"Roaring" Obamaconomy has millions more on food stamps then under Bush

[bedowin62]

Table 1
SNAP Benefits by Household Size
Household Size
Maximum
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Average
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2014*
1
$194
$140
2
$357
$247
3
$511
$367
4
$649
$443
5
$771
$521
6
$925
$625
7
$1,022
$676
8
$1,169
$808
Each Additional Person
$146
notice what year it is. doesnt get any more curren then this leftard

 

[paddymurphy]

Table 1
SNAP Benefits by Household Size
Household Size
Maximum
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Average
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2014*
1
$194
$140
2
$357
$247
3
$511
$367
4
$649
$443
5
$771
$521
6
$925
$625
7
$1,022
$676
8
$1,169
$808
Each Additional Person
$146
notice what year it is. doesnt get any more curren then this leftard

Average monthly benefit of $140.00 per person at one person; $146.00 per person after that. 146 / 30 = $4.80 per day, or $1.62 per meal. And you think that is too fucking generous. What an asshole you are.

 

[bedowin62]

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS, 13 MILLION TO BE EXACT, ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

 

[bedowin62]

Table 1
SNAP Benefits by Household Size
Household Size
Maximum
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Average
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2014*
1
$194
$140
2
$357
$247
3
$511
$367
4
$649
$443
5
$771
$521
6
$925
$625
7
$1,022
$676
8
$1,169
$808
Each Additional Person
$146
notice what year it is. doesnt get any more curren then this leftard

Average monthly benefit of $140.00 per person at one person; $146.00 per person after that. 146 / 30 = $4.80 per day, or $1.62 per meal. And you think that is too fucking generous. What an asshole you are.

that is the 2014 number first of all leftard

and LIKE I SAID it is misleading because the "average" includes the SINGLE PEOPLE WITH NO CHILDREN now on food stamps since obama GUTTED CLINTONS WELFARE REFORM

 

[bedowin62]

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

 

[paddymurphy]

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.

 

[paddymurphy]

Table 1
SNAP Benefits by Household Size
Household Size
Maximum
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Average
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2014*
1
$194
$140
2
$357
$247
3
$511
$367
4
$649
$443
5
$771
$521
6
$925
$625
7
$1,022
$676
8
$1,169
$808
Each Additional Person
$146
notice what year it is. doesnt get any more curren then this leftard

Average monthly benefit of $140.00 per person at one person; $146.00 per person after that. 146 / 30 = $4.80 per day, or $1.62 per meal. And you think that is too fucking generous. What an asshole you are.

that is the 2014 number first of all leftard

and LIKE I SAID it is misleading because the "average" includes the SINGLE PEOPLE WITH NO CHILDREN now on food stamps since obama GUTTED CLINTONS WELFARE REFORM

Single people for no more than three months in any year and only while working at least 20 hours per week. While in some states that requirement was waived, the waiver was based on the 1996 reform act.

In the past few years, the three-month limit hasn’t been in effect in most states. The 1996 welfare law allows states to suspend the three-month limit in areas with high and sustained unemployment; many states qualified due to the Great Recession and its aftermath and waived the time limit throughout the state. But as unemployment rates fall, fewer and fewer areas will qualify for waivers. We estimate that the number of states qualifying for state-wide waivers will fall to just a few states by 2016 and that approximately 1 million SNAP recipients will have their benefits cut off due to the time limit in fiscal year 2016.

Lying prick.

 

[bedowin62]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

 

[bedowin62]

Table 1
SNAP Benefits by Household Size
Household Size
Maximum
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Average
Monthly Benefit
Fiscal Year 2014*
1
$194
$140
2
$357
$247
3
$511
$367
4
$649
$443
5
$771
$521
6
$925
$625
7
$1,022
$676
8
$1,169
$808
Each Additional Person
$146
notice what year it is. doesnt get any more curren then this leftard

Average monthly benefit of $140.00 per person at one person; $146.00 per person after that. 146 / 30 = $4.80 per day, or $1.62 per meal. And you think that is too fucking generous. What an asshole you are.

that is the 2014 number first of all leftard

and LIKE I SAID it is misleading because the "average" includes the SINGLE PEOPLE WITH NO CHILDREN now on food stamps since obama GUTTED CLINTONS WELFARE REFORM

Single people for no more than three months in any year and only while working at least 20 hours per week. Lying prick.

you just admitted single people CAN AND DO get them, and said for how long. tha makes me correct you poor unraveling idiot

 

[Camp]

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

 

[bedowin62]

morons want credit for things that are slightly down in year SEVEN from things that reached historical highs under obama in the first place

idiots and hypocrites

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

And you claim that Boosh was not president when the economy tanked?

 

[bedowin62]

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

right idiot; if you're willing to admit obama's "job creation" is mostly jobs that pay low enough for you to be eligible for SNAP benefits well then i'm all ears leftard

but you cant have it both ways

 

[Moonglow]

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

right idiot; if you're willing to admit obama's "job creation" is mostly jobs that pay low enough for you to be eligible for SNAP benefits well then i'm all ears leftard

but you cant have it both ways

Oblama does not create the jobs, companies do...

 

[bedowin62]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

And you claim that Boosh was not president when the economy tanked?

no leftard; i'm claiming idiots (like you) that want to cry about "destructive bush policies" or say bush tanked the economy ought to at a minimum show where dems didnt WILLINGLY VOTE FOR and even CONTINUE the very policies you blame for tanking the economy

try again

 

[bedowin62]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

And you claim that Boosh was not president when the economy tanked?

no leftard; i'm claiming idiots (like you) that want to cry about "destructive bush policies" or say bush tanked the economy ought to at a minimum show where dems didnt WILLINGLY VOTE FOR and even CONTINUE the very policies you blame for tanking the economy

try again

you mean the

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

right idiot; if you're willing to admit obama's "job creation" is mostly jobs that pay low enough for you to be eligible for SNAP benefits well then i'm all ears leftard

but you cant have it both ways

Oblama does not create the jobs, companies do...

"job creators" that the left says havent created jobs but instead "hide their money in the cayman islands" actually created the jobs the Left gives obama credit for?


can i get an Amen??

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

And you claim that Boosh was not president when the economy tanked?

no leftard; i'm claiming idiots (like you) that want to cry about "destructive bush policies" or say bush tanked the economy ought to at a minimum show where dems didnt WILLINGLY VOTE FOR and even CONTINUE the very policies you blame for tanking the economy

try again

I never said that Boosh tanked the economy, stupid bitch..

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 46948

when something GROWS, not slows, and not only grows but EXPLODES under somebody, and is still HIGHER BY MILLIONS ALMOST 7 YEARS LATER, you cant say that is "forward progress" you idiot

It is progress. It helps millions of people who need it. It is a tiny portion of what this nation spends. You want more people off SNAP? Raise the minimum wage. Get the CEO's to earn only 200 times what their average worker makes instead of 300. Most who receive this tiny bit of help are children, disabled, single mothers at home with their children.View attachment 46947

one more time; it isnt progress when it's moving in the other direction

keep trying

And you claim that Boosh was not president when the economy tanked?

no leftard; i'm claiming idiots (like you) that want to cry about "destructive bush policies" or say bush tanked the economy ought to at a minimum show where dems didnt WILLINGLY VOTE FOR and even CONTINUE the very policies you blame for tanking the economy

try again

you mean the

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

right idiot; if you're willing to admit obama's "job creation" is mostly jobs that pay low enough for you to be eligible for SNAP benefits well then i'm all ears leftard

but you cant have it both ways

Oblama does not create the jobs, companies do...

"job creators" that the left says havent created jobs but instead "hide their money in the cayman islands" actually created the jobs the Left gives obama credit for?


can i get an Amen??

The largest employers are the self employed.....and small business owners, corporations do not create that much..

 

[rdean]

Job Openings Rise to the Highest Level in 14 Years - Real Time Economics - WSJ

Lack of skills? We can fix that. All we need is education. So Republicans invest in education, right?

Google


The fuckers.

No wonder business wants educated immigrants.

 

[Camp]

YOU'RE INCAPABLE of intellectual honesty. you show me a graph saying almost 13 million jobs have been "created" under obama. but lose your intellectual curiosity when the question that begs to be asked is how come food stamps is up by 13 million almost seven years into this "recovery"?

Job creation has nothing to do with qualifications for SNAP. People who get new jobs that are low paying or part time still may qualify for food assistance. The question should be how many of those new jobs pay enough to disqualify a persons family from collecting SNAP.
One of the major reasons for increasing minimum wage.

right idiot; if you're willing to admit obama's "job creation" is mostly jobs that pay low enough for you to be eligible for SNAP benefits well then i'm all ears leftard

but you cant have it both ways

No one is asking for anything to be "both ways". I was giving an example of why your concept to recession being the causation of increased SNAP benefits is a bullshit concept. You are changing the subject to create a basic Obama bashing thread.