Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really aren't intelligent enough to follow what is going on here so let me see if I can educate you.McConnell shoves back | Fox News
It’s on now - Both McConnell and Minority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, both publicly rejected the Cruz-backed strategy and are encouraging colleagues not to block the House bill. A source close to Cruz told Fox News that the junior senator from Texas was “caught off guard” and “very upset” when he got wind of what was going on, adding he felt like he was “stabbed in the back.”
Over to you, Senator Paul - Both McConnell and Cruz want to defund ObamaCare, but McConnell and others in leadership aren’t willing to risk a government shutdown to try to do so. Conservative lawmakers who have kept mum on the tactical dispute will start to make their positions known today. The stakes are huge. Perhaps the most important voice on the topic will be McConnell’s home-state Senate colleague, Rand Paul of Kentucky. Paul stands with Cruz on the strategy, but will he join conservative groups in condemning those who fail to filibuster the House-passed plan?
Tea Baggers in the Senate actually want to prevent the Senate from voting on the House budget continuation bill that defunds ObamaCare.
so what the hell do they want to vote on? nothing????????
these guys are losing their minds.
They aren't voting against the bill that defunds obiecare, they are voting against cloture which would mean that piece of sh*t ried would only need 51 votes to cut the defunding of obiecare portion of the bill instead of 60. He can't get 60 votes to fund obiecare. That's why when the law was passed he had to use an end around to get it to go the first time. He needs to do just that again to keep it law. If he needs 60 votes he can't get the budget to fail and it goes to president mom pants who will then be forced into a veto or signing the law. Ried is trying his best to not get this weak president in this situation.
I think they're going to fracture into two parties- one: Establ. Repubs representing the rich & the other: social & fiscal conservatives. The Establ. Repubs will naturally be able to outspend the SOCONs during election-time.
They are the rich.
The Democrats more so than the Republicans.
Net worth of United States Senators and Representatives - Ballotpedia
You really aren't intelligent enough to follow what is going on here so let me see if I can educate you.McConnell shoves back | Fox News
Its on now - Both McConnell and Minority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, both publicly rejected the Cruz-backed strategy and are encouraging colleagues not to block the House bill. A source close to Cruz told Fox News that the junior senator from Texas was caught off guard and very upset when he got wind of what was going on, adding he felt like he was stabbed in the back.
Over to you, Senator Paul - Both McConnell and Cruz want to defund ObamaCare, but McConnell and others in leadership arent willing to risk a government shutdown to try to do so. Conservative lawmakers who have kept mum on the tactical dispute will start to make their positions known today. The stakes are huge. Perhaps the most important voice on the topic will be McConnells home-state Senate colleague, Rand Paul of Kentucky. Paul stands with Cruz on the strategy, but will he join conservative groups in condemning those who fail to filibuster the House-passed plan?
Tea Baggers in the Senate actually want to prevent the Senate from voting on the House budget continuation bill that defunds ObamaCare.
so what the hell do they want to vote on? nothing????????
these guys are losing their minds.
They aren't voting against the bill that defunds obiecare, they are voting against cloture which would mean that piece of sh*t ried would only need 51 votes to cut the defunding of obiecare portion of the bill instead of 60. He can't get 60 votes to fund obiecare. That's why when the law was passed he had to use an end around to get it to go the first time. He needs to do just that again to keep it law. If he needs 60 votes he can't get the budget to fail and it goes to president mom pants who will then be forced into a veto or signing the law. Ried is trying his best to not get this weak president in this situation.
Goobers, gotta despise them. No law defunding ACA will go from the Senate to Obama.
Ever.
A 54-vote bill will go back to the House for reconciliation with ACA restored to it, with hours to go before the deadline.
The onus will be on the House if it does not pass.
I think they're going to fracture into two parties- one: Establ. Repubs representing the rich & the other: social & fiscal conservatives. The Establ. Repubs will naturally be able to outspend the SOCONs during election-time.
They are the rich.
The Democrats more so than the Republicans.
Net worth of United States Senators and Representatives - Ballotpedia
So what? This isn't about dems.
They are the rich.
The Democrats more so than the Republicans.
Net worth of United States Senators and Representatives - Ballotpedia
So what? This isn't about dems.
Luckily, that doesn't stop a poster from making an observation on who is rich in the Senate when another poster claims that one party will "represent the rich".
So what? This isn't about dems.
Luckily, that doesn't stop a poster from making an observation on who is rich in the Senate when another poster claims that one party will "represent the rich".
...while yet another will say that one party hates the rich...
They are the rich.
The Democrats more so than the Republicans.
Net worth of United States Senators and Representatives - Ballotpedia
So what? This isn't about dems.
Luckily, that doesn't stop a poster from making an observation on who is "the Rich" in the Senate when another poster claims that one party will "representing the Rich".
Luckily, that doesn't stop a poster from making an observation on who is rich in the Senate when another poster claims that one party will "represent the rich".
...while yet another will say that one party hates the rich...
I don't think the Democrats in Congress hate the rich.
It's just a talking point for them to get you riled up.
They all get their money from the same place...the Rich.
They aren't going to bite the hand that feeds them.
It's all lip service...a ploy to pit you against the rich...give you an enemy.
"Those evil greedy rich people (like me), they are keeping you down (while lining my pockets and stocking my war chest)...bad Rich...Baaaaaad."
Oh believe me he has gone completely over that apex.
what do you think about the Republican civil war?
or are you too busy shaving your teeny-weeny mustache.
I find it amusing actually. I have vowed to NEVER vote in a state/national election again unless its a pro white candidate running. I will stick with the local elections.
Lots of American citizens debate, gather facts, consider all alternatives, take positions, argue---some Republications even do this.
Democrats wait on talking points to ape from Bolsheviks in Chicago and the White House.
You guys regurgitate the same crap over and over again. Bosheviks, Communists, Socialists, Marxists, Commies, Traitors, and on and on. You never have anything useful to say, so you just keep screaming Communists as loud as you can. Barf!
..................................................................
Sorry to offend. I call it as I see it, as you do.
I trace the two opposing political rationales which struggle against each other today back to their original, most accurate, and also most eloquent spokesmen---one might say its founders.
Yours is Marx; mine is Jefferson.
I have to grudgingly congratulate you Marxists. It seems that ever since the old United Socialist Soviet Union crumbled into bankruptcy and disgrace--and ceased to be an example of what not to do for a society---Socialism has been making progress here in the USA....and in fact has taken over the Democratic Party.
You are not really truly insulted to be called a Bolshevik are you? They were the Democratic Party in Russia back in the day. Look it up.
So I ask you again, if this is legislative terrorism, what exactly was Obamacare? They literally rammed that thing down the throats of Republicans, and the American people, NOT ONCE considering the will of their constituents.
The 2012 election was a referendum on ObamaCare.
Supporters of ObamaCare won the White House and the Senate.
that's 2 out of 3.
...while yet another will say that one party hates the rich...
I don't think the Democrats in Congress hate the rich.
It's just a talking point for them to get you riled up.
They all get their money from the same place...the Rich.
They aren't going to bite the hand that feeds them.
It's all lip service...a ploy to pit you against the rich...give you an enemy.
"Those evil greedy rich people (like me), they are keeping you down (while lining my pockets and stocking my war chest)...bad Rich...Baaaaaad."
I can get behind that...but I think the dems give more lip service to the poor and middle class than the republicans.
Luckily, that doesn't stop a poster from making an observation on who is rich in the Senate when another poster claims that one party will "represent the rich".
...while yet another will say that one party hates the rich...
I don't think the Democrats in Congress hate the rich.
It's just a talking point for them to get you riled up.
They all get their money from the same place...the Rich.
They aren't going to bite the hand that feeds them.
It's all lip service...a ploy to pit you against the rich...give you an enemy.
"Those evil greedy rich people (like me), they are keeping you down (while lining my pockets and stocking my war chest)...bad Rich...Baaaaaad."
You really aren't intelligent enough to follow what is going on here so let me see if I can educate you.
They aren't voting against the bill that defunds obiecare, they are voting against cloture which would mean that piece of sh*t ried would only need 51 votes to cut the defunding of obiecare portion of the bill instead of 60. He can't get 60 votes to fund obiecare. That's why when the law was passed he had to use an end around to get it to go the first time. He needs to do just that again to keep it law. If he needs 60 votes he can't get the budget to fail and it goes to president mom pants who will then be forced into a veto or signing the law. Ried is trying his best to not get this weak president in this situation.
Goobers, gotta despise them. No law defunding ACA will go from the Senate to Obama.
Ever.
A 54-vote bill will go back to the House for reconciliation with ACA restored to it, with hours to go before the deadline.
The onus will be on the House if it does not pass.
I'm sure that's the goal of the senate and ried specifically. Eventually your do nothing president is going to have to actually sign a bill one way or another.
The poor are still poor, and the middle class continues to suffer. So that's all it is, lip service.
Really? Civil war? How about liberal fear mongering?
You are approaching the apex of stupidity.
So I ask you again, if this is legislative terrorism, what exactly was Obamacare? They literally rammed that thing down the throats of Republicans, and the American people, NOT ONCE considering the will of their constituents.
The 2012 election was a referendum on ObamaCare.
Supporters of ObamaCare won the White House and the Senate.
that's 2 out of 3.
At the time the Democrats were ramming the bill through Congress, the same polls you are using today said 60% were against the bill, of course, you didn't care because you were part of the 40%, now you are just being a hypocrite.
The poor are still poor, and the middle class continues to suffer. So that's all it is, lip service.
I'm sure they would rather go with the party wanting to cut $40 billion from SNAP
The poor are still poor, and the middle class continues to suffer. So that's all it is, lip service.
I'm sure they would rather go with the party wanting to cut $40 billion from SNAP
No of course they wouldn't. They would rather be spoonfed like children rather than to make anything of themselves. There are rare legitimate exceptions, but normally that is the case.
