Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
Where in 'Heller v DC' or 'MacDonald v Chicago' does it say that the States cannot require handguns to be registered and their owners licensed?Otherwise, the myriad of State gun-registration and owner-licensing laws already on the books, and alive-and-well after many challenges, would not exist.
The challenges you speak of happened before Heller and those challenged laws were upheld citing 20th century legal reasoning invalidated by Heller (that the 2ndA was not ratified to secure individual rights but to secure a state's right / militia right from federal impact) and a longstanding legal holding reversed by McDonald (that the 2nd Amendment did not impede state and local legislatures).
So, ANY law upheld citing US v Tot or Cases v US or their illegitimate children, will certainly fall.
And yes, that numbers in the hundreds if not thousands.
I did not read that in the decision summaries found online in the past few minutes.
Those decisions focus largely upon BANS (de jure or de facto) and NOT upon Registration and Licensure et al, insofar as I've been able to discern from a quick drive-by.
Do those decision either (1) explicitly prohibit or substantively limit such Registration or Licensure or (2) reasonably imply or infer such prohibitions on Registration or Licensing?
If they do, I completely missed those.
Last edited: