Republicans how are you going win national elections with minority vote growing?

[Rikurzhen]

No, Republicans don't have policies that benefit whites exclusively. Just 90%.....kind of like the makeup of the Republican Party

The composition of the Republican Party is a direct result of the party offering policies which don't turn off PEOPLE. Most whites hate the racial spoils racket that the Democrats are running.

If you object to the Republican party having such a high white representation, do you also object to 95% of blacks voting Democrat? The solution here is easy - blacks abandon the racial spoils plantation offered by the Democrats and come and join the race-neutral coalition run by the Republicans

What you're doing is like blaming a homeless shelter for offering free shelter when no street bums want to partake of it.

It's not the fault of Republicans that minorities like partaking of the Democrat's racial spoils and that they don't want to join Republicans in a race-neutral policy environment. The Republican door is open to all, all people need to do is disavow racial spoils.

 

[rightwinger]

No, Republicans don't have policies that benefit whites exclusively. Just 90%.....kind of like the makeup of the Republican Party

The composition of the Republican Party is a direct result of the party offering policies which don't turn off PEOPLE. Most whites hate the racial spoils racket that the Democrats are running.

If you object to the Republican party having such a high white representation, do you also object to 95% of blacks voting Democrat? The solution here is easy - blacks abandon the racial spoils plantation offered by the Democrats and come and join the race-neutral coalition run by the Republicans

What you're doing is like blaming a homeless shelter for offering free shelter when no street bums want to partake of it.

It's not the fault of Republicans that minorities like partaking of the Democrat's racial spoils and that they don't want to join Republicans in a race-neutral policy environment. The Republican door is open to all, all people need to do is disavow racial spoils.

Let's go to the numbers shall we?

Democrats Racially Diverse; Republicans Mostly White

Republucan Party is 89% white
2% black
6% Hispanic
1% Asian

Want to tell us more how your policies apply to all races?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Republucan Party is 89% white
2% black
6% Hispanic
1% Asian

Want to tell us more how your policies apply to all races?

You can't spin this, dude. If Republicans offer race-neutral policies and minorities don't want race-neutral policies and instead prefer sticking their snouts into the racial spoils trough offered by Democrats, there's no way in hell you can blame people who oppose implementing a racial spoils system via governments.

The fault lies with minorities who want government benefits due to their racial identity.

 

[Nyvin]

Republucan Party is 89% white
2% black
6% Hispanic
1% Asian

Want to tell us more how your policies apply to all races?

You can't spin this, dude. If Republicans offer race-neutral policies and minorities don't want race-neutral policies and instead prefer sticking their snouts into the racial spoils trough offered by Democrats, there's no way in hell you can blame people who oppose implementing a racial spoils system via governments.

The fault lies with minorities who want government benefits due to their racial identity.

How do you explain Jews and Asians voting heavily Democrat despite not taking as much as Christian whites in Welfare?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Republucan Party is 89% white
2% black
6% Hispanic
1% Asian

Want to tell us more how your policies apply to all races?

You can't spin this, dude. If Republicans offer race-neutral policies and minorities don't want race-neutral policies and instead prefer sticking their snouts into the racial spoils trough offered by Democrats, there's no way in hell you can blame people who oppose implementing a racial spoils system via governments.

The fault lies with minorities who want government benefits due to their racial identity.

How do you explain Jews and Asians voting heavily Democrat despite not taking as much as Christian whites in Welfare?

Jews have historically been very liberal, Jews have historically, because of their minority status, always favored efforts to weaken majority groups.

Asians are heavily represented in Democratic run states and so tend to vote with the dominant political group. You don't see the Asians who live in China or Japan being so liberal that they want to initiate vast importation of Africans or Latin Americans or any other racial group into their homelands. They're not fans of multiculturalism when they are the dominant group. In California and New York, all the political action takes place within the Democratic Party so that's the best place to go to fit into the culture of your new land.

Even that tactic though has limits. Look at how Asian in California sabotaged the Democratic Party efforts to reintroduce Affirmative Action back to university admissions. That was very Republican thing for the Asian-Americans to do.

 

[Nyvin]

You can't spin this, dude. If Republicans offer race-neutral policies and minorities don't want race-neutral policies and instead prefer sticking their snouts into the racial spoils trough offered by Democrats, there's no way in hell you can blame people who oppose implementing a racial spoils system via governments.

The fault lies with minorities who want government benefits due to their racial identity.

How do you explain Jews and Asians voting heavily Democrat despite not taking as much as Christian whites in Welfare?

Jews have historically been very liberal, Jews have historically, because of their minority status, always favored efforts to weaken majority groups.

Asians are heavily represented in Democratic run states and so tend to vote with the dominant political group. You don't see the Asians who live in China or Japan being so liberal that they want to initiate vast importation of Africans or Latin Americans or any other racial group into their homelands. They're not fans of multiculturalism when they are the dominant group. In California and New York, all the political action takes place within the Democratic Party so that's the best place to go to fit into the culture of your new land.

Even that tactic though has limits. Look at how Asian in California sabotaged the Democratic Party efforts to reintroduce Affirmative Action back to university admissions. That was very Republican thing for the Asian-Americans to do.

Okay...so you have Jews wanting to weaken Majority groups...but the majority of Jews live in New York and California.

You have Asians who want to vote with the dominant political party...but in Texas they all still vote 70% democrat....and Asians make up 3% of Texas' population.

Yeah, let's hear the next story...you seem to be full of them. I'm quite interested.

 

[candycorn]

No, Republicans don't have policies that benefit whites exclusively. Just 90%.....kind of like the makeup of the Republican Party

The composition of the Republican Party is a direct result of the party offering policies which don't turn off PEOPLE. Most whites hate the racial spoils racket that the Democrats are running.

If you object to the Republican party having such a high white representation, do you also object to 95% of blacks voting Democrat? The solution here is easy - blacks abandon the racial spoils plantation offered by the Democrats and come and join the race-neutral coalition run by the Republicans

What you're doing is like blaming a homeless shelter for offering free shelter when no street bums want to partake of it.

It's not the fault of Republicans that minorities like partaking of the Democrat's racial spoils and that they don't want to join Republicans in a race-neutral policy environment. The Republican door is open to all, all people need to do is disavow racial spoils.

Let's go to the numbers shall we?

Democrats Racially Diverse; Republicans Mostly White

Republucan Party is 89% white
2% black
6% Hispanic
1% Asian

Want to tell us more how your policies apply to all races?

Have you received all of the "free shit" you voted for?

I haven't.

Of course, I think that is because I don't live in
MS
AK
AL
LA
WV
ND
SD
KY

Of course, with all of those lazy whites in WV, KY, AL, ND, SD, and LA...how can I compete

It must be because they have more females sucking off the teet of the government...yeah, that's it.

Oh wait...

To nobody's shock, the nonsense about it being single women sucking off the government teet is blown out of the water. It seems that the happily married folks in ND, SD, WV, KY, LA, AL, and AK are also taking the welfare dollars from the pro-blue-sing states.

Rikurzhen, You're simply not informed about your opinions and need someone like Fox News to confirm your wild prejudices.

 

[Rikurzhen]

To nobody's shock, the nonsense about it being single women sucking off the government teet is blown out of the water.

WOMEN PREFER LARGER GOVERNMENTS: GROWTH, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION, AND GOVERNMENT SIZE

The increase in income per capita is accompanied, in virtually all countries, by two changes in economic structure: the increase in the share of government spending in gross domestic product (GDP), and the increase in female labor force participation. We argue that these two changes are causally related. We develop a growth model based on Galor and Weil (1996) where female participation in market activities, fertility, and government size, in addition to consumption and saving, is endogenously determined. Rising incomes lead to a rise in female labor force participation as the opportunity cost of staying at home and caring for the children increases. In our model, higher government spending decreases the cost of performing household chores, including, but not limited to, child rearing and child care, as in Rosen (1996). We also use a wide cross-section of data for developed and developing countries and show that higher market participation by women is positively and robustly associated with government size. We then investigate the causal link between participation and government size using a novel unique data set that allows the use of the relative price of productive home appliances as an instrumental variable. We find strong evidence of a causal link between female market participation and government size.​

How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

This paper examines the growth of government during this century as a result of giving women the right to vote. Using cross-sectional time-series data for 1870 to 1940, we examine state government expenditures and revenue as well as voting by U.S. House and Senate state delegations and the passage of a wide range of different state laws. Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise. Contrary to many recent suggestions, the gender gap is not something that has arisen since the 1970s, and it helps explain why American government started growing when it did.​

When society gives women the tools, in this case the vote, that they can use to extract resources from others and direct them to their own benefit, women will do just that.

 

[Samson]

The mainstream GOP has come to the bridge and have realized the reality: so they have pushed the wackadoodles over the bridge, punctured the life buoys, and cut all the ropes, and sunk all the boats. Samson, look up metaphor.

.

++ score for incoherent babble

 

[mudwhistle]

Well, at least the OP author has admitted that flooding America with foreign brown skinned folks is the way they want to win elections, rather than having a superior ideology that will strengthen this country rather than degrade it.

 

[RoadVirus]

I believe in elections, I believe in our leges and courts, I believe in the Rule of Law.

You won't get another chance because the great majority know your type oppose it all.

Despite what you say, so do i.

 

[candycorn]

Well, at least the OP author has admitted that flooding America with foreign brown skinned folks is the way they want to win elections, rather than having a superior ideology that will strengthen this country rather than degrade it.

As you said,

"Blacks are the problem"

 

[candycorn]

When society gives women the tools, in this case the vote, that they can use to extract resources from others and direct them to their own benefit, women will do just that.

Are you suggesting that women shouldn't be allowed to vote?

 

[Bush92]

GOP will pick-up more votes from Blacks now that the obligatory Obama vote out of the way. Why would a Black southern baptist vote for a political party that supports abortion? Also, Whites living in the burbs will get fed up with the higher taxes and redistribution of wealth by Democratic Party and many of them, especially young people starting families who might have been Democrat's on campus, will switch. You will see young Democrat's who voted Obama, become Rand Paul libertarians.

 

[rightwinger]

GOP will pick-up more votes from Blacks now that the obligatory Obama vote out of the way. Why would a Black southern baptist vote for a political party that supports abortion? Also, Whites living in the burbs will get fed up with the higher taxes and redistribution of wealth by Democratic Party and many of them, especially young people starting families who might have been Democrat's on campus, will switch. You will see young Democrat's who voted Obama, become Rand Paul libertarians.

Bill Clinton got roughly the same percentage of the black vote as Obama did. Hillary will be just as successful

There is no reason for blacks to vote Republican

Why don't you give them one?

 

[Rikurzhen]

Bill Clinton got roughly the same percentage of the black vote as Obama did. Hillary will be just as successful

There is no reason for blacks to vote Republican

Why don't you give them one?

The only reason that blacks vote for Democrats is that Democrats support policies which bribe blacks with black-focused policies.

What do you believe Republicans can do to appeal to blacks that can compete with the racist policies offered by the Democrats?

 

[Rikurzhen]

When society gives women the tools, in this case the vote, that they can use to extract resources from others and direct them to their own benefit, women will do just that.

Are you suggesting that women shouldn't be allowed to vote?

Should heroin addicts be hired as pharmacists? Should alcoholics be hired as wine stewards?

Women want resources directed towards them. Before they had the power of the vote they focused their attention on men and family formation. Once they had the power of the vote they felt it legitimate to use the vote to extract resources from men and families in the general public and devote the resources to their own use.

How the fuck is it legitimate to tax men that you don't know so that the resources you steal from them can be spent on providing for the woman and her children?

 

[candycorn]

When society gives women the tools, in this case the vote, that they can use to extract resources from others and direct them to their own benefit, women will do just that.

Are you suggesting that women shouldn't be allowed to vote?

Should heroin addicts be hired as pharmacists? Should alcoholics be hired as wine stewards?

So now being female is either a disease (alcoholism) or a crime (heroin addict)?

Are you still wondering why you guys keep losing the women's vote?

Seriously shitbrains...you're comedy gold.

Women want resources directed towards them.

As if no man has ever voted in his own interest...

Before they had the power of the vote they focused their attention on men and family formation. Once they had the power of the vote they felt it legitimate to use the vote to extract resources from men and families in the general public and devote the resources to their own use.

As human beings...you do agree women are humans right?...taking part in the political process, you are empowered to utilize the vote to attempt to attain funding for projects that are in your best interest....welcome to politics.

The only reason it bothers you is that now women vote more frequently than men and you feel threatened.

How the fuck is it legitimate to tax men that you don't know so that the resources you steal from them can be spent on providing for the woman and her children?

Is there a special man tax that you pay? Last I checked women get taxed just like men unless they are dividend recepients like Romney...then they get taxed much less.

You really cannot be this stupid..can you?

 

[Rikurzhen]

So now being female is either a disease (alcoholism) or a crime (heroin addict)?

That's an asinine formulation. Disease or crime. You cite two different metrics. Those examples were offered because they were unified by one metric - people have a nature. An alcoholic gives into his nature. An addict gives in to his nature. Women give into their nature. They want resources to look after themselves and their children.

As if no man has ever voted in his own interest...

As history shows us, before women received the vote men were able to keep check on the freeloaders who used their vote in order to enrich themselves at the expense of the other men. After women got the vote, the nation's politics got way more redistributionist and we saw government grow and become more intrusive. Women + freeloading men outgunned men who thought stealing was a crime/sin.

 

[candycorn]

So now being female is either a disease (alcoholism) or a crime (heroin addict)?

That's an asinine formulation. Disease or crime. You cite two different metrics. Those examples were offered because they were unified by one metric - people have a nature. An alcoholic gives into his nature. An addict gives in to his nature. Women give into their nature. They want resources to look after themselves and their children.

It keeps getting funnier and funnier.

You brought up criminal activity and disease...not me.

Women give in to their nature? Oh, that must be why the ED industry is a multi-billion dollar industry?

Keep the comedy coming...

As if no man has ever voted in his own interest...

As history shows us, before women received the vote men were able to keep check on the freeloaders who used their vote in order to enrich themselves at the expense of the other men. After women got the vote, the nation's politics got way more redistributionist and we saw government grow and become more intrusive. Women + freeloading men outgunned men who thought stealing was a crime/sin.

Yeah there was never any corruption before 1920.



Again, keep the comedy coming.