Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll get pissed if he doesI don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Shamyou have a wild imagination it must be that TDSIn the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lolTrump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol
Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?
What are Republicans afraid of?Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS
Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers
"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.
"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"
Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham
Yanno, there's a criminal probe underway at the DOJ that could accomplish as much or more of what the Senate would in an impeachment trial. In fact, those who have been informed they are targets or have reason to believe they are or will be targets would have a legit excuse to take the 5th Amendment. A Senate trial may - for good reason - be short and sweet.Here’s how this works you Commie piece of Shit.
You called your witnesses in an extremely Partisan DemTard House Committee Hearing where Republicans were out numbered 24-17.
That Hearing that was Grotesque example of Abusing Civil Rights. You could not even charge The President with a real crime despite your giving The Middle Finger to Due Process.
So this goes to The Senate and Fag Schummer can pound Salt up his Homo Ass.
The GOP will call their witnesses and their witnesses ONLY and you will STFU and like it.
Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.
Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?
Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?
So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.
Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?
Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?
Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.
Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.
Trumps Justice Department is free to investigate Obama any time they want......what are they waiting for?
Yeah, how dare they allow him to mount a defense.How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?
Moron.
Why would Trump testify?I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Shamyou have a wild imagination it must be that TDSIn the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lolTrump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol
Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?
What are Republicans afraid of?Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS
Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers
"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.
"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"
Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham
So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.
Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?
Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?
Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.
Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?
How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. Fuck anything Chuck Schummer wants.
Trump challenged Congressional subpoenas in court, as our system was laid out in the Constitution.So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.
Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?
Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?
Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.
Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?
Was Yermak under oath when he said that?Sondland made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw. “Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky’s advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations,” the report states.
Yermak disputes this. “Gordon and I were never alone together,” he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. “We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out.”
How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. Fuck anything Chuck Schummer wants.
Yermak could have remained silent but he didn'tWas Yermak under oath when he said that?Sondland made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw. “Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky’s advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations,” the report states.
Yermak disputes this. “Gordon and I were never alone together,” he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. “We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out.”
NO!
And notice he didn't deny what Sondland said about Tramp's Quid Pro Quo, he only denied being alone with Sondland.
Remember the Right brag that they lie to the media!!!!!
A better question is: Why didn't the lying scum GOP list him as a witness they wanted to testify????Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?
No, we think you are a dumbass because we are about to fuck your party 10 Ways till Sunday.The President refused to take advantage of due process when he refused to provide individuals and documents to the House proceedings you are WHINING about.That Hearing that was Grotesque example of Abusing Civil Rights. You could not even charge The President with a real crime despite your giving The Middle Finger to Due Process.
Will you think Trump's a coward if he doesn't testify in his own defense at his upcoming trial?
With or without witnesses in the Senate trial?No, we think you are a dumbass because we are about to fuck your party 10 Ways till Sunday.
Why would the POTUS waste his time or give the Hysterical House Dem silliness the respect? Article #2 is already a USSC matter and Senate Repubs will have no prob booting article #1 (Trump is a mean poopy-head).I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Shamyou have a wild imagination it must be that TDSIn the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lolTrump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol
Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?
What are Republicans afraid of?Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS
Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers
"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.
"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"
Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham
How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. Fuck anything Chuck Schummer wants.
How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. Fuck anything Chuck Schummer wants.
There is no such witness, as you well know!Schumer does not want witnesses that would expose the corruption of the Obama Whitehouse and Biden's treasonous use of taxpayers dollars to bail out his son Hunter.
He's not needed lol must suck to have your hopes up to have your president removed and all you get to do is melt like a snowflake lolA better question is: Why didn't the lying scum GOP list him as a witness they wanted to testify????Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?
