Question I've Always Wondered: Why is the Left So Adamant about Abortion Remaining Legal?

[busybee01]

Your side equates anyone who was there with the trespass and the violence on some of the police.
Your side called in an insurrection when there WAS NO CHANCE OF OVERTURNING THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT IN PLACE AT THE TIME. Your side give Molotov cocktail throwing lefty thugs two years for firebombing police vehicles while throwing the book at Jan 6th people for fucking trespass.

None of your shit is accurate, it's lies mixed with attempts at being slick, and please go fuck yourself with an AIDS infested flaming tire iron.

The fact is that police officers were attacked, and several were very seriously injured.
The goal of the Jan 6 attack was to strop the certification of the election. That is sedition.
The Jan 6 attackers got off very lightly. Even federal judges appointed by Republicans have co0mmented on this.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

But even assuming it is constitutional to ban all abortions regardless of term or pregnancy or rape or incest .... seriously, what is the govt's interest in banning the morning after pill?

If the Govt decides that conception is the time that human rights start then the morning after pill would be just as illegal as an abortion 3 weeks later.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What does science say? Is it inconclusive? If so, doesn't it make sense to err on the side of life vs not?

I do not think science can give the answer, it is not in the realm of science to define "personhood"

 

[Mashmont]

Your "Power to Decide" statistics are incorrect and designed to promote a point of view that just isn't working, and completely ignores the reasons WHY women chose abortion:

The most telling stat that is NOT listed on leftwing Guttmacher's profile is 84% of abortions are had by single women. These are people who shouldn't be having sex anyway. THAT is the true underlying problem, and sex outside marriage is also encouraged by the Marxist leadership and for the same reason; to break down the family.

 

[busybee01]

Science denier.

You are looking at yourself in the mirror again.

 

[DBA]

The trouble is that birth control could be next on the list to ban.

Ah, the scare tactics of the left. Typical.

Overturning Roe v Wade does not make abortion illegal. It turns the issue over to the states. Don't worry, if you live in a wacky far-left blue state, I am sure you will still be allowed to kill your baby up until birth or whenever he/she becomes too much of a burden after birth.

 

[busybee01]

What does science say? Is it inconclusive? If so, doesn't it make sense to err on the side of life vs not?

No it does not. A fetus that cannot survive outside of the womb is not a life.

 

[DBA]

I do not think science can give the answer, it is not in the realm of science to define "personhood"

Exactly why my point stands.

 

[BS Filter]

Your "Power to Decide" statistics are incorrect and designed to promote a point of view that just isn't working, and completely ignores the reasons WHY women chose abortion:

Why don't you idiots choose birth control and the morning after pill. They're free everywhere.

 

[DBA]

No it does not. A fetus that cannot survive outside of the womb is not a life.

Are you are against abortion when the fetus is able to survive outside the womb?

 

[Mashmont]

But even assuming it is constitutional to ban all abortions regardless of term or pregnancy or rape or incest .... seriously, what is the govt's interest in banning the morning after pill? A law HAS TO BE rationally related to a legit govt interest. What is the govt's interest when a woman had too much to drink one night and had unprotected sex, so she wants to use chemicals/hormones to prevent the possibility that even if an egg possibly got fertilized it attaches in the uterus and is not expelled as often occurs in nature?

That's easy. It is and should be in the government interest to promote morality. Killing little babies in the womb is immoral.

 

[BS Filter]

No it does not. A fetus that cannot survive outside of the womb is not a life.

So? Allow the human to live in the womb until birth and it still needs attention. You have no point, just parroting propaganda.

 

[Mashmont]

Why don't you idiots choose birth control and the morning after pill. They're free everywhere.

The morning after abortion pill should be outlawed as well. No question.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Ah, the scare tactics of the left. Typical.

Overturning Roe v Wade does not make abortion illegal. It turns the issue over to the states.

And the same logic used for RvW was used for birth control, same sex marriage and interracial marriage by the SCOTUS.

 

[busybee01]

Ah, the scare tactics of the left. Typical.

Overturning Roe v Wade does not make abortion illegal. It turns the issue over to the states. Don't worry, if you live in a wacky far-left blue state, I am sure you will still be allowed to kill your baby up until birth or whenever he/she becomes too much of a burden after birth.

It is a fact.

Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves (R) on Sunday refused to rule out the possibility that his state would ban certain forms of contraception, sidestepping questions about what would happen next if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

• Republican legislators in Louisiana are working on an abortion ban that would “arguably criminalize in vitro fertilization and forms of birth control.”
• Republican legislators in Idaho are currently weighing new restrictions on some forms of contraception.
• Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee recently denounced Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case that struck down a state law that restricted married couples’ access to birth control.
• Each of the Republican candidates running for state attorney general in Michigan also denounced the Griswold precedent.
• Blake Masters, a Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Arizona, not only denounced the Griswold precedent, he’s told voters that he’ll only vote to confirm judges who agree with him.

For some in GOP, contraception restrictions aren’t off the table

For many years, contraception simply wasn’t a major political issue in the United States. There are plenty of reasons to believe that may soon change.

www.msnbc.com

MSN

 

[Mashmont]

It really is incredible the sell job done by the Marxists, convincing many stupid women that killing their own offspring was not only acceptable, it is also desirable.
Although the approval numbers the leftwing pollsters put out are exaggerated. I would say if you asked "Do you think it's OK to kill little babies in the womb", less than 30% would say yes. But if you mislead by asking "Do you think women's reproductive rights should be protected", then the moron segment of the population would put the approval number at 60%.

 

[busybee01]

The morning after abortion pill should be outlawed as well. No question.

No it should not be you fascist pig.

 

[busybee01]

Ah, the scare tactics of the left. Typical.

Overturning Roe v Wade does not make abortion illegal. It turns the issue over to the states. Don't worry, if you live in a wacky far-left blue state, I am sure you will still be allowed to kill your baby up until birth or whenever he/she becomes too much of a burden after birth.

No one is killing babies. Women have a right to control their bodies.

 

[DBA]

And the same logic used for RvW was used for birth control, same sex marriage and interracial marriage by the SCOTUS.

IMO, these are also issues that should be decided at the state level by more locally elected representatives. Less power at the federal level and more local representation are good things in my book. The US is a very large country. The values, in general, of people in CA are very different from the values of people in MS.

 

[jc456]

As I said, strong opinions on bodily autonomy.

Fetus is not the woman’s body