Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you act as if any 1 issue is enough to not support someone.I think you should get a freakin brain. There is no infanticide. You are either lying or stupid.Actually, I think Conservative Christians should all embrace the party that sanctions infanticide, and gay marriage, promotes sloth, envy, sexual promiscuity, reproductive irresponsibility, and greed, abhors traditional marriage and sexuality, and is openly antagonistic to traditional religious institutions, demanding that they accept their perverted world view or lose their tax-exempt status.
Don't you?
Gay people are God/s children, why do you want to discriminate against them?
Sexual Promiscuity? A Trump supporter obviously has not problem with that one.
Seems to me, taking away access to birth control & then crying about sexual responsibility is really hypocritical.
Which party backs corporate greed???? Which party demands workers get $7/hr while CEO's get billions?
We have a separation of church & state. If a Church starts a businsss then it follows the same rules. Quit using religion to sanctify bigotry & hate. anmd if your church ewasnts to be political, then rthey can paty fucking tazxers.
.
You are a hate spewing bigoted POS and certainly no Christian
it's entirely possible to disagree with someone AND still support them. why do you have to apply binary thinking to every situation?
Because it suits his worldview, in particular it supports his desire to marginalize anyone who thinks differently than he does.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.A church is not a business knuckleheadA business is not a citizen and does not have religious rights
If it wants to close on Sunday or any other day, they are entitled. If they want to discriminate they must follow the law
A person still retains constitutional rights even if they want to sell something. Nice strawman attempt, but fail.
So Churches can be forced to perform Same sex wedding ceremonies?
A person can hate any group he wants. But once he opens a business, that BUSINESS must comply with local laws
Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.A church is not a business knuckleheadA person still retains constitutional rights even if they want to sell something. Nice strawman attempt, but fail.
So Churches can be forced to perform Same sex wedding ceremonies?
A person can hate any group he wants. But once he opens a business, that BUSINESS must comply with local laws
Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
Where outside of the Old Testament. What did Jesus say about homosexuality?
you act as if any 1 issue is enough to not support someone.I think you should get a freakin brain. There is no infanticide. You are either lying or stupid.Actually, I think Conservative Christians should all embrace the party that sanctions infanticide, and gay marriage, promotes sloth, envy, sexual promiscuity, reproductive irresponsibility, and greed, abhors traditional marriage and sexuality, and is openly antagonistic to traditional religious institutions, demanding that they accept their perverted world view or lose their tax-exempt status.
Don't you?
Gay people are God/s children, why do you want to discriminate against them?
Sexual Promiscuity? A Trump supporter obviously has not problem with that one.
Seems to me, taking away access to birth control & then crying about sexual responsibility is really hypocritical.
Which party backs corporate greed???? Which party demands workers get $7/hr while CEO's get billions?
We have a separation of church & state. If a Church starts a businsss then it follows the same rules. Quit using religion to sanctify bigotry & hate. anmd if your church ewasnts to be political, then rthey can paty fucking tazxers.
.
You are a hate spewing bigoted POS and certainly no Christian
it's entirely possible to disagree with someone AND still support them. why do you have to apply binary thinking to every situation?
Because it suits his worldview, in particular it supports his desire to marginalize anyone who thinks differently than he does.
If you think racist, themn you betcha you should be marginalized.
If you think bigotry, if you think the President should be able to lie all the time, if you think being a business cheat is OK, if you think it is OK to cheat on your wife & newborn baby yea you should be marginalized.
In the past you assfucks had a God damn fit if a Democrat did anything like that.
But it's Trump & you reman silent.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.A church is not a business knuckleheadA person still retains constitutional rights even if they want to sell something. Nice strawman attempt, but fail.
So Churches can be forced to perform Same sex wedding ceremonies?
A person can hate any group he wants. But once he opens a business, that BUSINESS must comply with local laws
Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
Actually, the prohibition on homosexual acts, if one is Christian or Jewish and adheres to these writings, is surrounded by other prohibitions of other behaviors, and mandates for other behaviors, which are no longer followed. I would expect a Christian who is fundamentalist to adhere to everything in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Line by line. Do you do this? Have you ever actually read these books?
religion has been around as long as mankind has been around.Who the fuck cares? Religion is dying and will continue to die a slow, miserable death. I'm incredibly grateful for the slow, inexorable demise of that garbage they call "Christianity". Now if only we could get rid of the cancer known as "Islam", I could die a happy man.
Yet STILL, as much as I despise religion, I would not prohibit people from practicing if I were World Emperor. Yet they (the religious) can't seem to stop themselves from trying to tell me how to live my life. Which is, of course, why I hate them.
post about what?Ummmmmm. Because you never post about it?????yea, i know. i'm just calling him on it. pretty sick and tired of people who seem to think if you support someone, you agree with them 100%.you act as if any 1 issue is enough to not support someone.I think you should get a freakin brain. There is no infanticide. You are either lying or stupid.Actually, I think Conservative Christians should all embrace the party that sanctions infanticide, and gay marriage, promotes sloth, envy, sexual promiscuity, reproductive irresponsibility, and greed, abhors traditional marriage and sexuality, and is openly antagonistic to traditional religious institutions, demanding that they accept their perverted world view or lose their tax-exempt status.
Don't you?
Gay people are God/s children, why do you want to discriminate against them?
Sexual Promiscuity? A Trump supporter obviously has not problem with that one.
Seems to me, taking away access to birth control & then crying about sexual responsibility is really hypocritical.
Which party backs corporate greed???? Which party demands workers get $7/hr while CEO's get billions?
We have a separation of church & state. If a Church starts a businsss then it follows the same rules. Quit using religion to sanctify bigotry & hate. anmd if your church ewasnts to be political, then rthey can paty fucking tazxers.
.
You are a hate spewing bigoted POS and certainly no Christian
it's entirely possible to disagree with someone AND still support them. why do you have to apply binary thinking to every situation?
Because it suits his worldview, in particular it supports his desire to marginalize anyone who thinks differently than he does.
no one - NO ONE - does that. yet here he is thinking he's being clever, not just stupid.
Here's your chance. Tells us what you don't like about Trump.
Again with the personal insults. The main issue is following laws that apply to everyone regardless of religion, gender, or anything else, a concept that plays a large part in keeping our society from descending into chaos.
You seek to transfer the burdens of discrimination away from the person who chooses to discriminate and onto his or her victims, to drive around and waste their time and energy all because they have been the victims of discrimination and false advertising. This is just plain wrong. People like phillips have to own their actions..
The main issue is government force should be used only when there is a compelling reason, and in cases where people have constitutional rights, only when there is an overriding compelling reason, and even then the government is mandated to use the least intrusive method to fix the situation.
Ruining someone over not baking a cake is not a compelling reason, nor is it using the least intrusive method to remedy the situation.
having to spend a hour or so finding and going to another baker is not the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines or mandates to follow the ruling or go out of business. The only reason you feel this is "justice" is your hatred of people who disagree with you.You are pro-abort so when you meet Jesus, what will you tell him?They are embracing the Party of racism and misogyny, which promotes anti-family policies, and the transfer of wealth to the 1% at the expense of the poor and the middle class. A party which increases poverty, and which promotes policies making it impossible for workers to care for their family without government support. I'm sure that Jesus, who said it is more difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, who said that the love of money was the root of all evil, and who said that poor shall inherit the earth, would vote for the party of hate, repression and greed - NOT!
I'm not "pro-abortion", I'm "pro-choice".
Since God the Father, gave all of us "free will" to make our own choices, I would assume that Jesus would be good with giving other's the right to make their own choices based on their beliefs, as God intended.
Since God the Father created women and gave them the choice to have a baby or end the pregnancy, I'm assuming God knew what he was doing.
The choice of continuing a pregnancy or ending it came from GOD. Not man.
Free will also allows us to murder our fellow man. Your theological basis here is pretty shaky.
As a hasty rationalization, whatever allows you to sleep at night.
It's hardly a "hasty rationalization".
If every sperm were as "sacred" as right wingers would have us believe, why do 1/3 of all pregnancies end in a "spontaneous abortion"? When he created women to give birth, he gave us the option of continuing the pregnancy or ending it. This wasn't an accident. God understood that having a baby was a very big deal, and not to be taken lightly.
In times of famine, of war, during difficult journey, these are not times to be pregnant. God gave us an out.
The real reason Republicans are so opposed to abortion because nothing speaks to failure of Republican economic policies like the rate of abortion among poor women. Nothing exposes hypocrisy of the party of "Family Values" like the inability of poor families to bear and care for their children. So instead they lie and blame the abortion rate on a lack of morality among women.
Republicans are to blame for abortion. No mandated maternity leave - Republicans oppose it. No universal health care - Republicans oppose it. No mandated vacation time - Republicans oppose it. No national child care policy - Republicans oppose it. No increase in the minimum wage - Republicans oppose it. No overtime pay for minimum wage workers - Republicans and Donald Trump opposed it.
Every policy which would help poor families bear and raise their children, and which would reduce abortion, is opposed by Republicans. Every.Single.One.
He also gave us axes to either cut wood or slice open a person's head. Free will leads to intent. The whole "god gave us" line is quite frankly crap.
And you make the mistake of equating government handouts as the only way to help people. Sorry, but the lack of a nanny state isn't an excuse to get rid of a kid you don't want.
More attempts at rationalization, and flimsy ones at that.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.A church is not a business knucklehead
A person can hate any group he wants. But once he opens a business, that BUSINESS must comply with local laws
Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
Actually, the prohibition on homosexual acts, if one is Christian or Jewish and adheres to these writings, is surrounded by other prohibitions of other behaviors, and mandates for other behaviors, which are no longer followed. I would expect a Christian who is fundamentalist to adhere to everything in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Line by line. Do you do this? Have you ever actually read these books?
I have read them plenty of times. Again, you don't get to decide, and more importantly government doesn't get to decide HOW a religion follows it's precepts.
where was it ever said that an employer must pay a livable wage? they will pay what the job is worth. you can take it under those circumstances or do not. but stop all this crap of every job must be "a livable" wage.The main issue is government force should be used only when there is a compelling reason, and in cases where people have constitutional rights, only when there is an overriding compelling reason, and even then the government is mandated to use the least intrusive method to fix the situation.
Ruining someone over not baking a cake is not a compelling reason, nor is it using the least intrusive method to remedy the situation.
having to spend a hour or so finding and going to another baker is not the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines or mandates to follow the ruling or go out of business. The only reason you feel this is "justice" is your hatred of people who disagree with you.You are pro-abort so when you meet Jesus, what will you tell him?
I'm not "pro-abortion", I'm "pro-choice".
Since God the Father, gave all of us "free will" to make our own choices, I would assume that Jesus would be good with giving other's the right to make their own choices based on their beliefs, as God intended.
Since God the Father created women and gave them the choice to have a baby or end the pregnancy, I'm assuming God knew what he was doing.
The choice of continuing a pregnancy or ending it came from GOD. Not man.
Free will also allows us to murder our fellow man. Your theological basis here is pretty shaky.
As a hasty rationalization, whatever allows you to sleep at night.
It's hardly a "hasty rationalization".
If every sperm were as "sacred" as right wingers would have us believe, why do 1/3 of all pregnancies end in a "spontaneous abortion"? When he created women to give birth, he gave us the option of continuing the pregnancy or ending it. This wasn't an accident. God understood that having a baby was a very big deal, and not to be taken lightly.
In times of famine, of war, during difficult journey, these are not times to be pregnant. God gave us an out.
The real reason Republicans are so opposed to abortion because nothing speaks to failure of Republican economic policies like the rate of abortion among poor women. Nothing exposes hypocrisy of the party of "Family Values" like the inability of poor families to bear and care for their children. So instead they lie and blame the abortion rate on a lack of morality among women.
Republicans are to blame for abortion. No mandated maternity leave - Republicans oppose it. No universal health care - Republicans oppose it. No mandated vacation time - Republicans oppose it. No national child care policy - Republicans oppose it. No increase in the minimum wage - Republicans oppose it. No overtime pay for minimum wage workers - Republicans and Donald Trump opposed it.
Every policy which would help poor families bear and raise their children, and which would reduce abortion, is opposed by Republicans. Every.Single.One.
He also gave us axes to either cut wood or slice open a person's head. Free will leads to intent. The whole "god gave us" line is quite frankly crap.
And you make the mistake of equating government handouts as the only way to help people. Sorry, but the lack of a nanny state isn't an excuse to get rid of a kid you don't want.
More attempts at rationalization, and flimsy ones at that.
God didn't create those things. Man did.
You equate programs which actually help families to "handouts", but don't equate government income supports to poor working people as the "corporate wage subsidies" which enable the wealthy not to pay their workers a living wage. How totally hypocritical of you.
Earned income credits are "free shit" in the hands of the workers, but you deny that this is in fact a transfer of wealth from the working and middle class to the wealthy.
There is no one so gullible as a Republican voter.
They may not approve of his life, but unlike the democrats, he will not go after what is important in THEIR lives. Democrats offer nothing to Evangelicals except more attacks on their beliefs and lives.
Voting for a thrice-married, twice divorced man known for extramarital affairs, cavorting with Playboy models, vulgar talk, and an itchy Twitter trigger finger — to say nothing of the accusations of racism and sexual harassment or worse against Trump — certainly opens socially conservative Christians up to charges of hypocrisy. It also arguably makes it harder to reach other Americans, including young people, with their religious missions, or work with fellow Christians in communities of color.
But these consequences pale in comparison to voting for a party that stands opposed to the issues nearest to conservative Christians' hearts. As conservative Christian commentator Erick Erickson put it, the Democratic Party "offers me no home and is deeply hostile to people of faith. The president has shown himself to not share my faith convictions any more than the other side, but the president has shown he is willing to defend my faith convictions and is supportive of them."
Erickson didn't vote for Trump in 2016, but announced earlier this month that he plans to do so in 2020. Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee was one of the most steadfast "Never Trump" social conservatives. He too has said he will endorse Trump in 2020.
Religious conservatives will never abandon Trump
So not even religious beliefs are enough to get people to look past the duopoly?
The main issue is government force should be used only when there is a compelling reason, and in cases where people have constitutional rights, only when there is an overriding compelling reason, and even then the government is mandated to use the least intrusive method to fix the situation.
Ruining someone over not baking a cake is not a compelling reason, nor is it using the least intrusive method to remedy the situation.
having to spend a hour or so finding and going to another baker is not the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines or mandates to follow the ruling or go out of business. The only reason you feel this is "justice" is your hatred of people who disagree with you.You are pro-abort so when you meet Jesus, what will you tell him?
I'm not "pro-abortion", I'm "pro-choice".
Since God the Father, gave all of us "free will" to make our own choices, I would assume that Jesus would be good with giving other's the right to make their own choices based on their beliefs, as God intended.
Since God the Father created women and gave them the choice to have a baby or end the pregnancy, I'm assuming God knew what he was doing.
The choice of continuing a pregnancy or ending it came from GOD. Not man.
Free will also allows us to murder our fellow man. Your theological basis here is pretty shaky.
As a hasty rationalization, whatever allows you to sleep at night.
It's hardly a "hasty rationalization".
If every sperm were as "sacred" as right wingers would have us believe, why do 1/3 of all pregnancies end in a "spontaneous abortion"? When he created women to give birth, he gave us the option of continuing the pregnancy or ending it. This wasn't an accident. God understood that having a baby was a very big deal, and not to be taken lightly.
In times of famine, of war, during difficult journey, these are not times to be pregnant. God gave us an out.
The real reason Republicans are so opposed to abortion because nothing speaks to failure of Republican economic policies like the rate of abortion among poor women. Nothing exposes hypocrisy of the party of "Family Values" like the inability of poor families to bear and care for their children. So instead they lie and blame the abortion rate on a lack of morality among women.
Republicans are to blame for abortion. No mandated maternity leave - Republicans oppose it. No universal health care - Republicans oppose it. No mandated vacation time - Republicans oppose it. No national child care policy - Republicans oppose it. No increase in the minimum wage - Republicans oppose it. No overtime pay for minimum wage workers - Republicans and Donald Trump opposed it.
Every policy which would help poor families bear and raise their children, and which would reduce abortion, is opposed by Republicans. Every.Single.One.
He also gave us axes to either cut wood or slice open a person's head. Free will leads to intent. The whole "god gave us" line is quite frankly crap.
And you make the mistake of equating government handouts as the only way to help people. Sorry, but the lack of a nanny state isn't an excuse to get rid of a kid you don't want.
More attempts at rationalization, and flimsy ones at that.
God didn't create those things. Man did.
You equate programs which actually help families to "handouts", but don't equate government income supports to poor working people as the "corporate wage subsidies" which enable the wealthy not to pay their workers a living wage. How totally hypocritical of you.
Earned income credits are "free shit" in the hands of the workers, but you deny that this is in fact a transfer of wealth from the working and middle class to the wealthy.
There is no one so gullible as a Republican voter.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
Actually, the prohibition on homosexual acts, if one is Christian or Jewish and adheres to these writings, is surrounded by other prohibitions of other behaviors, and mandates for other behaviors, which are no longer followed. I would expect a Christian who is fundamentalist to adhere to everything in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Line by line. Do you do this? Have you ever actually read these books?
I have read them plenty of times. Again, you don't get to decide, and more importantly government doesn't get to decide HOW a religion follows it's precepts.
So you admit that you are a cherrypicker who abuses your scripture to fit your taste. You also applaud government intervention and interference with the religious and moral choices made by women, showing that you are a Big Government guy.
Have fun with your ritual baths, your animal sacrifices, and having sex with your dead childless brother's wife, and not driving or switching the lights on on the Sabbath.
Your religion is a farce.
They may not approve of his life, but unlike the democrats, he will not go after what is important in THEIR lives. Democrats offer nothing to Evangelicals except more attacks on their beliefs and lives.
Voting for a thrice-married, twice divorced man known for extramarital affairs, cavorting with Playboy models, vulgar talk, and an itchy Twitter trigger finger — to say nothing of the accusations of racism and sexual harassment or worse against Trump — certainly opens socially conservative Christians up to charges of hypocrisy. It also arguably makes it harder to reach other Americans, including young people, with their religious missions, or work with fellow Christians in communities of color.
But these consequences pale in comparison to voting for a party that stands opposed to the issues nearest to conservative Christians' hearts. As conservative Christian commentator Erick Erickson put it, the Democratic Party "offers me no home and is deeply hostile to people of faith. The president has shown himself to not share my faith convictions any more than the other side, but the president has shown he is willing to defend my faith convictions and is supportive of them."
Erickson didn't vote for Trump in 2016, but announced earlier this month that he plans to do so in 2020. Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee was one of the most steadfast "Never Trump" social conservatives. He too has said he will endorse Trump in 2020.
Religious conservatives will never abandon Trump
Sums up perfectly why I left organized religion years ago. The one thing that supposedly cannot be compromised is religious principles yet here they are, believing in a figure who doesn’t embody any of their beliefs.
But to your point, like the GOP now…they won’t abandon Mara-Lard-Ass, they have nowhere else to go.
What do the Dems offer them besides persecution?
Sorry, the party of "Bake that cake, peasant" isn't going to win over these people.
No, I don’t expect it would. I wouldn’t expect them as a group to endorse the Democrats.
However if your loyalty is to God (make me laugh harder), your loyalty is to her/him (or just “him” in their case). You don’t compromise that and give your loyalty to someone who doesn’t share your values.
As for the Politics of the situation, lets say Joe Biden is the nominee. You’re stating—correctly—that the Christian Conservatives will support someone who has had multiple affairs over Biden who TTBOOK, never had any.
Biden supports policies harmful to their interests.
You are confusing supporting someone politically with endorsing their behavior.
Trump may violate the rules they live by, but to them his soul is his issue,and thus they know God will judge him as he sees fit.
But what he doesn't do it try to ruin them for their belief structure.
They may not approve of his life, but unlike the democrats, he will not go after what is important in THEIR lives. Democrats offer nothing to Evangelicals except more attacks on their beliefs and lives.
Religious conservatives will never abandon Trump
Sums up perfectly why I left organized religion years ago. The one thing that supposedly cannot be compromised is religious principles yet here they are, believing in a figure who doesn’t embody any of their beliefs.
But to your point, like the GOP now…they won’t abandon Mara-Lard-Ass, they have nowhere else to go.
What do the Dems offer them besides persecution?
Sorry, the party of "Bake that cake, peasant" isn't going to win over these people.
No, I don’t expect it would. I wouldn’t expect them as a group to endorse the Democrats.
However if your loyalty is to God (make me laugh harder), your loyalty is to her/him (or just “him” in their case). You don’t compromise that and give your loyalty to someone who doesn’t share your values.
As for the Politics of the situation, lets say Joe Biden is the nominee. You’re stating—correctly—that the Christian Conservatives will support someone who has had multiple affairs over Biden who TTBOOK, never had any.
Biden supports policies harmful to their interests.
You are confusing supporting someone politically with endorsing their behavior.
Trump may violate the rules they live by, but to them his soul is his issue,and thus they know God will judge him as he sees fit.
But what he doesn't do it try to ruin them for their belief structure.
Biden doesn't support policies that are "harmful to their interests". Gay rights, women's reproductive rights, and the right of all people to have unfettered access to health care, have absolutely no impact on the rights of conservative Christians.
If providing services to people whose beliefs you disagree with is so odious to the Christian right that they cannot serve them, then they are free to avoid opening businesses which are open to the "public". In the event they do open their business to the public, then public accommodation laws should be respected as set out in the Bible.
Sums up perfectly why I left organized religion years ago. The one thing that supposedly cannot be compromised is religious principles yet here they are, believing in a figure who doesn’t embody any of their beliefs.
But to your point, like the GOP now…they won’t abandon Mara-Lard-Ass, they have nowhere else to go.
What do the Dems offer them besides persecution?
Sorry, the party of "Bake that cake, peasant" isn't going to win over these people.
No, I don’t expect it would. I wouldn’t expect them as a group to endorse the Democrats.
However if your loyalty is to God (make me laugh harder), your loyalty is to her/him (or just “him” in their case). You don’t compromise that and give your loyalty to someone who doesn’t share your values.
As for the Politics of the situation, lets say Joe Biden is the nominee. You’re stating—correctly—that the Christian Conservatives will support someone who has had multiple affairs over Biden who TTBOOK, never had any.
Biden supports policies harmful to their interests.
You are confusing supporting someone politically with endorsing their behavior.
Trump may violate the rules they live by, but to them his soul is his issue,and thus they know God will judge him as he sees fit.
But what he doesn't do it try to ruin them for their belief structure.
Biden doesn't support policies that are "harmful to their interests". Gay rights, women's reproductive rights, and the right of all people to have unfettered access to health care, have absolutely no impact on the rights of conservative Christians.
If providing services to people whose beliefs you disagree with is so odious to the Christian right that they cannot serve them, then they are free to avoid opening businesses which are open to the "public". In the event they do open their business to the public, then public accommodation laws should be respected as set out in the Bible.
"Bake that fucking cake, peasant"
What do the Dems offer them besides persecution?
Sorry, the party of "Bake that cake, peasant" isn't going to win over these people.
No, I don’t expect it would. I wouldn’t expect them as a group to endorse the Democrats.
However if your loyalty is to God (make me laugh harder), your loyalty is to her/him (or just “him” in their case). You don’t compromise that and give your loyalty to someone who doesn’t share your values.
As for the Politics of the situation, lets say Joe Biden is the nominee. You’re stating—correctly—that the Christian Conservatives will support someone who has had multiple affairs over Biden who TTBOOK, never had any.
Biden supports policies harmful to their interests.
You are confusing supporting someone politically with endorsing their behavior.
Trump may violate the rules they live by, but to them his soul is his issue,and thus they know God will judge him as he sees fit.
But what he doesn't do it try to ruin them for their belief structure.
Biden doesn't support policies that are "harmful to their interests". Gay rights, women's reproductive rights, and the right of all people to have unfettered access to health care, have absolutely no impact on the rights of conservative Christians.
If providing services to people whose beliefs you disagree with is so odious to the Christian right that they cannot serve them, then they are free to avoid opening businesses which are open to the "public". In the event they do open their business to the public, then public accommodation laws should be respected as set out in the Bible.
"Bake that fucking cake, peasant"
By every Christian principle, by every law that Jesus gave his followers, by every commandment about obeying the laws of the land, and doing unto others as you would have have them do unto you, and by every scripture in the Bible about welcoming others, yes, bake the fucking cake.
When we tore down your "Whites Only" signs you racist bigoted assfuck.A church is not a business knucklehead
A person can hate any group he wants. But once he opens a business, that BUSINESS must comply with local laws
Why does a person automatically lose their constitutional rights when they try to sell something?
Why is free exercise limited only to Churches (in your opinion).
The religious basis for segregation was flawed and really just a justification for something that was done for economic reasons.
The religious prohibition on homosexual acts is far more explicit in all of the major religious texts.
Where outside of the Old Testament. What did Jesus say about homosexuality?
What difference does that make?
So says the person wanting to ban gay marriage. Wanting to legalize discrimination.No, I don’t expect it would. I wouldn’t expect them as a group to endorse the Democrats.
However if your loyalty is to God (make me laugh harder), your loyalty is to her/him (or just “him” in their case). You don’t compromise that and give your loyalty to someone who doesn’t share your values.
As for the Politics of the situation, lets say Joe Biden is the nominee. You’re stating—correctly—that the Christian Conservatives will support someone who has had multiple affairs over Biden who TTBOOK, never had any.
Biden supports policies harmful to their interests.
You are confusing supporting someone politically with endorsing their behavior.
Trump may violate the rules they live by, but to them his soul is his issue,and thus they know God will judge him as he sees fit.
But what he doesn't do it try to ruin them for their belief structure.
Biden doesn't support policies that are "harmful to their interests". Gay rights, women's reproductive rights, and the right of all people to have unfettered access to health care, have absolutely no impact on the rights of conservative Christians.
If providing services to people whose beliefs you disagree with is so odious to the Christian right that they cannot serve them, then they are free to avoid opening businesses which are open to the "public". In the event they do open their business to the public, then public accommodation laws should be respected as set out in the Bible.
"Bake that fucking cake, peasant"
By every Christian principle, by every law that Jesus gave his followers, by every commandment about obeying the laws of the land, and doing unto others as you would have have them do unto you, and by every scripture in the Bible about welcoming others, yes, bake the fucking cake.
"Render unto caesar" doesn't mean blanket acceptance of all laws, and there is a difference between being ASKED to comply with something, and being FORCED to comply.
Sorry, but the days of your political opposition rolling over to fascist wanna-be's like you is OVER.
But government dick suckers like you just LOOOOVE government force, because you are too gutless to do things like this yourself.
