Republicans Altered Benghazi Emails, CBS News Report Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
it is not official at all

they did not alter any emails

but i'm sure the liberal strategy is to flood the board with dozens of threads on this in the hopes of repeating a lie enough times will cause some sucker to believe it
 
Darrell Issa says a LOT of stuff that isn't true.

Interesting that you would counter this news story that has not/can not be refuted with something "Darrell Issa said". :lol:


Actually, it is true.


Your OP is an attempt to obfuscate, to cloud the issue.



Folks who have identified Obama scandals, and have suggested that Obama is Nixon-like include arch liberals Joe Klein, former New York Times general counsel James Goodale, constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald, Jonathan Turley – perhaps the top constitutional law expert in the United States,...
Top Constitutional Experts: Obama Is Worse than Nixon | Washington's Blog


....Liberal radio host Bill Press is calling for Obama to fire Eric Holder. Charley Rangel says, “No one believes that the president has given us a sufficient answer [to the IRS and DOJ scandals].”
» Stunner: who is suddenly telling liberal jackals to attack Obama? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


Dana Milbank puts it: “Nixon was a control freak. Obama seems to be the opposite: He wants no control over the actions of his administration. As the president distances himself from the actions of ‘independent’ figures within his administration, he’s creating a power vacuum in which lower officials behave as though anything goes.” That’s not exculpatory: a president is responsible for the abuses of his administration whether he orders them directly or simply creates the conditions in which they can happen.
Obama: Nixon in Reverse | The American Conservative



Your own kith and kin are painting you as the dim-wit you are.

Everything article you posted has a conservative bias.



Oh, good....the moron with the 000 IQ is looking for a way to find all those Liberals in the post are now conservative.....

Dunce.
 
059627851_gop_liars1_answer_3_xlarge.jpeg
 
Actually, it is true.


Your OP is an attempt to obfuscate, to cloud the issue.



Folks who have identified Obama scandals, and have suggested that Obama is Nixon-like include arch liberals Joe Klein, former New York Times general counsel James Goodale, constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald, Jonathan Turley – perhaps the top constitutional law expert in the United States,...
Top Constitutional Experts: Obama Is Worse than Nixon | Washington's Blog


....Liberal radio host Bill Press is calling for Obama to fire Eric Holder. Charley Rangel says, “No one believes that the president has given us a sufficient answer [to the IRS and DOJ scandals].”
» Stunner: who is suddenly telling liberal jackals to attack Obama? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


Dana Milbank puts it: “Nixon was a control freak. Obama seems to be the opposite: He wants no control over the actions of his administration. As the president distances himself from the actions of ‘independent’ figures within his administration, he’s creating a power vacuum in which lower officials behave as though anything goes.” That’s not exculpatory: a president is responsible for the abuses of his administration whether he orders them directly or simply creates the conditions in which they can happen.
Obama: Nixon in Reverse | The American Conservative



Your own kith and kin are painting you as the dim-wit you are.

Everything article you posted has a conservative bias.



Oh, good....the moron with the 000 IQ is looking for a way to find all those Liberals in the post are now conservative.....

Dunce.

I don't see how I am supposed to be swayed by liberals criticizing Obama. You don't give Obama credit for anything which is an indication of your own stupidity and willful ignorance.
 
It's Official: Those Bogus Email Leaks Came From Republicans





It's not as if we didn't know this already, but today Major Garrett made it official: last week's leaks that misquoted the Benghazi emails came directly from Republicans. Here's the report on the CBS Evening News:


On Friday, Republicans leaked what they said was a quote from Rhodes: "We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don't want to undermine the FBI investigation. But it turns out that in the actual email, Rhodes did not mention the State Department.


....Republicans also provided what they said was a quote from an email written by State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland. The Republican version quotes Nuland discussing, "The penultimate point is a paragraph talking about all the previous warnings provided by the Agency (CIA) about al-Qaeda's presence and activities of al-Qaeda." The actual email from Nuland says: "The penultimate point could be abused by members to beat the State Department for not paying attention to Agency warnings."


The CIA agreed with the concerns raised by the State Department and revised the talking points to make them less specific than the CIA's original version, eliminating references to al Qaeda and affiliates and earlier security warnings. There is no evidence that the White House orchestrated the changes.
So here's what happened. Republicans in Congress saw copies of these emails two months ago and did nothing with them. It was obvious that they showed little more than routine interagency haggling. Then, riding high after last week's Benghazi hearings, someone got the bright idea of leaking two isolated tidbits and mischaracterizing them in an effort to make the State Department look bad. Apparently they figured it was a twofer: they could stick a shiv into the belly of the White House and they could then badger them to release the entire email chain, knowing they never would.


But it was typical GOP overreach. To their surprise, the White House took Republicans up on their demand to make the entire email chain public, thus making it clear to the press that they had been burned. And now reporters are letting us all know who was behind it.


This has always been the Republican Party's biggest risk with this stuff: that they don't know when to quit. On Benghazi, when it became obvious that they didn't have a smoking gun, they got desperate and tried to invent one. On the IRS, their problem is that Democrats are as outraged as they are. This will force them to make ever more outrageous accusations in an effort to find some way to draw a contrast. And on the AP phone records, they have to continually dance around the fact that they basically approve of subpoenas like this.


A sane party would take a deep breath and decide to move on to other things. But the tea partiers have the scent of blood now, and it's driving them crazy. Thus the spectacle of Michele Bachmann suggesting today that it's time to start impeachment proceedings.


The GOP's adults can't keep their lunatic fringe on a leash, which means it's only a matter of time until they make fools of themselves on all three of the pseudoscandals that are currently lighting up the airwaves. The Republicans have met the enemy, and it is them.






:clap2::clap2::clap2:




"But House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Sunday the White House has "effectively lied" to the American people in the aftermath of the attack, and pledged further investigation.

"The real truth is the people who were there in Tripoli and Benghazi knew it was a terror attack from the get-go," Issa told "Meet the Press." "When the wheels come off, when in fact people make a decision to give us something that's false and then that's shown to be false, of course we have an obligation to look at it."


Read more: White House: GOP fabricated leaked Benghazi email - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com
Follow us: [MENTION=27326]The[/MENTION]hill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Darrell Issa says a LOT of stuff that isn't true.

Interesting that you would counter this news story that has not/can not be refuted with something "Darrell Issa said". :lol:

Issa is DICK.....
 
fuck

how many threads do we need on this?

Ah...suddenly the RWrs don't want to talk about this stuff? That's a SURE SIGN, isn't it?

please tell me where i said rw's didn't want to talk about it. it is being talked about in about a dozen threads. it is not easy to follow so many threads on one topic.

try be a little more honest next time.
 
Everything article you posted has a conservative bias.



Oh, good....the moron with the 000 IQ is looking for a way to find all those Liberals in the post are now conservative.....

Dunce.

I don't see how I am supposed to be swayed by liberals criticizing Obama. You don't give Obama credit for anything which is an indication of your own stupidity and willful ignorance.



You have a point.

Unfortunately, it's on top of your head.

"I don't see how I am supposed to be swayed by liberals..."

Yeah...you do.
That's why your earlier post attempted to paint them as conservative.


So....let's review:

You're both stupid and dishonest.

Considering your constellation of skills, it's difficult to see how is it possible for you to decide whether to defecate or to wind your watch....
 
"But House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Sunday the White House has "effectively lied" to the American people in the aftermath of the attack, and pledged further investigation.

"The real truth is the people who were there in Tripoli and Benghazi knew it was a terror attack from the get-go," Issa told "Meet the Press." "When the wheels come off, when in fact people make a decision to give us something that's false and then that's shown to be false, of course we have an obligation to look at it."


Read more: White House: GOP fabricated leaked Benghazi email - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com
Follow us: @Thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Darrell Issa says a LOT of stuff that isn't true.

Interesting that you would counter this news story that has not/can not be refuted with something "Darrell Issa said". :lol:


Actually, it is true.


Your OP is an attempt to obfuscate, to cloud the issue.



Folks who have identified Obama scandals, and have suggested that Obama is Nixon-like include arch liberals Joe Klein, former New York Times general counsel James Goodale, constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald, Jonathan Turley – perhaps the top constitutional law expert in the United States,...
Top Constitutional Experts: Obama Is Worse than Nixon | Washington's Blog


....Liberal radio host Bill Press is calling for Obama to fire Eric Holder. Charley Rangel says, “No one believes that the president has given us a sufficient answer [to the IRS and DOJ scandals].”
» Stunner: who is suddenly telling liberal jackals to attack Obama? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


Dana Milbank puts it: “Nixon was a control freak. Obama seems to be the opposite: He wants no control over the actions of his administration. As the president distances himself from the actions of ‘independent’ figures within his administration, he’s creating a power vacuum in which lower officials behave as though anything goes.” That’s not exculpatory: a president is responsible for the abuses of his administration whether he orders them directly or simply creates the conditions in which they can happen.
Obama: Nixon in Reverse | The American Conservative



Your own kith and kin are painting you as the dim-wit you are.


OOOH! Beltway pundits said it, so it must be true! :lol:

Refute the OP. You can't. Hack.
 
Everything article you posted has a conservative bias.



Oh, good....the moron with the 000 IQ is looking for a way to find all those Liberals in the post are now conservative.....

Dunce.

I don't see how I am supposed to be swayed by liberals criticizing Obama. You don't give Obama credit for anything which is an indication of your own stupidity and willful ignorance.

What are we supposed to be giving him credit for? I'm not just gonna give someone credit. They have to earn it.
 
it is not official at all

they did not alter any emails

but i'm sure the liberal strategy is to flood the board with dozens of threads on this in the hopes of repeating a lie enough times will cause some sucker to believe it
Hey, dumbass - who said altered? It says 'leaked'.
 
"But House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Sunday the White House has "effectively lied" to the American people in the aftermath of the attack, and pledged further investigation.

"The real truth is the people who were there in Tripoli and Benghazi knew it was a terror attack from the get-go," Issa told "Meet the Press." "When the wheels come off, when in fact people make a decision to give us something that's false and then that's shown to be false, of course we have an obligation to look at it."


Read more: White House: GOP fabricated leaked Benghazi email - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com
Follow us: [MENTION=27326]The[/MENTION]hill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Darrell Issa says a LOT of stuff that isn't true.

Interesting that you would counter this news story that has not/can not be refuted with something "Darrell Issa said". :lol:

Issa is DICK.....
Did you know he is the richest members of Congress ($450 million)?

Pretty good for a HS dropout and former car thief.
 
it is not official at all

they did not alter any emails

but i'm sure the liberal strategy is to flood the board with dozens of threads on this in the hopes of repeating a lie enough times will cause some sucker to believe it
Hey, dumbass - who said altered? It says 'leaked'.

you didn't even read your OP....:lol:

and mischaracterizing them

here is the CBS link you posted:

WH Benghazi emails have different quotes than earlier reported

nice self pwn

must make another :lol: for that embarrassing self pwnage
 
it is not official at all

they did not alter any emails

but i'm sure the liberal strategy is to flood the board with dozens of threads on this in the hopes of repeating a lie enough times will cause some sucker to believe it
Hey, dumbass - who said altered? It says 'leaked'.

you didn't even read your OP....:lol:

and mischaracterizing them
here is the CBS link you posted:

WH Benghazi emails have different quotes than earlier reported
nice self pwn

must make another :lol: for that embarrassing self pwnage
"mischaracterizing" doesn't mean 'altered'.

Damn, you're stupid. :lol:
 
Hey, dumbass - who said altered? It says 'leaked'.

you didn't even read your OP....:lol:



here is the CBS link you posted:

WH Benghazi emails have different quotes than earlier reported

nice self pwn

must make another :lol: for that embarrassing self pwnage
"mischaracterizin" doesn't mean 'altered'.

Damn, you're stupid. :lol:

yes it does, mischaracterization is to change what was actually said...change and alter mean the same thing.... and i notice you failed to respond to the CBS link YOU provided.

i laugh at how dumb you.
 
yes it does, mischaracterization is to change what was actually said...change and alter mean the same thing.... and i notice you failed to respond to the CBS link YOU provided.

i laugh at how dumb you.

Synthia is a hack, and in full panic. She is wildly throwing out ANYTHING is a vain hope that it will derail the prosecution of Obama's lies.

Synthia is desperate - as is the entire Obamunist regime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top