candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,625
- 50,830
You were wondering why there are no trials for black folks. Turns out there are.
You'd have to admit that some guy who looks like the pillsbury doughboy driving across state lines to use an illegal weapon who kills 2 people because he was scared they were going to take the gun he decided to bring to the party is a bit of a unique event.Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime, so that would make sense. But I am speaking of what’s happened lately - toms of blacks committing violence at BLM rally’s, burning the place down, destroying property, and yes, killing people - and we are only seeing whitrs hung out to dry.
That is actually a good point.Why no televised trial for that scumbag looter who murdered the retired police captain? That was much more heinous - he shot someone in cold blood when his life was not in danger. Or what about any of the other dozens of murderers over the BLM riots all summer? So far, the only case we see is of a good-hearted white teen with no criminal record being scapegoated.
I don't know why any of these trials are being telecast. Does it add to the justice for the victims or the plaintiff? Pop and Fresh's life will be different going forward; win, lose, or draw.
I really hope that judges stop this silly practice.
You didn't ask but I'll tell you why I think it happens; the judges are vain. I can't think of any other reason....
Anyway...good point.