Question about Shanksville crash

[CurveLight]

Why is it you don't question a first responder when they say something you like but if a first responder says something you don't like you automatically claim that person was obviously wrong? Oh thass right.....it's cause you swim in hypocrisy.

You've never proven 95% was recovered and you never will you lying ****

why is it when a first responder says they heard an explosion you twoofers say its proof of controlled demolition? its isnt necessarily the first responders i question. its more that you fucking twoofers draw illogical conclusions from what they say.

i have provided proof that 95% was recovered, a statement by the FBI saying so. you dont like it. tough shit for you. it doesnt mean i didnt provide proof, jackass!!

You provided a claim 95% was recovered. You've provided no facts you dumfuk.

 

[CurveLight]

And just for the whiney little children who cannot look up pictures on the Internet. Even though we know that id-eots and bentdick will claim these are not what they are. I have spent way too much time on these simpletons. Now go on and tell us how these are not pictures of debris from flight 93.


1 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200060-1.jpg

2 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200061-1.jpg

3 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200062-1.jpg

4 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200063-1.jpg

5 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200064-1.jpg

6 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200065-1.jpg

7 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200066-1.jpg

8 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200068-1.jpg

9 http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_P200069-1.jpg

10 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/aerial_diagram_small.jpg

11 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_wtae1_small.jpg

12 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_wtae2_small.jpg

13 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_wtae3.jpg

14 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_wtae4.jpg

15. http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_pc1_small.jpg

16 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_pc2_small.jpg

17 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_about_small.jpg

18 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris_rj.jpg

19 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa1.jpg

20 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa2.jpg

21 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa3.jpg

22 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa4.jpg

23 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa5.jpg

24 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-epa6.jpg

25 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/debris-pitt5.jpg

26 http://killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/gallery/misc-epa4.jpg

27 http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/photos/docs/epa/EPA11.jpg

28 http://www.post-gazette.com/images4/20060806wap_Flight93_450.jpg

29 http://www.ooze.com/finger/assets/images/Fingerstatue.jpg

OLLIE! #29 was terrific. A perfect tribute to a lying fuck like benttwat.

Thank you, I thought so. He is too stupid to even see the debris on a barn roof. Almost a pity.

So you can't back up your claims....again. No problem old timer.....I never expected you to do so anyways.

 

[DiveCon]

Why is it you don't question a first responder when they say something you like but if a first responder says something you don't like you automatically claim that person was obviously wrong? Oh thass right.....it's cause you swim in hypocrisy.

You've never proven 95% was recovered and you never will you lying ****

why is it when a first responder says they heard an explosion you twoofers say its proof of controlled demolition? its isnt necessarily the first responders i question. its more that you fucking twoofers draw illogical conclusions from what they say.

i have provided proof that 95% was recovered, a statement by the FBI saying so. you dont like it. tough shit for you. it doesnt mean i didnt provide proof, jackass!!

You provided a claim 95% was recovered. You've provided no facts you dumfuk.

what a fucking dipshit
he cited the FACT that the FBI(working with the NTSB) said they recovered 95%
THAT is a FACT
the FBI DID say it

 

[CurveLight]

why is it when a first responder says they heard an explosion you twoofers say its proof of controlled demolition? its isnt necessarily the first responders i question. its more that you fucking twoofers draw illogical conclusions from what they say.

i have provided proof that 95% was recovered, a statement by the FBI saying so. you dont like it. tough shit for you. it doesnt mean i didnt provide proof, jackass!!

You provided a claim 95% was recovered. You've provided no facts you dumfuk.

what a fucking dipshit
he cited the FACT that the FBI(working with the NTSB) said they recovered 95%
THAT is a FACT
the FBI DID say it

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

 

[Fizz]

You provided a claim 95% was recovered. You've provided no facts you dumfuk.

what a fucking dipshit
he cited the FACT that the FBI(working with the NTSB) said they recovered 95%
THAT is a FACT
the FBI DID say it

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

its a FACT the fbi says 95% was recovered. squirm some more little boy and tell me how i have no facts to back up my claim.

fucking moronic twoofer.

 

[CurveLight]

what a fucking dipshit
he cited the FACT that the FBI(working with the NTSB) said they recovered 95%
THAT is a FACT
the FBI DID say it

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

its a FACT the fbi says 95% was recovered. squirm some more little boy and tell me how i have no facts to back up my claim.

fucking moronic twoofer.

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

 

[Liability]

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

its a FACT the fbi says 95% was recovered. squirm some more little boy and tell me how i have no facts to back up my claim.

fucking moronic twoofer.

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

CLAIM: relevant portion of definition = 2b: "an assertion open to challenge <a claim of authenticity>" Claim - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

 

[CurveLight]

its a FACT the fbi says 95% was recovered. squirm some more little boy and tell me how i have no facts to back up my claim.

fucking moronic twoofer.

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

CLAIM: relevant portion of definition = 2b: "an assertion open to challenge <a claim of authenticity>" Claim - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Rotfl! Thank you for proving my point Snitch Bitch!

"an assertion open to challenge.."

 

[Liability]

What was mysterious about:

You provided a claim 95% was recovered.

You be one stoopid bitch.

CLAIM: relevant portion of definition = 2b: "an assertion open to challenge <a claim of authenticity>" Claim - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Rotfl! Thank you for proving my point Snitch Bitch!

"an assertion open to challenge.."

Only a complete imbecile (thus explaining why you are the one) would consider my refutation of your mindless position to be some kind of vindication of your mindless position.

Any contention is open to challenge, you fucking retard asshole.

You deliberately (like the pussy you always are) EVADED the last question, I note. No surprise. So, to highlight your abject cowardice, I'll just pose it again for your benefit:

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

 

[HUGGY]

snitch bitch!!!?? Wtf???

 

[HUGGY]

Why Liability gotta be the "Snitch Bitch"?

 

[CurveLight]

Why Liability gotta be the "Snitch Bitch"?

Cause he runs to staff like a Snitch Bitch every chance he gets......

 

[HUGGY]

Ya all know what happens to "snitch Bitches"?

I'd work on my grip if I was you....so ya don't drop the soap in your shower.

 

[candycorn]

Ya all know what happens to "snitch Bitches"?

I'd work on my grip if I was you....so ya don't drop the soap in your shower.

Thanks for letting us in on what you do in your spare time.

 

[Liability]

Why Liability gotta be the "Snitch Bitch"?

Cause he runs to staff like a Snitch Bitch every chance he gets......

Now there's ^ something you see every day. PussyPuddle, the pussy liar, lying some more.

 

[CurveLight]

CLAIM: relevant portion of definition = 2b: "an assertion open to challenge <a claim of authenticity>" Claim - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Rotfl! Thank you for proving my point Snitch Bitch!

"an assertion open to challenge.."

Only a complete imbecile (thus explaining why you are the one) would consider my refutation of your mindless position to be some kind of vindication of your mindless position.

Any contention is open to challenge, you fucking retard asshole.

You deliberately (like the pussy you always are) EVADED the last question, I note. No surprise. So, to highlight your abject cowardice, I'll just pose it again for your benefit:

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Not surprising you don't know the diff.

A claims lacks verification.

A fact can be independently verified.

If a calendar expert says today is Tuesday by our calendar you don't need to rely on believing him or not because you can independently verify his claim. Thus it is no longer simply a claim but a verifiable fact.

(I really hope you aren't stoopid enough to respond with...."But how does anyone know what day of the week it is for a fact?" I hope....but you have proven to be that stoopid Snitch Bitch.)

 

[candycorn]

Why Liability gotta be the "Snitch Bitch"?

Cause he runs to staff like a Snitch Bitch every chance he gets......

Now there's ^ something you see every day. PussyPuddle, the pussy liar, lying some more.

Hey...at least he finally took a stand on something. Thats a first for him.

 

[Liability]

Rotfl! Thank you for proving my point Snitch Bitch!

"an assertion open to challenge.."

Only a complete imbecile (thus explaining why you are the one) would consider my refutation of your mindless position to be some kind of vindication of your mindless position.

Any contention is open to challenge, you fucking retard asshole.

You deliberately (like the pussy you always are) EVADED the last question, I note. No surprise. So, to highlight your abject cowardice, I'll just pose it again for your benefit:

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Not surprising you don't know the diff.

A claims lacks verification.

A fact can be independently verified.

If a calendar expert says today is Tuesday by our calendar you don't need to rely on believing him or not because you can independently verify his claim. Thus it is no longer simply a claim but a verifiable fact.

(I really hope you aren't stoopid enough to respond with...."But how does anyone know what day of the week it is for a fact?" I hope....but you have proven to be that stoopid Snitch Bitch.)

Totally as expected, your abiding ignorance is now on full display, PussyPuddle. Thanks for playing.

Facts can be verified. Happily, you got a portion of it right, so far!

Now, tell us some of the ways in which facts can be verified, you fucking moron.



{For those keeping score at home, the fun part of the ensuing portion of today's PussyPuddle desperate effort to avoid getting pinned down will be largely in the realm of how urgently and irrationally he tries to avoid acknowledging that facts can be verified by the accounts of eye-witnesses!}

 

[DiveCon]

Only a complete imbecile (thus explaining why you are the one) would consider my refutation of your mindless position to be some kind of vindication of your mindless position.

Any contention is open to challenge, you fucking retard asshole.

You deliberately (like the pussy you always are) EVADED the last question, I note. No surprise. So, to highlight your abject cowardice, I'll just pose it again for your benefit:

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Not surprising you don't know the diff.

A claims lacks verification.

A fact can be independently verified.

If a calendar expert says today is Tuesday by our calendar you don't need to rely on believing him or not because you can independently verify his claim. Thus it is no longer simply a claim but a verifiable fact.

(I really hope you aren't stoopid enough to respond with...."But how does anyone know what day of the week it is for a fact?" I hope....but you have proven to be that stoopid Snitch Bitch.)

Totally as expected, your abiding ignorance is now on full display, PussyPuddle. Thanks for playing.

Facts can be verified. Happily, you got a portion of it right, so far!

Now, tell us some of the ways in which facts can be verified, you fucking moron.



{For those keeping score at home, the fun part of the ensuing portion of today's PussyPuddle desperate effort to avoid getting pinned down will be largely in the realm of how urgently and irrationally he tries to avoid acknowledging that facts can be verified by the accounts of eye-witnesses!}

i'm still waiting for him to say who would be more qualified to answer the question on the crash than the lead investigative body

 

[CurveLight]

Only a complete imbecile (thus explaining why you are the one) would consider my refutation of your mindless position to be some kind of vindication of your mindless position.

Any contention is open to challenge, you fucking retard asshole.

You deliberately (like the pussy you always are) EVADED the last question, I note. No surprise. So, to highlight your abject cowardice, I'll just pose it again for your benefit:

So tell us, PussyPuddle, what SPECIFICALLY distinguishes a "fact" from a "claim" about a fact, in your lexicon?

Not surprising you don't know the diff.

A claims lacks verification.

A fact can be independently verified.

If a calendar expert says today is Tuesday by our calendar you don't need to rely on believing him or not because you can independently verify his claim. Thus it is no longer simply a claim but a verifiable fact.

(I really hope you aren't stoopid enough to respond with...."But how does anyone know what day of the week it is for a fact?" I hope....but you have proven to be that stoopid Snitch Bitch.)

Totally as expected, your abiding ignorance is now on full display, PussyPuddle. Thanks for playing.

Facts can be verified. Happily, you got a portion of it right, so far!

Now, tell us some of the ways in which facts can be verified, you fucking moron.



{For those keeping score at home, the fun part of the ensuing portion of today's PussyPuddle desperate effort to avoid getting pinned down will be largely in the realm of how urgently and irrationally he tries to avoid acknowledging that facts can be verified by the accounts of eye-witnesses!}

Holy fuk Snitch Bitch. Do you think.....maybe.....just maybe......there is a reason why it is called eyewitness testimony and not eyewitness fact? Lol.....

All this to simply avoid admitting the obvious....you don't have a single fact supporting the fbi's claim. What a Snitch Bitch!