Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adam never existed. Now you know.C'mon brah, seriously. You think your god plopped down adam fully formed then took a rib and made eve?Was eve made from one of adam's ribs?but you are foolish to continue to make that same false claim.....I do believe in the Bible, I just reject your idiocy......
Why not? Makes more sense than the evolutionists claims that she was made out of some cesspool soup or from some fish that climbed up out of the ocean.
Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Adam never existed. Now you know.C'mon brah, seriously. You think your god plopped down adam fully formed then took a rib and made eve?Was eve made from one of adam's ribs?but you are foolish to continue to make that same false claim.....I do believe in the Bible, I just reject your idiocy......
Why not? Makes more sense than the evolutionists claims that she was made out of some cesspool soup or from some fish that climbed up out of the ocean.
Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Geological proof that a worldwide flood happened.Do you have any real scientific archeological evidence?So just make it up as you go along.The Hebrew language is also clear. 'Tebel' (the entire earth) was used in the creation story and the judgment of the earth. The word 'Kol' was used to describe all of a particular region. The word 'Tebel' does not occur in the flood account.
We can see that holding true in the flood account itself. Genesis 8:5 tells us that Noah could see the tops of the mountains. Four verses later it notes the dove returned to the Ark as water covered all the earth. If Noah could see mountain tops, then it follows all of the rest of the region was flooded--not all the earth, as mountains were no longer covered.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
Well duhhh. I would claim those Babylonian tablets to be scientific archeological evidence. What do you want, a Fox News report with eyewitness accounts?
I used the wrong term, I meant geological proof. A story isn't proof. Even written in stone.Geological proof that a worldwide flood happened.Do you have any real scientific archeological evidence?So just make it up as you go along.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
Well duhhh. I would claim those Babylonian tablets to be scientific archeological evidence. What do you want, a Fox News report with eyewitness accounts?
The Babylonia tablets are archeological proof.
How did I manage that?Adam never existed. Now you know.C'mon brah, seriously. You think your god plopped down adam fully formed then took a rib and made eve?Was eve made from one of adam's ribs?
Why not? Makes more sense than the evolutionists claims that she was made out of some cesspool soup or from some fish that climbed up out of the ocean.
Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
I used the wrong term, I meant geological proof. A story isn't proof. Even written in stone.Geological proof that a worldwide flood happened.Do you have any real scientific archeological evidence?Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
Well duhhh. I would claim those Babylonian tablets to be scientific archeological evidence. What do you want, a Fox News report with eyewitness accounts?
The Babylonia tablets are archeological proof.
How did I manage that?Adam never existed. Now you know.C'mon brah, seriously. You think your god plopped down adam fully formed then took a rib and made eve?Why not? Makes more sense than the evolutionists claims that she was made out of some cesspool soup or from some fish that climbed up out of the ocean.
Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
Umm, sorry. You're being silly. "Collecting literature" means stamp collecting.So just make it up as you go along.God's going to destroy all the land and dirt and all living, breathing things on it. That means the entire planet. It couldn't be any clearer.
The Hebrew language is also clear. 'Tebel' (the entire earth) was used in the creation story and the judgment of the earth. The word 'Kol' was used to describe all of a particular region. The word 'Tebel' does not occur in the flood account.
We can see that holding true in the flood account itself. Genesis 8:5 tells us that Noah could see the tops of the mountains. Four verses later it notes the dove returned to the Ark as water covered all the earth. If Noah could see mountain tops, then it follows all of the rest of the region was flooded--not all the earth, as mountains were no longer covered.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
Actually, that's not true. We have genealogical records going back much further than 6,000 years.How did I manage that?Adam never existed. Now you know.C'mon brah, seriously. You think your god plopped down adam fully formed then took a rib and made eve?
Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
We have the oldest known recorded genealogical record right there in the Bible. Read it.
Umm, sorry. You're being silly. "Collecting literature" means stamp collecting.So just make it up as you go along.God's going to destroy all the land and dirt and all living, breathing things on it. That means the entire planet. It couldn't be any clearer.
The Hebrew language is also clear. 'Tebel' (the entire earth) was used in the creation story and the judgment of the earth. The word 'Kol' was used to describe all of a particular region. The word 'Tebel' does not occur in the flood account.
We can see that holding true in the flood account itself. Genesis 8:5 tells us that Noah could see the tops of the mountains. Four verses later it notes the dove returned to the Ark as water covered all the earth. If Noah could see mountain tops, then it follows all of the rest of the region was flooded--not all the earth, as mountains were no longer covered.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
If you want literature, have at it: Flood Stories from Around the World
Many cultures have flood stories but those are not connected to the tales and fables of the bibles.
Yes. Everyone has a flood story. Nothing in the link connects those stories to biblical takes and fables.
So, how is it that civilizations and cultures existing at the time of Noah's alleged pleasure cruise have no record of any flood?[/QUOT
Both Postmordern and I have totally shot that claim of your down over and over again. Can't you at least be honest. You claimed the Mayans were from before the flood and I showed you they were not. You will perjury yourself to try to prove your points. You are a dishonest camper.
Actually, that's not true. We have genealogical records going back much further than 6,000 years.How did I manage that?Adam never existed. Now you know.Do you seriously believe Adam was once a bird or a fish? I'm no more insane than you.
Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
We have the oldest known recorded genealogical record right there in the Bible. Read it.
Not at all, LOL!!Umm, sorry. You're being silly. "Collecting literature" means stamp collecting.So just make it up as you go along.God's going to destroy all the land and dirt and all living, breathing things on it. That means the entire planet. It couldn't be any clearer.
The Hebrew language is also clear. 'Tebel' (the entire earth) was used in the creation story and the judgment of the earth. The word 'Kol' was used to describe all of a particular region. The word 'Tebel' does not occur in the flood account.
We can see that holding true in the flood account itself. Genesis 8:5 tells us that Noah could see the tops of the mountains. Four verses later it notes the dove returned to the Ark as water covered all the earth. If Noah could see mountain tops, then it follows all of the rest of the region was flooded--not all the earth, as mountains were no longer covered.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
If you want literature, have at it: Flood Stories from Around the World
Many cultures have flood stories but those are not connected to the tales and fables of the bibles.
And we are just simply prohibited to even guess from where they got such stories. LOL!!
Actually, that's not true. We have genealogical records going back much further than 6,000 years.How did I manage that?Adam never existed. Now you know.
Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
We have the oldest known recorded genealogical record right there in the Bible. Read it.
Possibly but I haven't seen one. Why don't you offer a link?
Not at all, LOL!!Umm, sorry. You're being silly. "Collecting literature" means stamp collecting.So just make it up as you go along.The Hebrew language is also clear. 'Tebel' (the entire earth) was used in the creation story and the judgment of the earth. The word 'Kol' was used to describe all of a particular region. The word 'Tebel' does not occur in the flood account.
We can see that holding true in the flood account itself. Genesis 8:5 tells us that Noah could see the tops of the mountains. Four verses later it notes the dove returned to the Ark as water covered all the earth. If Noah could see mountain tops, then it follows all of the rest of the region was flooded--not all the earth, as mountains were no longer covered.
As the fable has no hard data to support it, believe whatever you wish.
Yes indeed. People from all over the world just simply dreamed up a story of the flood all on their own. You gotta be kidding me.
There is much archaeological evidence confirming the Flood of Noah. There is a tablet in Babylon on which one of the Babylonian kings mentions his enjoyment in reading the writings of those who lived before the Flood. Another Babylonian tablet gives an interesting confirmation. Noah was the tenth generation from Adam according to the Bible, and this Babylonian tablet names the ten kings of Babylon who lived before the Flood. Another tablet names all the kings of Babylon, and after the first ten there are the words: “The Deluge came up. . .”
Stories of the Nochian Flood have been found in almost every civilization in the world. Dr. Aaron Smith of the University of Greensboro collected a complete history of the literature on Noah’s Ark. He found 80,000 works in 72 languages about the flood. About 70,000 of them mention the wreckage of the Ark.
If you want literature, have at it: Flood Stories from Around the World
Many cultures have flood stories but those are not connected to the tales and fables of the bibles.
And we are just simply prohibited to even guess from where they got such stories. LOL!!
The stories derive from the result of glacier and snow melt at the end of the last Ice Age 15,000 to 12,000 years ago.
There's no need to introduce angry gawds and Arks when science and the geologic record provide testable answers.
Actually, that's not true. We have genealogical records going back much further than 6,000 years.How did I manage that?Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
We have the oldest known recorded genealogical record right there in the Bible. Read it.
Possibly but I haven't seen one. Why don't you offer a link?
Fossil Hominids mitochondrial DNA
Yes. Everyone has a flood story. Nothing in the link connects those stories to biblical takes and fables.
So, how is it that civilizations and cultures existing at the time of Noah's alleged pleasure cruise have no record of any flood?[/QUOT
Both Postmordern and I have totally shot that claim of your down over and over again. Can't you at least be honest. You claimed the Mayans were from before the flood and I showed you they were not. You will perjury yourself to try to prove your points. You are a dishonest camper.
Actually, that's not true. We have genealogical records going back much further than 6,000 years.How did I manage that?Then according to you, neither did King David, Abraham, Jacob, the Christ, James, Jude, Queen Elizabeth, etc., etc. You just wiped out all of history.
We have the oldest known recorded genealogical record right there in the Bible. Read it.
Possibly but I haven't seen one. Why don't you offer a link?
Fossil Hominids mitochondrial DNA
