Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump was imploring his supporters to vote in person. Plus his supporters took a more cavalier approach to covid. That led to most Trump voters, voting in person.
On the flip side, Biden was imploring his supporters to vote by mail. Plus, his supporters were generally more cautious about covid. That led to most Biden voters, voting by mail.
On top of that, factor in Demoractic strongholds produce a majority of votes for the Democratic candidate. Given all that, it's not absurd that Biden got 90+% of mail-in votes in some of those areas.
HilariousFact: On Jan 20th 2021, Trump stepped aside and Biden took the office of the presidency with no issues.
Correct?
Sure it is.
If someone was opposing the peaceful transfer of power, they wouldn’t peacefully stand down and allow the power to transfer, as Trump did. So what you claim didn’t happen, and doesn’t make sense
Just because your MSDNC fictional narratives get busted by this doesn’t mean you have to throw temper tantrums about it and whine.
In Michigan, in 2020, there were 5.5 million votes cast. Party breakdown in Michigan is 34% Repub, 47% dem.
That’s roughly:
Dem 2.6 million
Repub 1.8 millon
3.3 million people voted absentee in 2020. So to say that 90% of the absentee vote went for Biden, would mean that almost 100% of democrats would have had to have voted by mail.
Even if all 100% of the dems did vote by mail, there still would have had to have been more Trump votes in there.
Does that sound legitimate? I wouldn’t think so.
LOLFalse. Peaceful transfer of power begins in December when the outgoing president invites the incoming president to join in briefings and other meetings to get them prepared inauguration day. It's not just about the outgoing president's last day in office.
LOL
peaceful = no violence.
Biden assumed office on January 20th 2021 without any issues. It was a peaceful transfer of power. If Trump was such a dictator, he wouldn’t have let that happen. But he did. So, you’re wrong.
there was no problems. Joe was sworn in without incident.LOLOL
"Without any issues"
Cons are fucking nuts, I tell ya.
There were no issues that one day because the Capitol was sealed off to the public, with fences and barbed wire, due to the crazed MAGA nuts...
there was no problems. Joe was sworn in without incident.
No hyperbole or narratives from you changes that. Keep crying and throwing your tantrum.
Nothing happened. Thus, your narrative is busted."Without incident," because MAGA had to be kept at bay from the Capitol with barbed wire.
That is NOT "without issue."
Nothing happened. Thus, your narrative is busted.
In order for the analogies to match up, you’d have to prove not only was there a mob outside of the building on January 20th, but that Trump ordered it.That is not "without issue."
That's like saying it's not an issue a guy hid in the bushes for 12 hours to shoot Trump because secret service stopped him before he took a shot.
In order for the analogies to match up, you’d have to prove not only was there a mob outside of the building on January 20th, but that Trump ordered it.
Neither of those are true, so your analogy is incorrect
Finding an armed shooter in the bushes is an objective identifiable threat, so you’d need a mob outside of the building while Biden was being sworn in to match to keep the analogy.I didn't say there was a mob. I said there wasn't because the military was present and erected fencing with barbed wire to keep them out. There was no mob because there was no way of them getting in.
Just the fact the military had to do that means there was an issue.
Will the Marxists once again try the 2am push out of Republican Poll Watchers and then start pulling ballots for Camel Toe and running them through over and over? Not if the army of Trump Lawyers are there. And also keep an eye out for the ballot stuffers of mail boxes. Democrats will "Lie, Steal and Cheat" to win elections. Arent you proud of your party?
Finding an armed shooter in the bushes is an objective identifiable threat, so you’d need a mob outside of the building while Biden was being sworn in to match to keep the analogy.
And, you’d have to have Trumpmleading the charge.
Your analogy is off by a mile, and now you’re trying to shift the goalposts that some barbed wire was put up means that an outside force tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
Nobody tried to stop the transfer of power and when the power transfer occurred. Thus, you’re just wrong and desperate
Prove the threat.Again, the peaceful transfer of power started before inauguration day. Peaceful transfer of power is one administration transferring power to the incoming administration. That doesn't just mean walking out of the White House by the time the new president is being sworn in. It starts weeks before than to prepare the incoming president.
And if there were no issues on inauguration day, as you laughably assert, there would have been no need to erect a fence with barbed wire around the Capitol and secured with a strong military presence.
Which would be a lie.So to say that 90% of the absentee vote went for Biden
It wasn't 90+% for Biden out of millions of ballots from around the entire state. It was a one or two cities.
