Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[easyt65]

For abusing their power in the House, partisanly ramming an admitted political Impeachment down the throats of the GOP, the rebelling American people, and their own party members who are jumping ship in response, because they held the Majority in the House and now find themselves with the proverbial shoe on the other foot...

...you have to admire the balls on Chucky Schumer for making such an arrogant yet childish school yard-type declaration....

...for about 5 seconds.

After that you tell Chucky to STFU, remind him they were warned what would happen if they proceeded, remind him 'here' in the Senate he and his Democrats are just a bunch of 'backseat bitches' along for the ride, and they don't make the rules or demands!

You tell Chucky that unless he and the House Democrats investigated, they and their dark secrets, sedition, and crimes dragged out into the public...Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Comey, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden...Hillary...HE and a significant Senate Dems will support turning against Pelosi to vote to kill their Impeachment quickly, without much fanfare as soon as it reaches the Senate.

 

[georgephillip]

All of them.

Trump ducked his chance to testify in the House.
Do you think he'll man-up in the Senate?

Hey dim bulb, how about you find some actual evidence? Trump is under no obligation to testify in the shit show. You can’t prove ONE thing you’ve ever claimed, so we can just sit back and laugh as all your “evidence” is thrown out as hearsay and inadmissible. Your desperation stinks to high heaven.

Hey dim bulb, how about you find some actual evidence? Trump is under no obligation to testify in the shit show. You can’t prove ONE thing you’ve ever claimed, so we can just sit back and laugh as all your “evidence” is thrown out as hearsay and inadmissible. Your desperation stinks to high heaven

Can't spot the corruption, Cracker?
Maybe this'll help

Nader and Constitutional Scholars Push for 12 Articles of Impeachment | Ralph Nader

"Uniquely among wayward presidents, Mr. Trump is shattering our entire constitutional order as our proposed twelve (12) count Article of Impeachment documents . (See enclosure).

"Several of the counts are per se impeachable and need no more fact-finding: defiance of congressional subpoenas and oversight; spending billions of dollars on a southern border wall not appropriated for that purpose; continuing or expanding presidential wars not declared by Congress; exercising line-item veto power; flouting the Emoluments Clause; and, playing prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner to kill any person on the planet based on secret, unsubstantiated information.

"Hearings to educate the public about the alarming consequences of such per se violations is imperative to fortify the full constitutional legitimacy of the impeachment charges."

 

[Oldstyle]

Heh.
So, regardless of the fact Trump is acquitted, you will still believe he committed those supposed crimes.
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I base my opinions on the facts of the case. Not on a decision by Senate Repubs to ignore the facts and cast a vote designed to save their political behinds.

So you agree: You will still believe he committed those supposed crimes, regardless of an acquittal.
I ask again:
Why are you obstinately and intolerantly devoted to your opinions and prejudices?

I ask again, what does an acquittal have to do with his guilt or innocence?

Thank you for demonstrating your obstinate and intolerant devotion to your opinions and prejudices
Definition of BIGOT

What I've done is demonstrate my obstinate and intolerant devotion to the facts. Trump did what he is accused of doing. All the evidence proves it. You folks...................have nothing to dispute that.

What evidence? The Democrats were the only ones allowed to call witnesses and despite THAT...their own witnesses didn't provide evidence of a crime taking place! Can you imagine how bad it's going to be when the GOP can call witnesses that refute what Adam Schiff's coached witnesses said?

 

[georgephillip]

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?

Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?

Trump challenged Congressional subpoenas in court, as our system was laid out in the Constitution.

Weird how the Constitution triggers you Dimwinger crayon eaters, huh?

Wait ... the POTUS has the right to challenge unhinged congressional demands in our courts? What kind of banana republic are we running here. How is that fair to congress? Why should they have to justify their silliness to a judge?

Wait ... the POTUS has the right to challenge unhinged congressional demands in our courts?

Can you name any "unhinged" demands from congress?

I've found your bananas.

 

[SAYIT]

For abusing their power in the House, partisanly ramming an admitted political Impeachment down the throats of the GOP, the rebelling American people, and their own party members who are jumping ship in response, because they held the Majority in the House and now find themselves with the proverbial shoe on the other foot...

...you have to admire the balls on Chucky Schumer for making such an arrogant yet childish school yard-type declaration....

...for about 5 seconds.

After that you tell Chucky to STFU, remind him they were warned what would happen if they proceeded, remind him 'here' in the Senate he and his Democrats are just a bunch of 'backseat bitches' along for the ride, and they don't make the rules or demands!

You tell Chucky that unless he and the House Democrats investigated, they and their dark secrets, sedition, and crimes dragged out into the public...Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Comey, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden...Hillary...HE and a significant Senate Dems will support turning against Pelosi to vote to kill their Impeachment quickly, without much fanfare as soon as it reaches the Senate.

Chuckie insists on a sit-down with McConnell to determine the "process" by which Trump is to be acquitted which can be done standing up in less than 1 minute.

Schumer: We demand our witnesses be called and respond to our questions with answers we will provide them!!!

McConnell: STF down and STF up, Chuckie.

 

[Nostra]

Oh, so you agree - the federal government CAN investigate Joe Biden for actions he took while an elected federal official, even though he is running for office.
And yet, you think Trump should be impeached for instigating that very thing.

Of course the government can investigate Joe Biden. They aren't, because the allegations are bullshit.

Let me ask you a very basic question. Does Trump have a conflict of interest when it comes to investigations into the Bidens? Does he harbor anti-Biden bias?

Do you have evidence they are bullshit? Did someone complete an investigation and I wasn't aware of it?

And I'll answer the second one - No there is no conflict of interest. Trump is the nations top cop. He runs the executive branch which puts people in jail for breaking the law.

Is he biased? I sure hope so. Biden is one corrupt fucking guy IMO.

Uh, no, Trump is not the nation's "top cop." That title belongs to the U.S. Attorney General, not the president.

Hmmm.... I though the AG reported to the president.. My bad

And yes, I'll admit he isn't but you're being anal-retentive. You know damn well he is responsible and accountable for the what the AG does. So fuck off.

The Secretary of Education also reports to the president. That doesn't make Trump the top teacher either.

What They Are Saying: Law Enforcement, Former Justice Dept. Officials “Wholeheartedly” Support Barr for Attorney General | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

"The Committee on the Judiciary reported his nomination unanimously and the Senate confirmed him as the 77th Attorney General on a voice vote… we are confident that Mr. Barr will, once again, be a stellar ‘top cop.’” – Chuck Canterbury, National President of the National Fraternal Order of Police​

Maybe because the Dept of Education has nothing to do with teaching kids anything, Moron.

 

[Nostra]

Do you have evidence they are bullshit? Did someone complete an investigation and I wasn't aware of it?

And I'll answer the second one - No there is no conflict of interest. Trump is the nations top cop. He runs the executive branch which puts people in jail for breaking the law.

Is he biased? I sure hope so. Biden is one corrupt fucking guy IMO.

Who polices the police?

If a cop is using their authority for personal gain, that’s a problem, wouldn’t you agree?

Sigh... Congress does. Even if they are completely abusing their power apparently. Trump is ultimately responsible and accountable to ensure corruption is being rooted out. Can't wait for early summer. This board is gonna be lit on fire.

How does Congress police the police when Trump is preventing them from doing their job?

He's not preventing them. He's asked for the third branch to look at it and has all the authority to do so. (There is a third branch of the government which plays as umpire when things are disputed between the other two CO_EQUAL branches of government. It's called the judicial branch.)

Why does the third branch need to tell the first branch that it’s okay to oversee the second branch?

Because that is how the Founding Fathers set it up, dipshit.

 

[easyt65]

For abusing their power in the House, partisanly ramming an admitted political Impeachment down the throats of the GOP, the rebelling American people, and their own party members who are jumping ship in response, because they held the Majority in the House and now find themselves with the proverbial shoe on the other foot...

...you have to admire the balls on Chucky Schumer for making such an arrogant yet childish school yard-type declaration....

...for about 5 seconds.

After that you tell Chucky to STFU, remind him they were warned what would happen if they proceeded, remind him 'here' in the Senate he and his Democrats are just a bunch of 'backseat bitches' along for the ride, and they don't make the rules or demands!

You tell Chucky that unless he and the House Democrats investigated, they and their dark secrets, sedition, and crimes dragged out into the public...Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Comey, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden...Hillary...HE and a significant Senate Dems will support turning against Pelosi to vote to kill their Impeachment quickly, without much fanfare as soon as it reaches the Senate.

Chuckie insists on a sit-down with McConnell to determine the "process" by which Trump is to be acquitted which can be done standing up in less than 1 minute.

Schumer: We demand our witnesses be called and respond to our questions with answers we will provide them!!!

McConnell: STF down and STF up, Chuckie.

Chucky can SITDOWN & STFU - He can read the rules of the process when they get dictated to his ass.

 

[AntonToo]

Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

The whistlegossip.

Whistleblower IS NOT A DIRECT WITNESS to anything. He was not on the call and had absolutely no role in dealing with Ukrainians.

Thanks for proving this entire Dimwinger Nazi coup is based on nothing.

Nothing??? Moron, after the whistleblower complaint hit there was an investigation which resulted in a MOUNTAIN of evidence:

facts - Congressionally apropriated millitary aid to Ukraine was in fact held up by Trump and (partially) released only when Congressional investigations opened.

documents - WH released memo of the Trump's call with Zelensky where he complains about Ukraine not recieprocating generous American aid, then asks for political favors in investigating DNC server and Bidens.

testimony - from many people directly involved. Most importantly from Trump's pointman on Ukraine, ambassador Sondland who got the job by donating a million dollars to Trump campaign. Sondland testified to well known among top level WH officials quid-pro-quo effort led by Juliani on behalf of Trump. He also testified to telling Ukranians and other diplomats that everything, even millitary aid release, is conditioned on public anouncement of investigations by Zelensky.

 

[edthecynic]

The Spy and Traitor Who Filed The False
Report that started this whole thing!

Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules.

Name one FACT witness that was refused!

Wait just a minute there Slick, you Nazis have been saying he was a witness to NOTHING, only HEARSAY!

There was a time when Adumb Schifferbrains was promising we would see the "whistelblower' testify..............until it came out he was conspiring with him.


Hmmm...........

As is so typical of the worthless lying scum Right, when caught lying they simply lie some more!
Nowhere in that video did the honest Rep Schiff say we would "SEE" the whistleblower testify. He actually said he would testify only if and when his safety could be guaranteed.

 

[edthecynic]

Citizens Arrest!

Impeachment without a referral for a Senate trial?

Impeach without a Senate trial? The Left's new idea to waste time

"'The resolution,' wrote Tribe, 'expressly and formally proclaiming the president impeachable but declining to play the Senate’s corrupt game, is one that even a president accustomed to treating everything as a victory would be hard-pressed to characterize as a vindication.'

"He argued that declaring Trump 'impeachable' with no Senate referral, would at the least serve as a 'deliberately stigmatizing character' that Trump 'would have to take with him into his reelection campaign.'"

That's right! If the Dems were smart, but they aren't, they would make referring the impeachment to the Senate contingent with McConnell and Graham recusing themselves, and not before.

 

[AntonToo]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

Nonsense. White House already had the complaint by the time whistleblower turned to Schiff's office due to his complaint being burried.

The NOTHING TO SEE HERE! crowd consistently pedles silly arguments that are easily contradicted by the timeline.

 

[AntonToo]

Citizens Arrest!

Impeachment without a referral for a Senate trial?

Impeach without a Senate trial? The Left's new idea to waste time

"'The resolution,' wrote Tribe, 'expressly and formally proclaiming the president impeachable but declining to play the Senate’s corrupt game, is one that even a president accustomed to treating everything as a victory would be hard-pressed to characterize as a vindication.'

"He argued that declaring Trump 'impeachable' with no Senate referral, would at the least serve as a 'deliberately stigmatizing character' that Trump 'would have to take with him into his reelection campaign.'"

That's right! If the Dems were smart, but they aren't, they would make referring the impeachment to the Senate contingent with McConnell and Graham recusing themselves, and not before.

They don't need to recuse, they just need to agree to a reasonable trial process that makes an effort to establish the facts of the matter. And Republicans know that simply burying the whole thing or running a sideshow circus will give political advantage to the Democrats.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

Nonsense. White House already had the complaint by the time whistleblower turned to Schiff's office due to his complaint being burried.

The NOTHING TO SEE HERE! crowd consistently pedles silly arguments that are easily contradicted by the timeline.

If it's nonsense Schiff needs to clear it up under oath.

 

[edthecynic]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

Nonsense. White House already had the complaint by the time whistleblower turned to Schiff's office due to his complaint being burried.

The NOTHING TO SEE HERE! crowd consistently pedles silly arguments that are easily contradicted by the timeline.

If it's nonsense Schiff needs to clear it up under oath.

Let Tramp tell his lies about Schiff under oath first!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

Nonsense. White House already had the complaint by the time whistleblower turned to Schiff's office due to his complaint being burried.

The NOTHING TO SEE HERE! crowd consistently pedles silly arguments that are easily contradicted by the timeline.

If it's nonsense Schiff needs to clear it up under oath.

Let Tramp tell his lies about Schiff under oath first!

Schiff lied and must be held accountable
You need to prove that your president lied. your TDS influenced opinion is not a valid reason.
Usings fake news fact-checkers is not a valid source
GO________

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

LIAR!

Wow. You are unhinged. Panicked even. Do you have some interior knowledge you'd like to share with this forum?

Schiff never met with the whistleblower, as you well know.

You do know Schiff lied about the whistleblower?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

A better question is: Why didn't the lying scum GOP list him as a witness they wanted to testify????

He's not needed lol must suck to have your hopes up to have your president removed and all you get to do is melt like a snowflake lol

He is definitely needed if he is to be used to contradict sworn testimony. Any lies told to the media are not admissible in a court of law. They are less credible than hearsay!

He could have remained silent I'll take his word over Schiff lying ass any day.

Amazing is the diff between our America-First POTUS and our traitorous Dems. Like day vs night.

If the democrats weren't filled with so much hate and as good as the president has been getting America back on track without the help of the democrats, there is no telling what we could accomplish. And the great thing about it is the democrats cannot take any credit

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Citizens Arrest!

Impeachment without a referral for a Senate trial?

Impeach without a Senate trial? The Left's new idea to waste time

"'The resolution,' wrote Tribe, 'expressly and formally proclaiming the president impeachable but declining to play the Senate’s corrupt game, is one that even a president accustomed to treating everything as a victory would be hard-pressed to characterize as a vindication.'

"He argued that declaring Trump 'impeachable' with no Senate referral, would at the least serve as a 'deliberately stigmatizing character' that Trump 'would have to take with him into his reelection campaign.'"

Yep that's going to go great on the democrat platform
we the democrats impeached a popular (with the middle-class blue-collar working-class) president

 

[edthecynic]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

Nonsense. White House already had the complaint by the time whistleblower turned to Schiff's office due to his complaint being burried.

The NOTHING TO SEE HERE! crowd consistently pedles silly arguments that are easily contradicted by the timeline.

If it's nonsense Schiff needs to clear it up under oath.

Let Tramp tell his lies about Schiff under oath first!

Schiff lied and must be held accountable
You need to prove that your president lied. your TDS influenced opinion is not a valid reason.
Usings fake news fact-checkers is not a valid source
GO________

“The noise from windmills causes cancer.”