President Walker 2016

[Synthaholic]

I've already told you that Jeb will get the nomination. I am never wrong about who republicans will pick and this one is easy

Anybody but Romney!

And then they pick Romney.

 

[Synthaholic]

I have no desperation

I am just able to pick out credible candidates from those in the the GOP clown car

It is not difficult predicting who the Republican candidate will be

You're in a blind panic.

Hillary cannot win. The ONLY hope you have is Bush, so that you can campaign against Dubya.

Jeb will not be the GOP nominee, so you may as well get used to saying "President Walker."

Walker is too boring

No personality and nobody knows who Gov Wanker is

Plus, he has a lot of skeletons. Hell, two of his aides are now in prison.

 

[Synthaholic]

Walker is better than most in the Republican clown car

But he doesn't have a chance to beat Jeb Bush unless Bush does something to implode

And neither can attract the democrats needed win a General Election.

I think Bush could take Florida from Hillary but Hillary would still take most of the other swing states

The only one who worries me in the least is Kasich. Fortunately, he has an ugly personality that shows itself at the worst times.

 

[Synthaholic]

Well, Walker is the Koch's boy.

 

[Synthaholic]

Problem for Walker is nobody knows who he is, he lacks charisma to stand out in a crowd of 15 candidates and risks getting lost in the shuffle

I don't see any issue that makes him stand out

Plus he looks like he has Alcohol Fetal Syndrome.

It's Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.

Yeah, I think I was drunk when I typed that.

and if that's the worst you can say about Walker I'd suggest you shut your fucking piehole because you look as stupid as your avatar suggests you are.

Not even close.

 

[Synthaholic]

I'm beginning to lean a bit towards Walker.

 

[rightwinger]

I've already told you that Jeb will get the nomination. I am never wrong about who republicans will pick and this one is easy

Anybody but Romney!

And then they pick Romney.

Same with McCain

Conservatives strut and claim there is no way a moderate will get the nomination......they always do

Jeb Bush will be their man in 2016

 

[Synthaholic]

99% of the voters know who Hillary is
Maybe 25% recognize Walker

Name recognition is all she's got. The more the voters see of her, the less they like her. That's why she's always hiding from the press.

Polls show her kicking the ass of every Republican

As they did in 2007.
Oops.

What 'oops'? An even stronger candidate ended up kicking their asses.

By a LANDSLIDE!

Id suggest you odnt know the word "landslide" but that would imply you know something else.

Obama/Biden 365
McCain/Palin 173

That's a LANDSLIDE.

Hillary lost in 2007. She'll lose in 2016. For the same reasons.

Obama is running again?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm beginning to lean a bit towards Walker.

No doubt....Walker is a badass

 

[Synthaholic]

Name recognition is all she's got. The more the voters see of her, the less they like her. That's why she's always hiding from the press.

Polls show her kicking the ass of every Republican

That's pure name recognition. She's the only Democrat candidate, and there are 15 Republicans competing with each other for attention. When there is only one Republican running against her, then the polls might mean something.

She's also been on the national stage for over 20 years. Of course people know her. and they dont like her. Creating a real problem for her candidacy.

On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton is dominant. She gets 64% to 14% for Bernie Sanders, 8% for Jim Webb, 5% for Lincoln Chafee, and 2% for Martin O'Malley. Clinton has 79% support from African Americans, is over 60% with liberals, moderates, men, women, younger voters, and seniors, and is over 50% with whites, Hispanics, and middle aged voters.​

How dumb are you? Don't answer - it was a rhetorical question.

You realize wht you write was not responsive to what I wrote, right?

You said people don't like her. 64%, 79%, 60%, and over 50% say you're stupid.

How stupid are you? Dumb enough to use the same stupid avatar for almost 4 years.

So, intelligence is measured by how long you keep an avatar?

No wonder you wingnuts lose in landslides.

 

[Political Junky]

I'm beginning to lean a bit towards Walker.

No doubt....Walker is a badass

OMG

 

[bripat9643]

Walker is better than most in the Republican clown car

But he doesn't have a chance to beat Jeb Bush unless Bush does something to implode

And neither can attract the democrats needed win a General Election.

I think Bush could take Florida from Hillary but Hillary would still take most of the other swing states

The only one who worries me in the least is Kasich. Fortunately, he has an ugly personality that shows itself at the worst times.

 

[S.J.]

Problem for Walker is nobody knows who he is, he lacks charisma to stand out in a crowd of 15 candidates and risks getting lost in the shuffle

I don't see any issue that makes him stand out

Plus he looks like he has Alcohol Fetal Syndrome.

It's Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.

Yeah, I think I was drunk when I typed that.

and if that's the worst you can say about Walker I'd suggest you shut your fucking piehole because you look as stupid as your avatar suggests you are.

Not even close.

I think you've been drunk every time you've typed anything here.

 

[S.J.]

I base it on a several things. His policies, his experience, his track record, as well as his personality. He seems like someone you can relate to. He's disarming and makes persuasive arguments. He can win people over, doesn't seem like an extremist, even tempered and doesn't have a lot of baggage. I think he will pull in a lot of independents as well as the Republican base, not to mention libertarians. He's definitely presidential material.

Ok. Do you want to bet $20 on this? Say you get $20 if he turns out to be the nominee and you pay me $20 if he isn't?

How about if you start your own thread if you want to change the subject?

I don't see how this is a subject change, and it is a very serious question: essentially it is a test of how seriously you actually take your claim that Walker is going to be the nominee.

If you disagree with the premise, don't participate in the poll or respond to the question.

You don't make the rules around here, bub.

No I don't, and you don't abide by the ones that exist.

 

[jon_berzerk]

he would pick someone not listed

 

[S.J.]

How about if you start your own thread if you want to change the subject?

I don't see how this is a subject change, and it is a very serious question: essentially it is a test of how seriously you actually take your claim that Walker is going to be the nominee.

If you disagree with the premise, don't participate in the poll or respond to the question.

Hrrm? You didn't say that to other people on the thread telling you you were wrong on the premise, so why respond differently now on this particular point about it? Is it because your realize your premise isn't likely to be actually true?

Do you feel slighted or something?

No, just intrigued by your inconsistency.

I'm sorry I hurt your fragile little ego, fuckface, but I know you'll get over it.

 

[Statistikhengst]

And did the GOP learn from the mistake, that you can't tell half of the country to go fuck themselves? No, no they did not.

Pointing out that people with no skin in the game will vote themselves bigger entitlements is not telling anyone to gofuck themselves.

That's not how the American public took his remarks. I believe that video cost him the election. It's possible that he may have lost anyway, but my feeling is that he lost due to the damaging video.

Bullshit.
He lost because Obama moved quickly to define him as a rich white guy. He lost because the press played that up. He lost because of enormous turnout in inner city black areas in key states. He lost because his advisors kept him on a tight leash and never allowed him to shine through (he is actually a warm, funny, and compassionate guy) And he lost because he wasnt a conservative so a lot of conservatives stayed home.
But libs cant thnk beyond one factor and always look for the easy explanations.

Conservatives came out in DROVES in 2004 for Bush, Jr.

Romney only got 1.1 million less votes in 2012 than Bush, Jr. in 2004, and even had he gotten as many votes as 43, he would have still lost to Obama, who beat him by 5 million votes.

So, this old red herring that "Conservatives stayed home" is just bunk.

More moderates and Liberals exist in the USA than you think. Well, assuming that you can even think.

Obama won because he waged the better campaign and because Romney was forced to say all sorts of crazy shit to give the "base" enough red meat to win the primaries - red meat that then became his poison pill in the GE. And exactly that will happen in 2016.

The problem is not with Romney, it is with your party, which lives 50 years in the past and hates minorities.

Your second problem is that it is not the "Obama coalition", not just a two-time occurrence only because of Obama's personality. It is the new Democratic coalition and it is going to be here a long, long time.

You are shitting your pants because never before in our history since polling of this intensity have we seen a Democratic candidate this far ahead in so many independent-from-each-other-polls. Republicans have been used to seeing the Elephant slightly ahead, not the Donkey way, way, way ahead. 350 polls already, 1,400 matchups, Hillary way, way ahead, without ever losing her lead.

Clinton is ahead of Paul, Cruz, Walker, Carson, Christie and Trump by double-digits nationally and in the key battlegrounds where it counts. She is consistently ahead of them, over and over and over again.

Clinton is ahead of Bush and Rubio by single digits, mostly +4 and above, in national polling and in the battlegrounds where it counts.

Hillary is making Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas (yes, Kansas), Arizona, Georgia and probably South Dakota quite competitive. Should those states become battlegrounds, and some of them will become battlegrounds, then the GOP will be forced to release funds to try to retain those core GOP states. I can't wait to see the first polling from Indiana; I bet that is going to be very, very enlightening.

And there is not even one single blue-wall state, for instance, New Jersey, where the GOP is even making the slightest dent in the Democratic column.

In the meantime, Clinton is demonstrably ahead in Virginia, which is slowly but surely being cemented into the Democratic column, and North Carolina is a tossup. North Carolina, a state that the GOP should already be putting away.

And these numbers have been like this for more than two years now. Now that the GOP candidates have declared, these numbers have also barely budged.

Same pattern as for Obama in 2011, only much, much more to the advantage of the Democratic Party.

Soon, these Blue Wall will permanently be above 270 and practically unbreakable. And it will be the GOP's own fault for this, for being so short-sighted.

Don't say no one told you the warning signs.

blahblahblah.
Democrats have lost every national election except the presidency since 2010. They'll lose all of them in 2016.

Good luck with that one. Your lack of understanding about the difference between Presidential cycles and mid-term cycles is fun to watch.

Not only that, you just lied like a rug: Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, won the Governor's mansion in Virginia in November, 2013. That was a gubernatorial with national implications, because it broke the so-called Virginia curse.

You have been told the warning signs. If you are too stupid to recognize them, then you can only be the one and only fake Rabbi.

 

[The Rabbi]

Pointing out that people with no skin in the game will vote themselves bigger entitlements is not telling anyone to gofuck themselves.

That's not how the American public took his remarks. I believe that video cost him the election. It's possible that he may have lost anyway, but my feeling is that he lost due to the damaging video.

Bullshit.
He lost because Obama moved quickly to define him as a rich white guy. He lost because the press played that up. He lost because of enormous turnout in inner city black areas in key states. He lost because his advisors kept him on a tight leash and never allowed him to shine through (he is actually a warm, funny, and compassionate guy) And he lost because he wasnt a conservative so a lot of conservatives stayed home.
But libs cant thnk beyond one factor and always look for the easy explanations.

Conservatives came out in DROVES in 2004 for Bush, Jr.

Romney only got 1.1 million less votes in 2012 than Bush, Jr. in 2004, and even had he gotten as many votes as 43, he would have still lost to Obama, who beat him by 5 million votes.

So, this old red herring that "Conservatives stayed home" is just bunk.

More moderates and Liberals exist in the USA than you think. Well, assuming that you can even think.

Obama won because he waged the better campaign and because Romney was forced to say all sorts of crazy shit to give the "base" enough red meat to win the primaries - red meat that then became his poison pill in the GE. And exactly that will happen in 2016.

The problem is not with Romney, it is with your party, which lives 50 years in the past and hates minorities.

Your second problem is that it is not the "Obama coalition", not just a two-time occurrence only because of Obama's personality. It is the new Democratic coalition and it is going to be here a long, long time.

You are shitting your pants because never before in our history since polling of this intensity have we seen a Democratic candidate this far ahead in so many independent-from-each-other-polls. Republicans have been used to seeing the Elephant slightly ahead, not the Donkey way, way, way ahead. 350 polls already, 1,400 matchups, Hillary way, way ahead, without ever losing her lead.

Clinton is ahead of Paul, Cruz, Walker, Carson, Christie and Trump by double-digits nationally and in the key battlegrounds where it counts. She is consistently ahead of them, over and over and over again.

Clinton is ahead of Bush and Rubio by single digits, mostly +4 and above, in national polling and in the battlegrounds where it counts.

Hillary is making Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas (yes, Kansas), Arizona, Georgia and probably South Dakota quite competitive. Should those states become battlegrounds, and some of them will become battlegrounds, then the GOP will be forced to release funds to try to retain those core GOP states. I can't wait to see the first polling from Indiana; I bet that is going to be very, very enlightening.

And there is not even one single blue-wall state, for instance, New Jersey, where the GOP is even making the slightest dent in the Democratic column.

In the meantime, Clinton is demonstrably ahead in Virginia, which is slowly but surely being cemented into the Democratic column, and North Carolina is a tossup. North Carolina, a state that the GOP should already be putting away.

And these numbers have been like this for more than two years now. Now that the GOP candidates have declared, these numbers have also barely budged.

Same pattern as for Obama in 2011, only much, much more to the advantage of the Democratic Party.

Soon, these Blue Wall will permanently be above 270 and practically unbreakable. And it will be the GOP's own fault for this, for being so short-sighted.

Don't say no one told you the warning signs.

blahblahblah.
Democrats have lost every national election except the presidency since 2010. They'll lose all of them in 2016.

Good luck with that one. Your lack of understanding about the difference between Presidential cycles and mid-term cycles is fun to watch.

Not only that, you just lied like a rug: Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, won the Governor's mansion in Virginia in November, 2013. That was a gubernatorial with national implications, because it broke the so-called Virginia curse.

You have been told the warning signs. If you are too stupid to recognize them, then you can only be the one and only fake Rabbi.

And the present governor of blue states like Illinois and Maryland is.....?
Yes, you are stupid and ill informed and will backtrack when events prove it.

 

[Statistikhengst]

That's not how the American public took his remarks. I believe that video cost him the election. It's possible that he may have lost anyway, but my feeling is that he lost due to the damaging video.

Bullshit.
He lost because Obama moved quickly to define him as a rich white guy. He lost because the press played that up. He lost because of enormous turnout in inner city black areas in key states. He lost because his advisors kept him on a tight leash and never allowed him to shine through (he is actually a warm, funny, and compassionate guy) And he lost because he wasnt a conservative so a lot of conservatives stayed home.
But libs cant thnk beyond one factor and always look for the easy explanations.

Conservatives came out in DROVES in 2004 for Bush, Jr.

Romney only got 1.1 million less votes in 2012 than Bush, Jr. in 2004, and even had he gotten as many votes as 43, he would have still lost to Obama, who beat him by 5 million votes.

So, this old red herring that "Conservatives stayed home" is just bunk.

More moderates and Liberals exist in the USA than you think. Well, assuming that you can even think.

Obama won because he waged the better campaign and because Romney was forced to say all sorts of crazy shit to give the "base" enough red meat to win the primaries - red meat that then became his poison pill in the GE. And exactly that will happen in 2016.

The problem is not with Romney, it is with your party, which lives 50 years in the past and hates minorities.

Your second problem is that it is not the "Obama coalition", not just a two-time occurrence only because of Obama's personality. It is the new Democratic coalition and it is going to be here a long, long time.

You are shitting your pants because never before in our history since polling of this intensity have we seen a Democratic candidate this far ahead in so many independent-from-each-other-polls. Republicans have been used to seeing the Elephant slightly ahead, not the Donkey way, way, way ahead. 350 polls already, 1,400 matchups, Hillary way, way ahead, without ever losing her lead.

Clinton is ahead of Paul, Cruz, Walker, Carson, Christie and Trump by double-digits nationally and in the key battlegrounds where it counts. She is consistently ahead of them, over and over and over again.

Clinton is ahead of Bush and Rubio by single digits, mostly +4 and above, in national polling and in the battlegrounds where it counts.

Hillary is making Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas (yes, Kansas), Arizona, Georgia and probably South Dakota quite competitive. Should those states become battlegrounds, and some of them will become battlegrounds, then the GOP will be forced to release funds to try to retain those core GOP states. I can't wait to see the first polling from Indiana; I bet that is going to be very, very enlightening.

And there is not even one single blue-wall state, for instance, New Jersey, where the GOP is even making the slightest dent in the Democratic column.

In the meantime, Clinton is demonstrably ahead in Virginia, which is slowly but surely being cemented into the Democratic column, and North Carolina is a tossup. North Carolina, a state that the GOP should already be putting away.

And these numbers have been like this for more than two years now. Now that the GOP candidates have declared, these numbers have also barely budged.

Same pattern as for Obama in 2011, only much, much more to the advantage of the Democratic Party.

Soon, these Blue Wall will permanently be above 270 and practically unbreakable. And it will be the GOP's own fault for this, for being so short-sighted.

Don't say no one told you the warning signs.

blahblahblah.
Democrats have lost every national election except the presidency since 2010. They'll lose all of them in 2016.

Good luck with that one. Your lack of understanding about the difference between Presidential cycles and mid-term cycles is fun to watch.

Not only that, you just lied like a rug: Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, won the Governor's mansion in Virginia in November, 2013. That was a gubernatorial with national implications, because it broke the so-called Virginia curse.

You have been told the warning signs. If you are too stupid to recognize them, then you can only be the one and only fake Rabbi.

And the present governor of blue states like Illinois and Maryland is.....?
Yes, you are stupid and ill informed and will backtrack when events prove it.

I am gonna enjoy handing your ass to you in 2016.

Oh, BTW, you have exactly nine days left for your prediction that Greece would exit the Eurozone within 6 months of your posting from January 26, 2015 to come to fruition. Then I will call you on the carpet for a false prediction.

Looking forward to serving you that portion of humble pie.

The fun thing about you being such an ass is that you, for someone who is so nasty, I mean, really nasty, you are actually very, very stupid. There is no way you can be a Jew. Jews are just simply never that stupid.

 

[rightwinger]

Bullshit.
He lost because Obama moved quickly to define him as a rich white guy. He lost because the press played that up. He lost because of enormous turnout in inner city black areas in key states. He lost because his advisors kept him on a tight leash and never allowed him to shine through (he is actually a warm, funny, and compassionate guy) And he lost because he wasnt a conservative so a lot of conservatives stayed home.
But libs cant thnk beyond one factor and always look for the easy explanations.

Conservatives came out in DROVES in 2004 for Bush, Jr.

Romney only got 1.1 million less votes in 2012 than Bush, Jr. in 2004, and even had he gotten as many votes as 43, he would have still lost to Obama, who beat him by 5 million votes.

So, this old red herring that "Conservatives stayed home" is just bunk.

More moderates and Liberals exist in the USA than you think. Well, assuming that you can even think.

Obama won because he waged the better campaign and because Romney was forced to say all sorts of crazy shit to give the "base" enough red meat to win the primaries - red meat that then became his poison pill in the GE. And exactly that will happen in 2016.

The problem is not with Romney, it is with your party, which lives 50 years in the past and hates minorities.

Your second problem is that it is not the "Obama coalition", not just a two-time occurrence only because of Obama's personality. It is the new Democratic coalition and it is going to be here a long, long time.

You are shitting your pants because never before in our history since polling of this intensity have we seen a Democratic candidate this far ahead in so many independent-from-each-other-polls. Republicans have been used to seeing the Elephant slightly ahead, not the Donkey way, way, way ahead. 350 polls already, 1,400 matchups, Hillary way, way ahead, without ever losing her lead.

Clinton is ahead of Paul, Cruz, Walker, Carson, Christie and Trump by double-digits nationally and in the key battlegrounds where it counts. She is consistently ahead of them, over and over and over again.

Clinton is ahead of Bush and Rubio by single digits, mostly +4 and above, in national polling and in the battlegrounds where it counts.

Hillary is making Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas (yes, Kansas), Arizona, Georgia and probably South Dakota quite competitive. Should those states become battlegrounds, and some of them will become battlegrounds, then the GOP will be forced to release funds to try to retain those core GOP states. I can't wait to see the first polling from Indiana; I bet that is going to be very, very enlightening.

And there is not even one single blue-wall state, for instance, New Jersey, where the GOP is even making the slightest dent in the Democratic column.

In the meantime, Clinton is demonstrably ahead in Virginia, which is slowly but surely being cemented into the Democratic column, and North Carolina is a tossup. North Carolina, a state that the GOP should already be putting away.

And these numbers have been like this for more than two years now. Now that the GOP candidates have declared, these numbers have also barely budged.

Same pattern as for Obama in 2011, only much, much more to the advantage of the Democratic Party.

Soon, these Blue Wall will permanently be above 270 and practically unbreakable. And it will be the GOP's own fault for this, for being so short-sighted.

Don't say no one told you the warning signs.

blahblahblah.
Democrats have lost every national election except the presidency since 2010. They'll lose all of them in 2016.

Good luck with that one. Your lack of understanding about the difference between Presidential cycles and mid-term cycles is fun to watch.

Not only that, you just lied like a rug: Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, won the Governor's mansion in Virginia in November, 2013. That was a gubernatorial with national implications, because it broke the so-called Virginia curse.

You have been told the warning signs. If you are too stupid to recognize them, then you can only be the one and only fake Rabbi.

And the present governor of blue states like Illinois and Maryland is.....?
Yes, you are stupid and ill informed and will backtrack when events prove it.

I am gonna enjoy handing your ass to you in 2016.

Oh, BTW, you have exactly nine days left for your prediction that Greece would exit the Eurozone within 6 months of your posting from January 26, 2015 to come to fruition. Then I will call you on the carpet for a false prediction.

Looking forward to serving you that portion of humble pie.

The fun thing about you being such an ass is that you, for someone who is so nasty, I mean, really nasty, are actually very, very stupid. There is no way you can be Jew. Jews are just simply never that stupid.

Good Luck....after all You are dealing with the Rabbi

Rabbi will:

Deny he said that
Move the goalpost
Run away
Claim that he was really right

Take your pick