRIMINALS who use guns ILLEGALLY. Thats true stupdity at its best. Its has been and always will be about control.



Y

Who gives a flying fuck what you believe? It's a brilliant strategy to have an opinion you care about so much that you are so willing to make enemies by the way you behave. Spread your craziness around and don't keep it all bottled up on one issue. That way society can see you for the nut you are and disarm you.

Like most rational people, I don't want the populace of America disarmed, but it wouldn't bother me if the gun nuts of this site were disarmed. They act like they are too crazy to own a gun. When people act the way you act, they aren't getting sympathy from me.

By posting our views on a fucking internet message board, we are somehow disqualified from exercising our rights? YOU are the one trying to let the government infringe on MY rights. That makes you the asshole, not me.

So I guess you support ThoughtCrime now? eh? How Orwellian.

We don't want your sympathy, we want you to leave us the fuck alone But progressives can't do that. And statists defintely can't do that.

This all stems from your inability to see a person being normal and having a different view than you. thus you have to make up crap about crazy, or evil or stupid. It is the sign of a limited intellect.
 
NOW you say you "dont want to ban any gun." But the next time someone uses one illegally in some massacre, I am sure you will call for bans, and the convinent registry will allow for the government to easily find them.

And us not believing a word you are saying is the consequence of you and your ilk being fucking liars.

And i find it comical being called an idiot by someone who thinks making law abdiding gun owners go through burecratic hoops will somehow make them safer from CRIMINALS who use guns ILLEGALLY. Thats true stupdity at its best. Its has been and always will be about control.



Y

Who gives a flying fuck what you believe? It's a brilliant strategy to have an opinion you care about so much that you are so willing to make enemies by the way you behave. Spread your craziness around and don't keep it all bottled up on one issue. That way society can see you for the nut you are and disarm you.

Like most rational people, I don't want the populace of America disarmed, but it wouldn't bother me if the gun nuts of this site were disarmed. They act like they are too crazy to own a gun. When people act the way you act, they aren't getting sympathy from me.

By posting our views on a fucking internet message board, we are somehow disqualified from exercising our rights? YOU are the one trying to let the government infringe on MY rights. That makes you the asshole, not me.

So I guess you support ThoughtCrime now? eh? How Orwellian.

We don't want your sympathy, we want you to leave us the fuck alone But progressives can't do that. And statists defintely can't do that.

This all stems from your inability to see a person being normal and having a different view than you. thus you have to make up crap about crazy, or evil or stupid. It is the sign of a limited intellect.

I thought I made it clear. By going on the internet and behaving like nuts, you have convinced people you are crazy and crazy people shouldn't have guns.

You live in a society that has laws. If you don't want this society to make laws that you have to obey, leave this society! We aren't going to leave you alone to do whatever you want to do.

I know people who have plenty of weapons and many more than you have. Your type is fucking things up for them and yourself. You aren't going to get your way by acting like a bunch of crazy people. You may impress each other with your childish behavior, but you aren't impressing the country.

Tell us about your cold dead hands, like we haven't heard that a thousand times!
 
Is this proposed gun ban banning all gun ownership rights of an individual? No. What, do you want fucking surface to air missiles now too? I don't see you bitching about them being banned.

I mean, what kind of fucking modern day well regulated militia doesn't have fucking surface to air missiles?

Shit, bitch... even in Somalia they have surface to air missiles.

YOUR RIGHTS ARE BEING INFRINGED UPON BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

Surface to air missles are explosives.

No right to bear explosives.

It's a right to bear arms, not a right to bear guns. Surface to air missiles is an implement of war, making it classified as arms. So many things involving explosives are also classified as arms.

See, people like you gave up those rights long ago! There is a precedent. And you seem to be fine with it. And people down the line will be fine with a couple more restrictions.
 
Last edited:
Is this proposed gun ban banning all gun ownership rights of an individual? No. What, do you want fucking surface to air missiles now too? I don't see you bitching about them being banned.

I mean, what kind of fucking modern day well regulated militia doesn't have fucking surface to air missiles?

Shit, bitch... even in Somalia they have surface to air missiles.

YOUR RIGHTS ARE BEING INFRINGED UPON BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

Surface to air missles are explosives.

No right to bear explosives.

It's a right to bear arms, not a right to bear guns. Surface to air missiles is an implement of war, making it classified as arms. So many things involving explosives are also classified as arms.

See, people like you gave up those rights long ago! There is a precedent. And you seem to be fine with it.

You can't bear explosives.
 

Forum List

Back
Top