Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama spent over $300 billion dollars the day after they raised the debt-ceiling.
WTF?????
U.S. National Debt Over $17 Trillion - Surges $328 Billion In A Single Day | SilverDoctors.com
Perhaps now this great nation can move ahead, out of the Senate Repub filibuster morass, and do the people's work, FOR WHICH THEY ARE PAID I might add.
Harry Reid did this so that they can get activist Judges in the D. C. court.
The counter by Repubs should be, if they get the Senate in 2014 and keep the House, is to write legislation that would bring up Judges to a review board when they make their own laws like they are doing now and then can get fired for doing that.
The problem with this is President Obama would veto it.
So they would have to do this when they would get a Repub President maybe in 2016.
So name them. Which "activist judges" have been being held up?
Comelia Pillard
Patricia Millett
Robert Wilkins
Democrats will always have that advantage, and the reason for that is the way the two parties look at government in the first place.
Liberals have a significant affection for and devotion to government, a romantic notion of We The People all working together in a collective to make things better. The government, of course, is the instrument of that effort, so it's natural and easy for them to promote its power and influence at all times., and they're very passionate about it.
Conservatives don't share that affection or devotion, so they're essentially working at a disadvantage right off. So their challenge - and it may be too late at this point - is to convince Americans that the individual has the ability to improve their own lives. That's much tougher sell, an eat-your-vegetables message that must be phrased carefully.
Unfortunately for the GOP, too many of its messengers over the last several years don't appreciate how carefully that message must be delivered, and instead have gone with a simplistic, absolutist approach that has damaged the party by alienating many.
The party had better learn how to deliver its message more effectively before it's too late.
.
Here's the way to rid this country of liberals. Let obama have everything he wants. within five years people will wake up when obamas failed policy starts taking more money than they make.
the only time we've lost money in our jobs and life was under republican rule ... when we made money up the ass it was under democrat regulations and tax increases ... never under any republican in office ...
Liberty Counsel, as part of the National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters, recently signed a letter urging the the U.S. Senate leadership "to end the judicial filibusters at the earliest possible moment and well before a Supreme Court vacancy should occur." The letter also pointed out that "while it is the right of the President to expect the Senate to give Advice and Consent within a reasonable period of time, it is the duty of every Senator to offer Advice and Consent through an honest, up or down vote."
A number of Republican senators still remain opposed or undecided on the issue. We have compiled a list you can use to call the Senators and ask them to end the judicial filibusters.
Washington, DC – Today, Senator Harry Reid invoked the “nuclear option” on judicial nominations, not including nominations to the Supreme Court. Under the new rules change, a judicial nominee does not need to meet the 60-vote cloture threshold and can be confirmed by a simple majority vote.
“Today’s action by Harry Reid is frightening, and every freedom-loving American should be deeply concerned,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel…
Really? how about when obama was a junior half ass senator? Shut the fuck up bitch.
Note the date:
July 11, 2013, 2:48 PM EDT20915
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) launched a barn-burner of a speech Thursday on the Senate floor, excoriating Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for continued obstruction when it comes to presidential nominees. He escalated the battle by setting up test votes next week on a series of potentially controversial nominees.
"Senator McConnell broke his word," Reid said. "The Republican leader has failed to live up to his commitments. He's failed to do what he said he would do -- move nominations by regular order except in extraordinary circumstances. I refuse to unilaterally surrender my right to respond to this breach of faith."
Did Reid act in good faith on allowing Republicans to have say in amendments? That was an acknowledged problem. Both sides promised to do better. Reid didn't keep up his part of the deal either.
There was no excuse for Reid to break his 2008 promise to the people who would be voting for him. Democrats' current overreach was their reaction to the damage done by their last overreach. They saw their polls falling in response to revelations about their abuse and they decided the solution was more abuse. We'll see how well that goes over.
"It is a disturbing trend when Republicans are willing to block executive branch nominees even if they have no objection about the qualification of the nominee," Reid said. "They're blocking qualified nominees because they refuse to accept the law of the land."
They may or may not be qualified, but what about those who legislate from the bench?
You fucking traitor.
And I'll raise you obamacare now go play in the middle of the road."It is a disturbing trend when Republicans are willing to block executive branch nominees even if they have no objection about the qualification of the nominee," Reid said. "They're blocking qualified nominees because they refuse to accept the law of the land."
They may or may not be qualified, but what about those who legislate from the bench?
You fucking traitor.
Like Citizens United?
You're not smart enough to debate me. Now go play with your plumber's putty.
Really? how about when obama was a junior half ass senator? Shut the fuck up bitch.
You are more than unusually excited for a Saturday morning.
Seriously son (bigderpnc1775). Get out of the politics sub-forum if all you're going to do is fling poo![]()
"It is a disturbing trend when Republicans are willing to block executive branch nominees even if they have no objection about the qualification of the nominee," Reid said. "They're blocking qualified nominees because they refuse to accept the law of the land."
They may or may not be qualified, but what about those who legislate from the bench?
You fucking traitor.
Like Citizens United?
You're not smart enough to debate me. Now go play with your plumber's putty.
Hey dumb ass how in the hell can you say that you remember when, when you weren't even a member here back in 2005? You are a lying sack of shit.Wow...they said that?!? And then go on to filibuster President Obama's nominees to an unprecedented degree and then get pissed when Harry Reid enacts reform? Sheesh, it's like they're rank hypocrites or something.
I remember being on a different board back in 2005, and conservative opposition to the filibustering of judges was practically unanimous;
now look at this board, gee, can't imagine why conservative opinion has done a complete 180...
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 37,697
Thanks: 616
Thanked 7,135 Times in 5,370 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1839
Or are you comparing two different boards?
He thinks we're as stupid as he is.It's the same time. 8:16. You made an edit cause you realized you fucked up when you said "Hey dumb ass how in the hell can you say that you remember when, when you weren't even a member here back in 2005?" and called him a liar.Can;t read very good, kenya?
No you can't read try again and look at the edit time and your post time shit stain.
You don't think we can see that?
![]()
Note the date:
July 11, 2013, 2:48 PM EDT20915
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) launched a barn-burner of a speech Thursday on the Senate floor, excoriating Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for continued obstruction when it comes to presidential nominees. He escalated the battle by setting up test votes next week on a series of potentially controversial nominees.
"Senator McConnell broke his word," Reid said. "The Republican leader has failed to live up to his commitments. He's failed to do what he said he would do -- move nominations by regular order except in extraordinary circumstances. I refuse to unilaterally surrender my right to respond to this breach of faith."
Did Reid act in good faith on allowing Republicans to have say in amendments? That was an acknowledged problem. Both sides promised to do better. Reid didn't keep up his part of the deal either.
There was no excuse for Reid to break his 2008 promise to the people who would be voting for him. Democrats' current overreach was their reaction to the damage done by their last overreach. They saw their polls falling in response to revelations about their abuse and they decided the solution was more abuse. We'll see how well that goes over.
Reid was not going to let them sabotage the ACA. That was their intent with the amendments.
If Reid broke a campaign promise, it's no one's business except the voters of Nevada.
They may or may not be qualified, but what about those who legislate from the bench?
You fucking traitor.
Like Citizens United?
You're not smart enough to debate me. Now go play with your plumber's putty.
Strange you couldn't retort what Bigreb posted, just an attack on him....me thinks you got nothing.![]()
Perhaps now this great nation can move ahead, out of the Senate Repub filibuster morass, and do the people's work, FOR WHICH THEY ARE PAID I might add.