Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!

[bedowin62]

Why Do So Many Working Age Americans Choose Not To ...
www.zerohedge.com/.../why-do-so-many-working-age-amer...

• Cached

Zero Hedge
Loading...
Jul 30, 2015 - The key takeaway is that declining labor force participation rates ... Do So Many Working Age Americans Choose Not To Enter The Workforce?

 

[bedowin62]

The Number Of Working Age Americans Without A Job Has ...
www.rightsidenews.com/.../the-number-of-working-age-americans-witho...

• Cached

The number of working age Americans that do not have a job has increased by ... if the federal government was using an honest labor force participation rate, ...

 

[edthecynic]

Although the number of people working part time for "economic reasons" increased in response to the 2007-2009 recession—suggesting that the rise of the part-time worker is temporary—there is also reason to believe that the trends underlying the shift to an increasingly part-time, low-wage workforce are neither short-term nor cyclical.

Graph: America Has a Part-time Employment Problem : Blog of the Century : The Century Foundation

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

See how the Right lies, even after pointing out that PT for economic reasons is DOWN, they still deliberately lie by showing a graph that combines PT for economic reasons with those who only want PT work to make it look like it is the PT for economic reasons that is increasing.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands

When I said more are working part time I made no distinctions, why are you?

Your dishonest source brought up PT for economic reasons and then even more dishonestly used a chart of total PT workers, and you were too gullible to catch the deception. I am just trying to teach you how your Right-wing sources lie to you.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Right, number working in Jan 2009 144.099 million. Number working today (Aug 2015) 123.42 millon

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.pdf

U.S. full-time employees: August 2015, unadjusted | Statistic

You were saying?

LIAR


Total PRIVATE sector jobs

FEB 2001-JUST FOR FUN 111,861,000 (LOL)

FEB 2009 110,698,000


AUG 2015 120,293,00

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Fuck off and die dickhead, I said Jan 2009 and provided a BLS link to back it up. So just take your ignorance and arrogance and shove it up your ass!!!!!!

SORRY DUMBFUK, YOU PROVIDED 2 SEPARATE THINGS FOR THE DATES WEIRD YOU DON'T KNOW THAT?


I PROVIDED THE BLS LINK WITH THE TOTAL PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT BUBS, YOU WANT JAN EVEN THOUGH DUBYA WAS PREZ UNTIL JAN 20TH?? LOL

Put in ANY date you want dumbfuk, it will bring it up, lol

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Well twink, I used the first credible links that had the dates I was looking for. Also my original contention was there are fewer working today than when your dear leader took office, that would be Jan 2009. Try actually reading the complete string before you continue to make a total ass out of yourself.

FIRST CREDIBLE LINKS, BUT WERE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS??? lol

Total private JAN 2009
111,398,000

Total Private Aug 2015

120,293,000


YOU WERE SAYING DUMBFUK?




Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

When advised that the government was cooking the books to show #s not being reflected elsewhere, Dad2three instinctively runs to the ACTUAL GOV'T PROVIDED #s, say's 'look, there's nothing wrong with these #s, they're right here!?! You stupid head!'

 

[OKTexas]

Bill runs down just a handful of times Republicans were not only wrong, but not even close to being right.

Broad brush syndrome much? LMAO
He quotes individuals and tries to paint the whole party with them. How about we paint the whole commiecrat party with quotes form the black panthers.

The difference is that the people he quoted were the leaders of the republican party. The Black Panthers are a small fringe group at best.

Yet you have no problem labeling the entire republican and Tea parties as racist based on a few folks that showed up to an open rally. Go figure.

Nope. Not based on a few people who show up at a rally. Based on the actual republican platform.

 

[edthecynic]

When advised that the government was cooking the books to show #s not being reflected elsewhere,

Sure, it couldn't possibly be the #s reflected elsewhere are cooked.

 

[Dirk the Daring]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

The parties changed...

Bull.

 

[Dad2three]

Although the number of people working part time for "economic reasons" increased in response to the 2007-2009 recession—suggesting that the rise of the part-time worker is temporary—there is also reason to believe that the trends underlying the shift to an increasingly part-time, low-wage workforce are neither short-term nor cyclical.

Graph: America Has a Part-time Employment Problem : Blog of the Century : The Century Foundation

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

See how the Right lies, even after pointing out that PT for economic reasons is DOWN, they still deliberately lie by showing a graph that combines PT for economic reasons with those who only want PT work to make it look like it is the PT for economic reasons that is increasing.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands

When I said more are working part time I made no distinctions, why are you?

Yes, why WOULD WE MEASURE THOSE CHOOSING TO NOT WORK FULL TIME? LOL

 

[Dad2three]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

Workforce Participation rate is at a 38 year low, at 62.6%. 94 million Americans not counted in the work force for the first time in US history. 46+ million Americans on food stamps.

But no, you're right, the economy is doing great...

Called demographics dummy. Baby boomers want to leave the workforce

 

[Dad2three]

Last I checked Byrd and Gore were full blown Democrats. Byrd died just recently. Democrats

The parties changed...

Bull.

Yeah, it was those "liberal/Progressives" in the CONservative CONfederate states of AmeriKKKa that were the Dems? lol

 

[OKTexas]

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

There are more people working full-time now then ever in the history of this GREAT country.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employed, Usually Work Full Time
Labor force status: Employed full time (persons who usually work 35 hours or more)
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

There are more people than ever before, how does that break down per capita? Considering the work force participation rate is near all time lows I would think per capita stats would be pretty dismal.

 

[bedowin62]

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

There are more people working full-time now then ever in the history of this GREAT country.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employed, Usually Work Full Time
Labor force status: Employed full time (persons who usually work 35 hours or more)
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

There are more people than ever before, how does that break down per capita? Considering the work force participation rate is near all time lows I would think per capita stats would be pretty dismal.

i also pointed out HIS OWN GRAPH makes the case for the other side at at least that one point

this loser doesnt read his own spoon-fed shit before regurgitating it.

 

[OKTexas]

Broad brush syndrome much? LMAO
He quotes individuals and tries to paint the whole party with them. How about we paint the whole commiecrat party with quotes form the black panthers.

The difference is that the people he quoted were the leaders of the republican party. The Black Panthers are a small fringe group at best.

Yet you have no problem labeling the entire republican and Tea parties as racist based on a few folks that showed up to an open rally. Go figure.

A FEW? lol


Your current GOP candidates fuel that BS Bubs,PERHAPS GET HONEST ONCE?

Broad brush syndrome much? LMAO
He quotes individuals and tries to paint the whole party with them. How about we paint the whole commiecrat party with quotes form the black panthers.

The difference is that the people he quoted were the leaders of the republican party. The Black Panthers are a small fringe group at best.

Yet you have no problem labeling the entire republican and Tea parties as racist based on a few folks that showed up to an open rally. Go figure.

A FEW? lol


Your current GOP candidates fuel that BS Bubs,PERHAPS GET HONEST ONCE?

Really, what leaders would that be.

Trumpster to start

Then the guys who want to restrict the right to vote, for a voter fraud fraud?

 

[OKTexas]

Although the number of people working part time for "economic reasons" increased in response to the 2007-2009 recession—suggesting that the rise of the part-time worker is temporary—there is also reason to believe that the trends underlying the shift to an increasingly part-time, low-wage workforce are neither short-term nor cyclical.

Graph: America Has a Part-time Employment Problem : Blog of the Century : The Century Foundation

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

See how the Right lies, even after pointing out that PT for economic reasons is DOWN, they still deliberately lie by showing a graph that combines PT for economic reasons with those who only want PT work to make it look like it is the PT for economic reasons that is increasing.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands

When I said more are working part time I made no distinctions, why are you?

Your dishonest source brought up PT for economic reasons and then even more dishonestly used a chart of total PT workers, and you were too gullible to catch the deception. I am just trying to teach you how your Right-wing sources lie to you.

It did, and it said it would not be used unless otherwise noted, there was no deception. Also I said part time workers and I made no distinction, it you folks splitting hairs to try to bolster your BS.

 

[Dad2three]

Although the number of people working part time for "economic reasons" increased in response to the 2007-2009 recession—suggesting that the rise of the part-time worker is temporary—there is also reason to believe that the trends underlying the shift to an increasingly part-time, low-wage workforce are neither short-term nor cyclical.

Graph: America Has a Part-time Employment Problem : Blog of the Century : The Century Foundation

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

See how the Right lies, even after pointing out that PT for economic reasons is DOWN, they still deliberately lie by showing a graph that combines PT for economic reasons with those who only want PT work to make it look like it is the PT for economic reasons that is increasing.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands

When I said more are working part time I made no distinctions, why are you?

Your dishonest source brought up PT for economic reasons and then even more dishonestly used a chart of total PT workers, and you were too gullible to catch the deception. I am just trying to teach you how your Right-wing sources lie to you.

Yep

Why Conservatives, especially "think tanks" Love Stupid People.

 

[Dad2three]

LIAR


Total PRIVATE sector jobs

FEB 2001-JUST FOR FUN 111,861,000 (LOL)

FEB 2009 110,698,000


AUG 2015 120,293,00

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Fuck off and die dickhead, I said Jan 2009 and provided a BLS link to back it up. So just take your ignorance and arrogance and shove it up your ass!!!!!!

SORRY DUMBFUK, YOU PROVIDED 2 SEPARATE THINGS FOR THE DATES WEIRD YOU DON'T KNOW THAT?


I PROVIDED THE BLS LINK WITH THE TOTAL PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT BUBS, YOU WANT JAN EVEN THOUGH DUBYA WAS PREZ UNTIL JAN 20TH?? LOL

Put in ANY date you want dumbfuk, it will bring it up, lol

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Well twink, I used the first credible links that had the dates I was looking for. Also my original contention was there are fewer working today than when your dear leader took office, that would be Jan 2009. Try actually reading the complete string before you continue to make a total ass out of yourself.

FIRST CREDIBLE LINKS, BUT WERE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS??? lol

Total private JAN 2009
111,398,000

Total Private Aug 2015

120,293,000


YOU WERE SAYING DUMBFUK?




Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

When advised that the government was cooking the books to show #s not being reflected elsewhere, Dad2three instinctively runs to the ACTUAL GOV'T PROVIDED #s, say's 'look, there's nothing wrong with these #s, they're right here!?! You stupid head!'

Sorry, I forgot I was supposed to use some right wing bullshit created in the basement of Glenn Beck's followers right? NOT the same data used for generations *shaking head*

 

[peach174]

Under Obama, the three years of economic growth from the bottom of the recession... unemployment dropped by only 1.8 points,

UE was 10.0% at the bottom of the Bush Depression and is 5.1% now, a drop of 4.9% and falling.

Workforce Participation rate is at a 38 year low, at 62.6%. 94 million Americans not counted in the work force for the first time in US history. 46+ million Americans on food stamps.

But no, you're right, the economy is doing great...

Called demographics dummy. Baby boomers want to leave the workforce

Not according to this
1 in 4 Baby Boomers Will Never Retire. The Shifting Workforce | Blogging4Jobs
In fact, one in four Baby Boomers polled claimed they will never retire from work. Many lost pensions, retirement savings, and investments during the financial crisis…and they now must continue working because they have to. Others are simply still working because they can and they still want to!
Read more at 1 in 4 Baby Boomers Will Never Retire. The Shifting Workforce | Blogging4Jobs

 

[edthecynic]

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

There are more people working full-time now then ever in the history of this GREAT country.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employed, Usually Work Full Time
Labor force status: Employed full time (persons who usually work 35 hours or more)
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

There are more people than ever before, how does that break down per capita? Considering the work force participation rate is near all time lows I would think per capita stats would be pretty dismal.

The lies just keep on coming.
The LPR is not near all time lows.

Series title: (Seas) Labor Force Participation Rate
Labor force status: Civilian labor force participation rate
Type of data: Percent or rate
Age: 16 years and over

 

[bedowin62]

the LFPR is at a 38-year low leftard

stop lying to yourself

 

[edthecynic]

Although the number of people working part time for "economic reasons" increased in response to the 2007-2009 recession—suggesting that the rise of the part-time worker is temporary—there is also reason to believe that the trends underlying the shift to an increasingly part-time, low-wage workforce are neither short-term nor cyclical.

Graph: America Has a Part-time Employment Problem : Blog of the Century : The Century Foundation

View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.

See how the Right lies, even after pointing out that PT for economic reasons is DOWN, they still deliberately lie by showing a graph that combines PT for economic reasons with those who only want PT work to make it look like it is the PT for economic reasons that is increasing.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands

When I said more are working part time I made no distinctions, why are you?

Your dishonest source brought up PT for economic reasons and then even more dishonestly used a chart of total PT workers, and you were too gullible to catch the deception. I am just trying to teach you how your Right-wing sources lie to you.

It did, and it said it would not be used unless otherwise noted, there was no deception. Also I said part time workers and I made no distinction, it you folks splitting hairs to try to bolster your BS.

It is ONLY PT for economic reasons that reflects the condition of the economy, so including people who only want PT work as a reflection of the economic condition is completely dishonest, which is why the Right use it.