Nate
Gold Member
Good point TK. Also, one would assume that after the scuffle and the police showed up she would have heard the officers talking with Zimmerman and be able to say whether it was the "dominant" voice or the one asking for help.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the record...this was not my thread title.
For the record...this was not my thread title.
Unless the court circumvents the Law, acquittal is the outcome.
Youre assuming that jurors will act rationally to the evidence. Jurors are incredibly fickle.
not to mention you are also assuming both sides will present the evidence accurately.
Uncensored is speshul![]()
courts in recess for lunch
If you're told to walk away by the 911 operator who states "we really don't need you to do that" after being told that you're planning on following someone, I think that goes way beyond being innocent.
Incidentally, the only reason the 911 operator said "we really don't need you to do that" after being told that Zimmerman was going to follow Martin was because 911 operators can't give orders over the phone, nor can they tell civilians what to do.
Except, once again, there's no evidence that Zimmerman did follow him. That's just wishful thinking on the part of the pro-criminal loons.
Zimmerman planned to kill someone that night. That's why he took a loaded gun with him. He stalked a kid whose only crimes were walking while black, wearing a hoodie in the rain and carrying ice tea and Skittles. He told the dispatcher he was stalking the kid. Later, he told the police he had stalked the kid and he told them he had murdered him.
The kid had every right to "stand his ground" and to defend himself but, of course, Skittles is no defense against a gun.
Since it was premeditated and since he confessed to premeditated murder, he should get the death penalty.
As to those who say its a hate crime, that he's a racist or that the kid deserved it because there are photos of him flipping the bird and that he smoked grass - bullshit on all counts.
Zimmmerman should be tried and punished on the facts of the case, not whether he's a racist or the kid was less than perfect.
Here is the relevant sections of the 911 call...
911 dispatcher:
Are you following him? [2:24]
Zimmerman:
Yeah. [2:25]
911 dispatcher:
OK.
We dont need you to do that. [2:26]
Zimmerman:
OK. [2:28]
911 dispatcher:
Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34]
Zimmerman:
George. He ran.
<skip ahead>
Zimmerman:
Its a home. Its 1950 oh, crap, I dont want to give it out I dont know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]
911 dispatcher:
OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]
George Zimmerman's 911 call transcribed - National unsolved cases | Examiner.com
^^(This site has pop-ups and video commercials...I use the Mother Jones transcript page when I don't need to copy text...)
Good lord she said "pop, pop, pop" again... She apparently didn't listen to her own 911 call!
Zimmerman planned to kill someone that night. That's why he took a loaded gun with him. He stalked a kid whose only crimes were walking while black, wearing a hoodie in the rain and carrying ice tea and Skittles. He told the dispatcher he was stalking the kid. Later, he told the police he had stalked the kid and he told them he had murdered him.
The kid had every right to "stand his ground" and to defend himself but, of course, Skittles is no defense against a gun.
Since it was premeditated and since he confessed to premeditated murder, he should get the death penalty.
As to those who say its a hate crime, that he's a racist or that the kid deserved it because there are photos of him flipping the bird and that he smoked grass - bullshit on all counts.
Zimmmerman should be tried and punished on the facts of the case, not whether he's a racist or the kid was less than perfect.
Here is the relevant sections of the 911 call...
911 dispatcher:
Are you following him? [2:24]
Zimmerman:
Yeah. [2:25]
911 dispatcher:
OK.
We dont need you to do that. [2:26]
Zimmerman:
OK. [2:28]
911 dispatcher:
Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34]
Zimmerman:
George. He ran.
<skip ahead>
Zimmerman:
Its a home. Its 1950 oh, crap, I dont want to give it out I dont know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]
911 dispatcher:
OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]
George Zimmerman's 911 call transcribed - National unsolved cases | Examiner.com
^^(This site has pop-ups and video commercials...I use the Mother Jones transcript page when I don't need to copy text...)
"""911 dispatcher:
OK.
We dont need you to do that. [2:26]""
And this exact language (which causes some on here confusion) is based on the fact that dispatchers are not allowed to either direct or order callers to do anything, except wait for the police.
Uncensored does not believe in jury process, OK.
Uncensored would hang the jury if the other voted for conviction, regardless of what said the evidence.
Troll much, liar?