Proof Liberals Believe Blacks Are Inferior

[NYcarbineer]

So this is what YOU believe then? You believe that white people are superior to black people? Why not just come out and say it instead of being a coward? Expose yourself as the rotten racist that you really are.

"So this is what YOU believe then? You believe that white people are superior to black people?"

See what I mean about idiots?

Read the title, dope.

Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?

Do you agree with LBJ, that it is consistent with America's principles to create a separate class of people based on the color of their skin?

So you don't dare answer the question about Charles Murray. Do you at least dispute that he is proof that conservatives believe blacks are inferior?

That's because, as is your method, you posted a lie as though it were the truth.

"Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?"

He didn't say that, liar.

"It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."

 

[NYcarbineer]

Another copy and paste response - not a rebuttal or a retort - simply an echo of someone whose career and income is dependent on controversy created by simple explanations of complex people responding to complex problems and issues in decades past.

Copy and paste refers to the way information is presented....not to content, you moron.

If you had the depth and breadth of information that I have, you might use that method as well.....but you don't, so you can't.

Time to come clean...admit I taught you the history you didn't know.


Or....were you simply lying?

You posted history when the topic is today.

Barry Goldwater voted against the civil rights act. He's touted as the father of modern day conservatism.

The Democrats who voted against it are not touted as the fathers of modern day liberalism.

On the contrary.

To date....see post #680, liar.

What is it with RWnuts on this forum and their tedious habit of referring people back to irrelevant posts?

And, still another lie.

There's nothing in your referred post about Barry Goldwater.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Again, a lie by omission and of ignorance. Al Gore Sr. was a Democratic Senator from Tenn and Tenn. was a member of the Confederacy and Al Gore Sr. Vote Against the Civil Rights Act.

Byrd was a Democrat, and if you had the ability to read, you would understand that 80% of the Northern Vote supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact Byrd participated in the filibuster:

"When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. Said Russell: We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."

I never lie.
Clearly, my education and research is far better and more extensive than that of a moron like you, who's every attempt is to hide the racism of the Democrat/Liberals.

More:

1. First of all, the Democrats didn’t pass the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. That bill, along with every civil rights bill for the preceding century, was supported by substantially more Republicans than Democrats.

2. Second, the South kept voting for Democrats for decades after that 1964 act. And, btw, Democrats continued to win a plurality of votes in southern congressional elections for the next 30 years…right up to 1994. GOP Poised to Reap Redistricting Rewards by Michael Barone on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent

First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative, i.e. Blue Dog Democrats and from the former Confederate States (set aside Byrd).

The vast majority of liberals are not racists, some can be bigots. For example, I cannot tolerate arrogant, self righteous jerks, like PoliticalChic - and that makes me both a bigot and someone with good judgment.

"First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative,..."

Another lie from the liar.


Let's see how conservative the racist Democrat Liberals were:

"The most important points: all the segregationists in the Senate were Democrats, and remained same for the rest of their lives…except for one. And they were not conservative.

1. 1. Strom Thurmond became a Republican, albeit 16 years later. Lets see how many of the 12 in the Senate were conservative.
   2. Senator Harry Byrd, staunch opponent of anti-communist McCarthy
   3. Senator Robert Byrd, proabortion, opposed Gulf Wars, supported ERA, high grades from NARAL and ACLU
   4. Senator Allen Ellender, McCarthy opponent, pacifist
   5. Senator Sam Ervin, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, Nixon antagonist
   6. Senator Albert Gore, Sr., McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War
   7. Senator James Eastland, strong anti-communist
   8. Senator Wm. Fulbright, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, big UN supporter
   9. Senator Walter F. George, supported TVA, and Great Society programs
   10. Senator Ernest Hollings, initiated federal food stamp program, …but supported Clarence Thomas’ nomination
   11. Senator Russell Long, led the campaign for Great Society programs
   12. Senator Richard Russell, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, supported FDR’s New Deal
   13. Senator John Stennis, McCarthy opponent, opposed Robert Bork’s nomination

Notice how segregationist positions went hand-in-hand with opposition to McCarthy? Not all Democrats….Robert Kennedy worked for McCarthy, and Senator John F. Kennedy refused to censure him."
Coulter, "Mugged," chapter 12

Another copy and paste response - not a rebuttal or a retort - simply an echo of someone whose career and income is dependent on controversy created by simple explanations of complex people responding to complex problems and issues in decades past.

Copy and paste refers to the way information is presented....not to content, you moron.

If you had the depth and breadth of information that I have, you might use that method as well.....but you don't, so you can't.

Time to come clean...admit I taught you the history you didn't know.


Or....were you simply lying?

History I didn't know? Well, there's plenty, but I do know how to use a library, the Internet and my well developed sense of recall and recognition. I usually can recall events I lived through and recognize when someone like you manufactures history.

Having read extensively, I do recall something called the Ministry of Truth and that rings a bell (that is, I recognize) that much of what you present as fact, is something else. It is manufactured by you and the authors you use as authorities to obfuscate history as it has been written by many others over time, in an effort by you to prove your point of view is correct, and everything believed before your ejaculations is incorrect and believed only by morons.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"So this is what YOU believe then? You believe that white people are superior to black people?"

See what I mean about idiots?

Read the title, dope.

Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?

Do you agree with LBJ, that it is consistent with America's principles to create a separate class of people based on the color of their skin?

So you don't dare answer the question about Charles Murray. Do you at least dispute that he is proof that conservatives believe blacks are inferior?

That's because, as is your method, you posted a lie as though it were the truth.

"Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?"

He didn't say that, liar.

"It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."

You lied when you said "Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?"

Do you know what 'assert' means?
It means to state a fact or belief confidently and forcefully.
He didn't do that, did he?
You're just a low-life gutter snipe, a liar.


That quote doesn't say what you said he said, does it.

This is what he said, in chapter 13: "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."

You lied when you didn't include the part about environment, didn't you.

Is that because you are a congenital liar?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I never lie.
Clearly, my education and research is far better and more extensive than that of a moron like you, who's every attempt is to hide the racism of the Democrat/Liberals.

More:

1. First of all, the Democrats didn’t pass the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. That bill, along with every civil rights bill for the preceding century, was supported by substantially more Republicans than Democrats.

2. Second, the South kept voting for Democrats for decades after that 1964 act. And, btw, Democrats continued to win a plurality of votes in southern congressional elections for the next 30 years…right up to 1994. GOP Poised to Reap Redistricting Rewards by Michael Barone on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent

First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative, i.e. Blue Dog Democrats and from the former Confederate States (set aside Byrd).

The vast majority of liberals are not racists, some can be bigots. For example, I cannot tolerate arrogant, self righteous jerks, like PoliticalChic - and that makes me both a bigot and someone with good judgment.

"First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative,..."

Another lie from the liar.


Let's see how conservative the racist Democrat Liberals were:

"The most important points: all the segregationists in the Senate were Democrats, and remained same for the rest of their lives…except for one. And they were not conservative.

1. 1. Strom Thurmond became a Republican, albeit 16 years later. Lets see how many of the 12 in the Senate were conservative.
   2. Senator Harry Byrd, staunch opponent of anti-communist McCarthy
   3. Senator Robert Byrd, proabortion, opposed Gulf Wars, supported ERA, high grades from NARAL and ACLU
   4. Senator Allen Ellender, McCarthy opponent, pacifist
   5. Senator Sam Ervin, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, Nixon antagonist
   6. Senator Albert Gore, Sr., McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War
   7. Senator James Eastland, strong anti-communist
   8. Senator Wm. Fulbright, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, big UN supporter
   9. Senator Walter F. George, supported TVA, and Great Society programs
   10. Senator Ernest Hollings, initiated federal food stamp program, …but supported Clarence Thomas’ nomination
   11. Senator Russell Long, led the campaign for Great Society programs
   12. Senator Richard Russell, McCarthy opponent, anti-Vietnam War, supported FDR’s New Deal
   13. Senator John Stennis, McCarthy opponent, opposed Robert Bork’s nomination

Notice how segregationist positions went hand-in-hand with opposition to McCarthy? Not all Democrats….Robert Kennedy worked for McCarthy, and Senator John F. Kennedy refused to censure him."
Coulter, "Mugged," chapter 12

Another copy and paste response - not a rebuttal or a retort - simply an echo of someone whose career and income is dependent on controversy created by simple explanations of complex people responding to complex problems and issues in decades past.

Copy and paste refers to the way information is presented....not to content, you moron.

If you had the depth and breadth of information that I have, you might use that method as well.....but you don't, so you can't.

Time to come clean...admit I taught you the history you didn't know.


Or....were you simply lying?

History I didn't know? Well, there's plenty, but I do know how to use a library, the Internet and my well developed sense of recall and recognition. I usually can recall events I lived through and recognize when someone like you manufactures history.

Having read extensively, I do recall something called the Ministry of Truth and that rings a bell (that is, I recognize) that much of what you present as fact, is something else. It is manufactured by you and the authors you use as authorities to obfuscate history as it has been written by many others over time, in an effort by you to prove your point of view is correct, and everything believed before your ejaculations is incorrect and believed only by morons.

Let me write what you should have said: "Thank you for post #480....I had no idea that the most popular Democrat today....Bill Clinton...is a dyed in the wool racist!
I will never doubt you again....nor ever vote for a Democrat."

Instead, the cur that you are, you pretend to ignore the post.

 

[GreenBean]

1. Can black folks be as successful as whites?
Conservatives believe so.....Liberals don't.

That's why they make special rules based on skin color, and refuse to hold black folk to the same requirements as anyone else.
In their heart of hearts, Liberals just don't think blacks can make it, that they are not on a par with whites.


2. Here's a conservative who explains the difficulties blacks have in society:

"It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived."
Coulter, "Mugged," chapter seven




3. "Every now and then you come across an article that folks just need to read. This one written by Michael Smith entitled, “Confessions of a Public Defender”....is one of those articles.

It is a profound and deeply disturbing piece, which, as we end 2014, we all need to comprehend as we move towards the 50th anniversary of the Great Society initiatives of President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Smith articulates that which ails the black community–the real discussion we should be having on race, not that of victimhood and the further expansion of the welfare nanny-state..... I’m quite sure the progressive socialist left will criticize me for sharing this article–that’s just who they are–they hate the truth. But if there is a war to be fought, it is for the soul of the inner city and the black community."
Allen West
Quite Possibly the Most Racist Article You Will Ever Read American Renaissance




The following article is tough to read. Buckle your seat belts....and keep you hands inside the ride at all times.

4. " I am a public defender in a large southern metropolitan area. Fewer than ten percent of the people in the area I serve are black but over 90 per cent of my clients are black.... but there are a few whites.
[I'm still] liberal after all these years.



5. ... crime has racial patterns. Hispanics usually commit two kinds of crime: sexual assault on children and driving under the influence. Blacks commit many violent crimes but very few sex crimes. The handful of whites I see commit all kinds of crimes. In my many years as a public defender I have represented only three Asians, and one was half black.

6. As a young lawyer, I believed the official story that blacks are law abiding, intelligent, family-oriented people, but are so poor they must turn to crime to survive. Actual black behavior was a shock to me.

7. The media invariably sugarcoat black behavior. Even the news reports of the very crimes I dealt with in court were slanted. Television news intentionally leaves out unflattering facts about the accused, and sometimes omits names that are obviously black. All this rocked my liberal, tolerant beliefs, but it took me years to set aside my illusions and accept the reality of what I see every day.
[But- I'm still] liberal after all these years."
Confessions of a Public Defender American Renaissance

Liberal social legislation that helps poor/low income Americans helps more whites than blacks,

and always has.

I don't believe you fully grasp the mathematical concepts of percentages and per capita do you ... lol

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

I'm the only Asian there.

My ass is better looking than you.

View attachment 35540

That's not your face????


And you were watching cartoons???

My ass is smarter than you are too. That's not cartoons, it's King of Queens, moron. That is Doug and Deacon. You would probably hate Deacon because he's black.

Stop making up lies about me just because I put you in your place.

Please, you couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper bag. The only thing you are capable of is cutting ad pasting and throwing about insults, and you aren't even very good at THAT. You are a just a nasty miserable person.

You're a big poppy pants.

 

[ChrisL]

My ass is better looking than you.

View attachment 35540

That's not your face????


And you were watching cartoons???

My ass is smarter than you are too. That's not cartoons, it's King of Queens, moron. That is Doug and Deacon. You would probably hate Deacon because he's black.

Stop making up lies about me just because I put you in your place.

Please, you couldn't argue your way out of a wet paper bag. The only thing you are capable of is cutting ad pasting and throwing about insults, and you aren't even very good at THAT. You are a just a nasty miserable person.

You're a big poppy pants.

Those are fighting words.

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Copy and paste refers to the way information is presented....not to content, you moron.

If you had the depth and breadth of information that I have, you might use that method as well.....but you don't, so you can't.

Time to come clean...admit I taught you the history you didn't know.


Or....were you simply lying?

You posted history when the topic is today.

Barry Goldwater voted against the civil rights act. He's touted as the father of modern day conservatism.

The Democrats who voted against it are not touted as the fathers of modern day liberalism.

On the contrary.

To date....see post #680, liar.

What is it with RWnuts on this forum and their tedious habit of referring people back to irrelevant posts?

And, still another lie.

There's nothing in your referred post about Barry Goldwater.

Harry Reid "Obama Electable Because he is Light S…:

 

[ChrisL]

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed with 80% of the Aye vote cast by members of Congress representing States which remained in the Union during the Civil War. Less than 10% of the members of Congress who served the 11 member States of the Confederacy supported the bill.

Thus all of those above who claim Republicans were the good guys and Democrats were the bad guys are liars, liars by omission of the essential facts.

The vote was regional

'
Robert Byrd was a member of which party? Al Gore Sr was a member of which party?

this is about party, not geography.

Again, a lie by omission and of ignorance. Al Gore Sr. was a Democratic Senator from Tenn and Tenn. was a member of the Confederacy and Al Gore Sr. Vote Against the Civil Rights Act.

Byrd was a Democrat, and if you had the ability to read, you would understand that 80% of the Northern Vote supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact Byrd participated in the filibuster:

"When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. Said Russell: We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."

I never lie.
Clearly, my education and research is far better and more extensive than that of a moron like you, who's every attempt is to hide the racism of the Democrat/Liberals.

More:

1. First of all, the Democrats didn’t pass the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. That bill, along with every civil rights bill for the preceding century, was supported by substantially more Republicans than Democrats.

2. Second, the South kept voting for Democrats for decades after that 1964 act. And, btw, Democrats continued to win a plurality of votes in southern congressional elections for the next 30 years…right up to 1994. GOP Poised to Reap Redistricting Rewards by Michael Barone on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent

First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative, i.e. Blue Dog Democrats and from the former Confederate States (set aside Byrd).

The vast majority of liberals are not racists, some can be bigots. For example, I cannot tolerate arrogant, self righteous jerks, like PoliticalChic - and that makes me both a bigot and someone with good judgment.

People like PC are ineducable on this subject. Rightwingers get invested so deeply in myths that you cannot reason with them. They quite resemble, in a political context, those cited in my sig line.

That is because she is incapable of having an adult conversation. If anyone dares to ask her a POLITE question (as I did), she has melt down and resorts to name calling, seems to be a very unstable and immature person.

 

[ChrisL]

I'm sure there are some people from both sides that are racist, and I still don't understand the whole point of this thread. Is OP trying to say that ALL people on the left feel the same way as the person in the article she quoted? That is incredibly ignorant. Original poster is NO different from those on the left who accuse those on the right of being racist. This type of crap solves NO problems and just adds to the division that already exists.

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

How come blacks have a Negro dialect? I see Asian Americans all the time and they don't have an Asian dialect if they were born here. Why is that?

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

So when are you liberals going to put a school in her neighborhood?

Original Obamaphone Lady: Obama Voter Says Vote f…:

 

[PoliticalChic]

'
Robert Byrd was a member of which party? Al Gore Sr was a member of which party?

this is about party, not geography.

Again, a lie by omission and of ignorance. Al Gore Sr. was a Democratic Senator from Tenn and Tenn. was a member of the Confederacy and Al Gore Sr. Vote Against the Civil Rights Act.

Byrd was a Democrat, and if you had the ability to read, you would understand that 80% of the Northern Vote supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In fact Byrd participated in the filibuster:

"When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. Said Russell: We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states."

I never lie.
Clearly, my education and research is far better and more extensive than that of a moron like you, who's every attempt is to hide the racism of the Democrat/Liberals.

More:

1. First of all, the Democrats didn’t pass the Civil Rights Bill of 1964. That bill, along with every civil rights bill for the preceding century, was supported by substantially more Republicans than Democrats.

2. Second, the South kept voting for Democrats for decades after that 1964 act. And, btw, Democrats continued to win a plurality of votes in southern congressional elections for the next 30 years…right up to 1994. GOP Poised to Reap Redistricting Rewards by Michael Barone on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent

First of all, not all Democrats are liberals, and the Democrats who did not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were Conservative, i.e. Blue Dog Democrats and from the former Confederate States (set aside Byrd).

The vast majority of liberals are not racists, some can be bigots. For example, I cannot tolerate arrogant, self righteous jerks, like PoliticalChic - and that makes me both a bigot and someone with good judgment.

People like PC are ineducable on this subject. Rightwingers get invested so deeply in myths that you cannot reason with them. They quite resemble, in a political context, those cited in my sig line.

That is because she is incapable of having an adult conversation. If anyone dares to ask her a POLITE question (as I did), she has melt down and resorts to name calling, seems to be a very unstable and immature person.

So.....you believe....I almost said think.....that you shouldn't be held responsible for understanding the usage of quotation marks?

Verifies what I said about you, doesn't it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm sure there are some people from both sides that are racist, and I still don't understand the whole point of this thread. Is OP trying to say that ALL people on the left feel the same way as the person in the article she quoted? That is incredibly ignorant. Original poster is NO different from those on the left who accuse those on the right of being racist. This type of crap solves NO problems and just adds to the division that already exists.

"... I still don't understand the whole point of this thread."

See what I mean?

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Here is the white version of "Obama Phone Lady".

Obama gave me this Chain saw!:

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Another racist democrat.

Elected Official 8217 s Ominous Tweet 8216 When You Exercise Your WhitePrivilege Don 8217 t Think I 8217 m Not Going to Remember. 8217 TheBlaze.com

 

[NYcarbineer]

How come blacks have a Negro dialect? I see Asian Americans all the time and they don't have an Asian dialect if they were born here. Why is that?

Why do toothless trailer park jesus freakin' stepdaughter diddling dittoheads have Southern accents?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?

Do you agree with LBJ, that it is consistent with America's principles to create a separate class of people based on the color of their skin?

So you don't dare answer the question about Charles Murray. Do you at least dispute that he is proof that conservatives believe blacks are inferior?

That's because, as is your method, you posted a lie as though it were the truth.

"Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?"

He didn't say that, liar.

"It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."

You lied when you said "Do you agree with Charles Murray, renowned conservative, who asserts that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites?"

Do you know what 'assert' means?
It means to state a fact or belief confidently and forcefully.
He didn't do that, did he?
You're just a low-life gutter snipe, a liar.


That quote doesn't say what you said he said, does it.

This is what he said, in chapter 13: "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences."

You lied when you didn't include the part about environment, didn't you.

Is that because you are a congenital liar?

Yes, Murray did that.

The part about the environment is irrelevant if you've claimed that genetics affect the racial difference.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm sure there are some people from both sides that are racist, and I still don't understand the whole point of this thread. Is OP trying to say that ALL people on the left feel the same way as the person in the article she quoted? That is incredibly ignorant. Original poster is NO different from those on the left who accuse those on the right of being racist. This type of crap solves NO problems and just adds to the division that already exists.

"... I still don't understand the whole point of this thread."

See what I mean?

The point of this thread was one more attempt by you to use the opinions of ONE individual to fallaciously assert a conclusion about an entire group of people.