Religious pic removed from public school, justice prevails

[daws101]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

do you really? what evidence is there?

DO I REALLY WHAT?

 

[ogibillm]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

do you really? what evidence is there?

DO I REALLY WHAT?

believe frank is smarter than that.

 

[daws101]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

do you really? what evidence is there?

DO I REALLY WHAT?

believe frank is smarter than that.

gotta give him the benefit of the doubt.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

Atheism is the Official Religious Belief of Progressives and the only one they'll support and inflict on us

 

[IsaacNewton]

Honestly, kristians whine and bitch about every little thing regarding their religion. Just to cram it back down their throat a huge Islamic, Hindu, Jewish and/or other religious symbol, flag, idol should be put up right across from every church in the country.

And then let the real whining begin.

Because 'kristians' know, if Jaysus' picture isn't hanging in a school the entire religion will collapse.

 

[daws101]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

Atheism is the Official Religious Belief of Progressives and the only one they'll support and inflict on us

nope !
as to religion being inflicted on people the crusades come to mind , all the cultures destroyed by Christianity
so called Christians would be advised not to go around shouting this has been inflicted on us!

 

[peach174]

The bottom line remains, a picture is not compulsion, any more than a picture of Einstein makes kids smart.

Einstein is not the primary symbol of a religion.

And a picture of him doesn't make kids smart. Likewise, the smart people understand that a picture of Jesus won't force the kids to become Christians.

It is a violation of the 1st Amendment establishment clause to have that picture on display in a government building.

Too bad you aren't smart enough to figure that out for yourself.

Then all of the displays of Moses & Solomon including the 10 commandments needs to be torn down from the Supreme Court and the House and Senate Chaplain needs to go.
Never mind we have had one ever since we became a Nation in 1776.

SCOTUS display is about the law and incorporates 18 different influential sources for the law ergo it is not endorsing religion.

http://mentalfloss.com/article/17802/how-mohammad-statue-ended-supreme-court

Sculpture figures prominently in the Corinthian architecture of the Court Building. One chamber features a frieze decorated with a bas-relief sculpture by Adolph A. Weinman of eighteen influential law-givers. The south wall depicts Menes, Hammurabi, Moses, Solomon, Lycurgus, Solon, Draco, Confucius and Octavian, while the north wall depicts Napoleon Bonaparte, John Marshall, William Blackstone, Hugo Grotius, Louis IX, King John, Charlemagne, Justinian and, you guessed it, Mohammad.​

The House and Senate chaplains are supposed to be non denominational and yes, they should go since they have never had a wiccan, Hindi, shintoist, etc priest give the blessings.

Tradition is not an excuse for violations of the 1st Amendment and it is most certainly not an excuse to expand those violations.

Who would know better than all of the Founders about that?
It was not a Tradition.
The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.
The Government can not endorse any certain type of different religions.
It was so important to them that they made that the very 1st sentence in the 1st Amendment.

 

[daws101]

Einstein is not the primary symbol of a religion.

And a picture of him doesn't make kids smart. Likewise, the smart people understand that a picture of Jesus won't force the kids to become Christians.

It is a violation of the 1st Amendment establishment clause to have that picture on display in a government building.

Too bad you aren't smart enough to figure that out for yourself.

Then all of the displays of Moses & Solomon including the 10 commandments needs to be torn down from the Supreme Court and the House and Senate Chaplain needs to go.
Never mind we have had one ever since we became a Nation in 1776.

SCOTUS display is about the law and incorporates 18 different influential sources for the law ergo it is not endorsing religion.

How a Mohammad Statue Ended up at the Supreme Court

Sculpture figures prominently in the Corinthian architecture of the Court Building. One chamber features a frieze decorated with a bas-relief sculpture by Adolph A. Weinman of eighteen influential law-givers. The south wall depicts Menes, Hammurabi, Moses, Solomon, Lycurgus, Solon, Draco, Confucius and Octavian, while the north wall depicts Napoleon Bonaparte, John Marshall, William Blackstone, Hugo Grotius, Louis IX, King John, Charlemagne, Justinian and, you guessed it, Mohammad.​

The House and Senate chaplains are supposed to be non denominational and yes, they should go since they have never had a wiccan, Hindi, shintoist, etc priest give the blessings.

Tradition is not an excuse for violations of the 1st Amendment and it is most certainly not an excuse to expand those violations.

Who would know better than all of the Founders about that?
It was not a Tradition.
The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.
The Government can not endorse any certain type of different religions.
It was so important to them that they made that the very 1st sentence in the 1st Amendment.

See folks that's how you misinterpret!

 

[peach174]

Progs continue their Jihad on religion on their way to making atheism the one and only state accepted religious belief

false atheism is the absence of belief ...by definition it can't be a religion.
com'on frank I know you are smarter than that!

Atheism is the Official Religious Belief of Progressives and the only one they'll support and inflict on us

nope !
as to religion being inflicted on people the crusades come to mind , all the cultures destroyed by Christianity
so called Christians would be advised not to go around shouting this has been inflicted on us!

That is not true and so distorted.
I suppose that you would still like the head hunter cultures?
You are one of the many whom the Bible talks about in end times.
Now the Spirit (of God) speaks clearly, that in the last days some shall depart from the faith (of that which is taught in the Bible), giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils…” [1 Timothy 4:1]

 

[peach174]

And a picture of him doesn't make kids smart. Likewise, the smart people understand that a picture of Jesus won't force the kids to become Christians.

It is a violation of the 1st Amendment establishment clause to have that picture on display in a government building.

Too bad you aren't smart enough to figure that out for yourself.

Then all of the displays of Moses & Solomon including the 10 commandments needs to be torn down from the Supreme Court and the House and Senate Chaplain needs to go.
Never mind we have had one ever since we became a Nation in 1776.

SCOTUS display is about the law and incorporates 18 different influential sources for the law ergo it is not endorsing religion.

How a Mohammad Statue Ended up at the Supreme Court

Sculpture figures prominently in the Corinthian architecture of the Court Building. One chamber features a frieze decorated with a bas-relief sculpture by Adolph A. Weinman of eighteen influential law-givers. The south wall depicts Menes, Hammurabi, Moses, Solomon, Lycurgus, Solon, Draco, Confucius and Octavian, while the north wall depicts Napoleon Bonaparte, John Marshall, William Blackstone, Hugo Grotius, Louis IX, King John, Charlemagne, Justinian and, you guessed it, Mohammad.​

The House and Senate chaplains are supposed to be non denominational and yes, they should go since they have never had a wiccan, Hindi, shintoist, etc priest give the blessings.

Tradition is not an excuse for violations of the 1st Amendment and it is most certainly not an excuse to expand those violations.

Who would know better than all of the Founders about that?
It was not a Tradition.
The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.
The Government can not endorse any certain type of different religions.
It was so important to them that they made that the very 1st sentence in the 1st Amendment.

See folks that's how you misinterpret!

No that is what you are doing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Honestly, kristians whine and bitch about every little thing regarding their religion. Just to cram it back down their throat a huge Islamic, Hindu, Jewish and/or other religious symbol, flag, idol should be put up right across from every church in the country.

And then let the real whining begin.

Because 'kristians' know, if Jaysus' picture isn't hanging in a school the entire religion will collapse.

You speak fluent moron

 

[Derideo_Te]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

 

[peach174]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

You are the one who has not studied our American History.
Never has this been an issue nor so misinterpreted and distorted and attacked until the Socialists and Atheists of the 1960's.
The 1st amendment does not say freedom FROM Religion.

 

[peach174]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

I recommend that you take a look at the Hillsdale College videos.
I know you won't because you don't want to really learn the correct History. You are already too closed minded.
By the way I learned from actual American History books before the Liberal Professor's of the 60's and 70's who are teaching and distorting our American History.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

You are the one who has not studied our American History.
Never has this been an issue nor so misinterpreted and distorted and attacked until the Socialists and Atheists of the 1960's.
The 1st amendment does not say freedom FROM Religion.

Onus is on you to prove that you can have freedom OF religion WITHOUT freedom FROM religion.

The 1st Amendment is explicit about excluding all religion from government.

That includes hanging a religious picture in a government school building.

That is freedom FROM religion.

Now provide a credible source that refutes the Law of the Land.

 

[ogibillm]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

I recommend that you take a look at the Hillsdale College videos.

that explains so much.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

You are the one who has not studied our American History.
Never has this been an issue nor so misinterpreted and distorted and attacked until the Socialists and Atheists of the 1960's.
The 1st amendment does not say freedom FROM Religion.

Onus is on you to prove that you can have freedom OF religion WITHOUT freedom FROM religion.

The 1st Amendment is explicit about excluding all religion from government.

That includes hanging a religious picture in a government school building.

That is freedom FROM religion.

Now provide a credible source that refutes the Law of the Land.

No the first amendment isn't explicit at all. In fact, it says the exact opposite

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a national organization dedicated to the principle of separation of church and state.

Ryan Jayne, a spokesman for the foundation’s legal department, said he thinks it’s “wonderful” that the district responded the way it did and as quickly as it did.

Read more here: Chanute residents protest removal of picture of Jesus from school

pic should have never been displayed in the first place.

Did you righteous Progressive burn the miscreants who dared engage in speech opposed by the party at the stake?

You must have at least lynched them?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Church and state are separate.

But Mosque and State are one.

Obama Akbar.

 

[peach174]

The 1st amendment gives all of our Federal workers the freedom to worship God if they want to, not to get God out the Government.

I recommend that you enroll in remedial adult social studies at your local community college because you obviously don't have a clue what the 1st Amendment actually means.

But thanks for disqualifying yourself from any further meaningful participation on this topic.

Have a nice day.

I recommend that you take a look at the Hillsdale College videos.

that explains so much.

use the rest of what I said
By the way I learned from actual American History books before the Liberal Professor's of the 60's and 70's who are teaching and distorting our American History.