saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Obviously you also have no concept of history, isolationism has done more damage to us in the past than any thing else and we're not empire building, we're empire preserving. Not an empire in the classic sense but an empire just the same. Like I said, who would you want to be the big dog on the block? Us, China, Iran, Russia? You are right, if we become isolationist there will be serious consequences. Unlike you I don't whine when there are consequences, people live and die everyday and it you think about it honestly you'll understand we're all pawns in this huge global "game", even presidents and prime ministers.I watched the video moron, and you missed that parts where he keeps dismissing anything not associated with his "world view" as inconsequential or simple giving it lip service.You really are a blind acolyte!!! I offered you the myriad of subjects to explore that explain all aspects of the issue and all you have to fall back on is I'm offering insults and platitudes???!!!!!! Pretty pathetic.Ok, so you have nothing but personal insults and vague platitudes to offer. That's what i said. I gave you a chance to discuss what in particular you disagree with him on. But you offered nothing. So you can exit my thread now. You've been dismissed. Have a good one.
What in particular do you disagree with him on? Before you answer, maybe you should watch the video. I'll give you another chance. He didn't say constant meddling was the only reason for retaliation. He said it was a major contributor. You can't run around the world bombing & killing, but then expect no consequences.
Oh and obviously he, and you have no idea of how the real world works outside of you encapsulated little world. World politics is and always has been Machiavellian in nature, someone has to be top dog. Would you prefer it be the radical Islamists?
Well then don't whine when others seek revenge against you. It's the inevitable result of Empire-building Interventionism. Stop the meddling and return home ,or suffer the consequences. It really is that simple.
Pay attention, Paulitician, to this ^^^^^.
This is called a counter argument, the one you keep claiming is not forthcoming. You're full of shit and when we present a riposte you whine about insults like Branch Paulinians have always done, whining that Ron Paul was sandbagged by Republicans when he was given full stage to vent his lunacy and was dismissed as a nutcase.
Branch Paulinians, what's WRONG with these people by saintmichaeldefendthem: Branch Paulinians. What s WRONG with these people