ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Mar 16, 2010
- 59,455
- 6,799
Just shows how crazy religious fundamentalist are throughout the middle east. Fuck em all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should she be sorry for putting out a message that was given to her by her superiors? I don't care that is was or wasn't the "best information" they had at the time, the fact is that it was an attack on our embassy, if it was a video, if it was political, or even if it was initiated by a small fringe of idiots, it still was a terror attack on our embassy or installation.
I think that republicans/conservatives have a better case about the procedural issues that may or may not have happened prior to and during the attack. Attacking the "middle man" for a statement and information that she received and delivered, is pretty petty in my opinion.
It was bullshit and she knew it.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
Why should she be sorry for putting out a message that was given to her by her superiors? I don't care that is was or wasn't the "best information" they had at the time, the fact is that it was an attack on our embassy, if it was a video, if it was political, or even if it was initiated by a small fringe of idiots, it still was a terror attack on our embassy or installation.
I think that republicans/conservatives have a better case about the procedural issues that may or may not have happened prior to and during the attack. Attacking the "middle man" for a statement and information that she received and delivered, is pretty petty in my opinion.
It was bullshit and she knew it.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
It was bullshit and she knew it.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
"I was only following orders" flopped at Nuremburg as an excuse.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
"I was only following orders" flopped at Nuremburg as an excuse.
What a sorry analogy for you to use!![]()
What was this lady's position? She was an Ambassador to the UN, she was just relaying the messages given to her from above, I'm willing to bet that she wasn't privy to all of the "real time" information that was coming down the pipe.
It was bullshit and she knew it.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
Bullshit and she knew it.
Why didnt the SOS come out that day?
Why did they throw Rice out there?
Come on man.
You don't know that, it's only your opinion. There's a chain of command and she relayed the message that was sent from the top of the chain of command like she was supposed to do. End of story.
Bullshit and she knew it.
Why didnt the SOS come out that day?
Why did they throw Rice out there?
Come on man.
I don't know if she knew it was bullshit or not bullshit. I do think that it would have been more appropriate for the SOS to provide the statement, but people shouldn't be condemning Ms. Rice for doing her job. The fact is that there was an attack on our Embassy and some of our people were killed, at that point that's all that mattered. Every sane person knew that it was a terrorist attack, whether it was because of some half assed video, or from revenge (as you asserted), the fact is that it still was a terrorist attack. Going after Ms. Rice just makes people look stupid and petty in my opinion. Questioning the procedural issues or lack thereof that happened before and during the attack has much more credence.
Bullshit and she knew it.
Why didnt the SOS come out that day?
Why did they throw Rice out there?
Come on man.
I don't know if she knew it was bullshit or not bullshit. I do think that it would have been more appropriate for the SOS to provide the statement, but people shouldn't be condemning Ms. Rice for doing her job. The fact is that there was an attack on our Embassy and some of our people were killed, at that point that's all that mattered. Every sane person knew that it was a terrorist attack, whether it was because of some half assed video, or from revenge (as you asserted), the fact is that it still was a terrorist attack. Going after Ms. Rice just makes people look stupid and petty in my opinion. Questioning the procedural issues or lack thereof that happened before and during the attack has much more credence.
So why did she deny it was a terrorist attack? Why did Obama, weeks afterward? It was a lie. They knew it was a lie. Yet they told it anyway. Here's Obama lying his fucking ass off.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpIr-wmfEI0]Obama During Weeks Following Benghazi Attacks - YouTube[/ame]
I don't know if she knew it was bullshit or not bullshit. I do think that it would have been more appropriate for the SOS to provide the statement, but people shouldn't be condemning Ms. Rice for doing her job. The fact is that there was an attack on our Embassy and some of our people were killed, at that point that's all that mattered. Every sane person knew that it was a terrorist attack, whether it was because of some half assed video, or from revenge (as you asserted), the fact is that it still was a terrorist attack. Going after Ms. Rice just makes people look stupid and petty in my opinion. Questioning the procedural issues or lack thereof that happened before and during the attack has much more credence.
So why did she deny it was a terrorist attack? Why did Obama, weeks afterward? It was a lie. They knew it was a lie. Yet they told it anyway. Here's Obama lying his fucking ass off.
Do you agree that any attack on our embassies and installations is in fact a "terrorist" act?
So why did she deny it was a terrorist attack? Why did Obama, weeks afterward? It was a lie. They knew it was a lie. Yet they told it anyway. Here's Obama lying his fucking ass off.
Do you agree that any attack on our embassies and installations is in fact a "terrorist" act?
Why are you deflecting from the topic? Rice lied. Obama lied. We know they were lying. Why are you defending this?
''RICE: First of all, there's an FBI investigation, which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today, our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post-revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that's-- that's our best judgment now. We'll await the results of the investigation.''
Susan Rice Calls Out Conservative Media: It's "Patently False" That Administration Misled On Benghazi | Blog | Media Matters for America
I dont. But you're downplaying it by comparing it to embassy bombings and 9/11. So you must not think it's too bad.
Right?
Probably like most normal people he is sick of wingnuts like you trying to make political points out of other peoples' deaths and instead of blaming it on those who are responsible, you go in full ODS meltdown mode.
I find it is indictment on US society that it sad that your politicians (ever since the rabid right went after Clinton) feel like they have to cover their arses because partisan hacks like you and half the other loons on this board support the likes of Cruz, who really don't give a shit about the victims of Benghazi. All they give a shit about is scoring cheap political points on behalf of their peanut gallery rather that actually trying to get shit done.
Like I said before, conservatives are a strange bunch.
If and when a Republican is president and our country suffers a terrorist attack, conservatives will tell us it's time to rally around the president.
When something similar happens when a Democrat is president, they see it as an opportunity to tear the president down politically.
Frankly, what baffles me is how they can't seem to grasp how transparent, petty, and partisan they seem as a result of their political attacks on the president in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on American interests abroad.