Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's see, apparently the young men weren't raped in a technical sense although women in the same situation would no doubt be considered to be victims of rape. He merely ruined the mental stability of young men because he was a homosexual predator. He never admitted to being homosexual and he managed to work himself into a position of authority over young men. The bi-polar left seems outraged that he would get away with such criminal conduct but on the other hand they hate the BSA for being unwilling to risk the mental and physical health of boys by hiring overt homosexuals as counselors.
Actually, no, that isn't my point at all. See #94 above (whitehall): "The bi-polar left seems outraged that he would get away with such criminal conduct but on the other hand they hate the BSA for being unwilling to risk the mental and physical health of boys by hiring overt homosexuals as counselors. "
That is the point.
That would be a lot easier to take, if you weren't saying the exact opposite in this thread...do you maintain that the pastor wasn't homosexual? Or are you maintaining he wasn't a threat to children? Which is it?
The facts are..
1. This is not a current event.
2. This is not a case of pedophilia.
3. All but one of the victims were of age.
4. The thread title is deliberately misleading.
5. The thread was deliberately planted in the current events forum to make it appear it is current, when it's not.
6. The judge in this case is a liberal.
7. The sole purpose of this thread is to attack Christians, but it is the most recent garbage the OP could find...so he recycled it and painted it up so it would look like it's recent.
8. The same behavior among non-christian populations (schools, for example) is encouraged and lauded as "brave".
How does the left balance their hatred of the Boy Scouts of America for being able to refuse to hire homosexuals when they see this kind of stuff?
He did not self-identify as a homosexual, you know.
Actually, no, that isn't my point at all. See #94 above (whitehall): "The bi-polar left seems outraged that he would get away with such criminal conduct but on the other hand they hate the BSA for being unwilling to risk the mental and physical health of boys by hiring overt homosexuals as counselors. "
That is the point.
The whole point, idiot, is that homosexuals are NOT a danger to children so that argument fails. Your fear is based on your rank ignorance.
That would be a lot easier to take, if you weren't saying the exact opposite in this thread...do you maintain that the pastor wasn't homosexual? Or are you maintaining he wasn't a threat to children? Which is it?
Are you really THIS fucking stupid?
His sexual orientation has nothing to do with his crime.
How does the left balance their hatred of the Boy Scouts of America for being able to refuse to hire homosexuals when they see this kind of stuff?
He did not self-identify as a homosexual, you know.
A man diddling little boys is by definition a homosexual.
That would be a lot easier to take, if you weren't saying the exact opposite in this thread...do you maintain that the pastor wasn't homosexual? Or are you maintaining he wasn't a threat to children? Which is it?
Are you really THIS fucking stupid?
His sexual orientation has nothing to do with his crime.
It had a lot to do with the victims he chose.
So we watch Whitehall and Koshergrl mangle the facts, distort the event, and push agendas despite all of the evidence.
How you figure the radical left? They absolutely hate the BSA for having the right to prohibit homosexuals from supervising boys but they are outraged that a homosexual predator was not given more time in prison for molesting boys.
Who says the pastor was a homosexual?