Republicans will not debate.

[Lastamender]

They don't want questions about Jan 6th and why so many in the GOP are refusing to testify. AWKWARD!

Because a horseshit hoax should not be considered worthy of their time. Among other things.

 

[Lastamender]

Poor orange douche bag. He really is getting desperate.

How so? This did nothing but make him more popular. You people are idiots.

 

[Anathema]

There is no point in debating with a Liberal. They can never be right and they refuse to accept that fact.

That’s why I refuse to debate anyone on any topic. I already know I’m right, and there’s no point in wasting my time trying to explain to everyone else why they’re wrong.

 

[Independent thinker]

I know... There is fact checkers at it, how is GOP candidate going to win telling the truth...

Solution is simple... Networks give the time for the debate... If a candidate doesn't turn up then give the time to the other as a town hall... Let the Candidate answer the questions with no response...

So, you are in favor of the debates being one sided, one way or the other.

 

[Nostra]

Poor orange douche bag. He really is getting desperate.

Trump didn't make this decision, Dipsqueeze. He had nothing to do with it.

 

[Independent thinker]

The GOP is a sad party. Pathetic really.

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, even Democrats realize they are toast in the upcoming midterms.

 

[candycorn]

It acts like only Democrats are on it. Who are the Republicans?

All republican former Presidents...

The moderator always questions that leftwing journalists and Democrat politicians want the candidates to answer - softball questions for the Democrat, and go-for-the-groin questions for the Republicans.

Candidates are asked the same questions.

 

[candycorn]

Why did the moderators demand Trump renounce racism for the hundredth time and never ask 40 Year Failure * Joe what he meant when he said” If you don’t vote for me you ain’t black “?

Was that when he told a domestic terrorist group to "stand by"?

 

[candycorn]

Fantastic! It’s about the GOP grew a pair when it came to the partisan debates. Remember the time Candy Crowley joined Obama in the debate against Mitt Romney.

Remember the first debate between the two? Romney was declared the winner by like everyone who watched it. Remember when Gore debated W...didn't go well for Albert.

Your assessment of debates being "partisan" are faulty.

 

[candycorn]

That's OK... most of the a$$hat$ that the Pubs would put on the stage couldn't debate their way out of a wet paper bag anyway...

I get very little information from the debates myself. But then again I follow politics pretty closely so its a waste of time from my standpoint. That the GOP is willing to forego the opportunity to convince people is a great sign that the GOP is basically giving up the ship.

They've lost 7 of the last 8 popular votes. Their message is not getting through. So there is little point, according to the GOP's latest move to stop debating all together, to the exercise.

NOW....

Here is the rub. If they nominate Trump...there won't be any debates. Because he'll look weak if he agrees, swear--again--that voter fraud kept him from winning and that will be that. He can't look weak even though he's the most prolific coward on the national stage at this moment.

If they nominate anyone else and the polls not favorable for the GOP candidate...I seriously doubt anyone who doesn't have the "I got cheated" reflex is going to pass on 4.5 hours of free media to convince undecideds or, at the very least, give Biden a chance to do his rain man imitation on national TV. They'd be nuts not to. And what is the GOP going to do with one month left to go in an election if their nominee does take the stage? Urge you not to vote for her or him?

 

[candycorn]

They know their base, those folks will turn out in droves anyway, they are radicalized enough that an actual debate means little to them anyway, and might be a stumbling block if they give sensible, honest answers to questions.

In truth, it means little to me too. But most people don't follow politics as closely as I do.

 

[Nostra]

In truth, it means little to me too. But most people don't follow politics as closely as I do.

Funny shit considering your bullshit thread title.

 

[Batcat]

How? Because they made a debate virtual after Trump tried to infect everyone with COVID at the previous debate?

Possibly just fake news.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

GOOD!

Why waste their time with a bunch of brainless bootlicking Biden buffoons?

 

[Snouter]

The TV debates are tools of Fake News. The moderators are invariably creepy democrats or democrat sympathizers afraid to lose their jobs. This is the internet age. Maybe have questions voted on by the citizens, either way have the questions public before hand so a creepy idiot like Sleepy Joe cannot deliver lies like, "My "Plan" will address that, and will provide "equity" and discriminate against Whitey and stuff."

 

[Kondor3]

Then why do the Dim candidates always need help from the moderator?

Based on Rump's last two campaigns... it was to make him $hut his goddamned mouth and give somebody else a turn to talk...

 

[bripat9643]

All republican former Presidents...

View attachment 587690

Candidates are asked the same questions.

They are honorary members, which means they have no voice in running this scam.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The GOP is a sad party. Pathetic really.

Have not won the popular vote since what Bush I?

 

[Magnus]

How so? This did nothing but make him more popular. You people are idiots.

Popular with trumptards? Those are not very high standards, now, is it?

 

[Magnus]

Trump didn't make this decision, Dipsqueeze. He had nothing to do with it.

Der orange Fuhrer had nothing to do with this cowardly thing? Yeah, that's believable.