Roe overturned

[basquebromance]

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I haven't seen left loons so worked up ...well since Trump kicked Cankles to the curb

 

[Sunsettommy]

He really did that in 1982?

I am surprised!

 

[skews13]

So are you admitting there was no federal constitutional statute legalizing abortion with RVW? Thanks

Not admitting anything. Roe was originally a court decision. It was never passed as law by Congress. That was the problem from the beginning. What happened today is a direct result of Congress abdicating its power to the judicial branch. After today

Hardly. You simply cannot bring yourself to admit you are wrong.

The Constitution finally seems to mean something to the court. Good thing too, as that is part of their purpose. Scurry off now, bottle your tears, there's a drought in California you folks could end with little effort.

Wrong. Three other Justices dissented. So their interpretation of the Constitution doesn’t matter? Just 6 right wing religious ideologies, who are now proven liars, and political hacks, have the only valid interpretations?

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

What part of that is not clear to you?

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

How about that one Cletus?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

how did that work out?

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Polishprince]

Yesterday, I could have gone out and gotten an abortion of I needed one. As of today, it's now illegal. So much for deeply rooted traditions.

But the real damage here is that there is not one single Supreme Court precedent that means anything anymore. From now on, all past precedents will be subject to the political leanings of the court at that moment in time. Heller? Enjoy it while it lasts. Yesterday's ruling on gun rights? It has an expiration date.

The democrats will respond with moves to pack the court. Things will spiral more and more out of control in our country. And China will be the ultimate winner.

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

Stare decisis was already a dead letter when the Supreme Court came down with their Lawrence decision which totally ignored Hardrick.

Lawrence established a right to sodomy, that no one ever recognized before.

 

[BlindBoo]

No one took any rights away from women. That decision will now be returned to the states..

Where women are denied the right to privacy, as far as their baby factory is concerned, in several states already by means of Trigger laws. Some States feel like they should own the women I guess.

Psssft, the Neo-GOP and the Great Pussy Grab. Thanks Donnie.

Never trust the Neo-GOP, ladies. Better vote them out while you still can!

 

[Rogue AI]

Yeah all cities are blue. City folk too educated to vote for inbred red.

Yet too dumb not kill each other in record numbers.

 

[OKTexas]

Never in all the history of the our nation, has the Supreme Court reversed itself to restrict individual liberties, until today.

Well that's just a lie, ever heard of Dread Scott?

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure, there will be some states where these laws take effect, but it is certainly not illegal in the nation. That's the point.

Like half.

50 million women

That's the point. Of all of this. Get it straight.

 

[miketx]

 

[USAF 2023]

My advice. Next time swallow ladies

Another piece of advice; Wear a RainCoat

 

[basquebromance]

 

[marvin martian]

Yeah pretty much every city is dem. Fun how cities in states with stricter gun laws have lower homicides than cities in weak gun law states.

Like Illinois, California, and New York?

LOL, you're a fucking retard.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Stare Decisis was dead 150 years ago.

Then why did the lying SCOTUS nominees say otherwise, when perjuring themselves in their confirmations hearings?

 

[Dragonlady]

Wrong.

Unborn Victims of Violence Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

18 U.S. Code § 1841 - Protection of unborn children

www.law.cornell.edu

There have always been laws against harming pregnant women. These laws do NOT give the fetus rights, it gives the mother the right to claim on behalf of her unborn child. BIG difference.

 

[BlindBoo]

Depends on how its interpreted...
A future court could revisit and determine that the "Militia" fragment is the active portion, thus meaning state militias may not be infringed.

It's just a matter of who makes the opinions. Like Kav. said I think.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I think Loving is more protected under the 14th Amendment.

Interestingly, Loving said specifically that marriage was a fundamental right:
These statutes also deprive the Lovings of liberty without due process of law in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.
  Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law.


edit, a quick word search of the new opinion does not mention Loving. Strange.
So, who knows?

Of course, forcing a woman to carry an ectopic pregnancy to term has no bearing on her fundamental rights.

 

[USAF 2023]

Typical Republican White-wing INCEL response.

OK… Don’t swallow. Spit out and gargle