Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
You missed the esteem "scientists" got caught fudging the data.....again? How many times does this have to happen before you loons catch on you're being duped?
NASASo which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
dude/ dudette, evidence? wow you still on that subject? You still can't present evidence. How long has it been that myself and others have asked you to present this evidence you keep writing about? You sure use a lot of words to try and use that word, but evidence, you ain't got. Just remember that. your lack of evidence has been duly noted.The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
You got some peer reviewed papers that contradict Global warming ?? linkdude/ dudette, evidence? wow you still on that subject? You still can't present evidence. How long has it been that myself and others have asked you to present this evidence you keep writing about? You sure use a lot of words to try and use that word, but evidence, you ain't got. Just remember that. your lack of evidence has been duly noted.The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
You missed the esteem "scientists" got caught fudging the data.....again? How many times does this have to happen before you loons catch on you're being duped?
You missed the esteem "scientists" got caught fudging the data.....again? How many times does this have to happen before you loons catch on you're being duped?
When I pointed out that dishonest conspiracies are all you're capable of, going off on yet another dishonest conspiracy rant is probably not the best response you could have chosen.
Thanks for proving my point. And proving another of my points, that most deniers just aren't very bright.
---I am a real scientist.---Could you explain the logical reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?---I don't own any scientists. (execept myself).---
Who are your real scientists?
.
Huh? Can't name any real scientists?
How lame.
You certainly are not one.
.
In a previous post, you referred to real scientists ("real scientists are not").
I asked you a SIMPLE question -- to indicate who you consider to be a "real scientist" related to the topic.
You get a second chance to disprove my conclusion ...
.
People like the climategate fraudsters are not.
You're willfully ignoring the fact they are fudging the data.
I have seen nothing that says adding 120 PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere as dangerous. do you have that experiment that shows how adding CO2 makes more heat and adds fearsome storms and hurricanes and sea level rise and on and on of the doom and gloom? You got that evidence? post it up bubba.You got some peer reviewed papers that contradict Global warming ?? linkdude/ dudette, evidence? wow you still on that subject? You still can't present evidence. How long has it been that myself and others have asked you to present this evidence you keep writing about? You sure use a lot of words to try and use that word, but evidence, you ain't got. Just remember that. your lack of evidence has been duly noted.The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
Yeah, it's called IPCC AR5 report.You got some peer reviewed papers that contradict Global warming ?? linkdude/ dudette, evidence? wow you still on that subject? You still can't present evidence. How long has it been that myself and others have asked you to present this evidence you keep writing about? You sure use a lot of words to try and use that word, but evidence, you ain't got. Just remember that. your lack of evidence has been duly noted.The "Scientists" are not floored, that is the headline.
The same scientists have stated publicly that they are predicting the Arctic ice to grow in coming years.
So which cult nutter fed you that nonsense?
I do understand why you repeat such nonsense. You'd lose status in the herd if you didn't parrot every bit of kookery you were fed.
Anyways, I think we can all agree what this thread has proven. That is, whenever presented with evidence, deniers have a meltdown and go off into their hysterical conspiracy theories. Given that all the evidence says they're lying, what else can they do?
and you get to make that call how? What are your credentials?---I am a real scientist.---Could you explain the logical reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?---I don't own any scientists. (execept myself).
Huh? Can't name any real scientists?
How lame.
You certainly are not one.
.
In a previous post, you referred to real scientists ("real scientists are not").
I asked you a SIMPLE question -- to indicate who you consider to be a "real scientist" related to the topic.
You get a second chance to disprove my conclusion ...
.
People like the climategate fraudsters are not.
You sound like a crap scientist, if you really have a degree (online?) in a science field.
Like those minority scientists who don't practice scientific methods when commenting on subjects outside their field of expertise.
Still can't name any real scientists?
You're looking more like a joke with every post.
.
Can you quote cite or link to "Real Scientist "....? tee hee[/QUOTE]Fake scientists may be "floored" but real scientists are not.
Can you quote cite or link to "Real Scientist "....? tee hee[/QUOTE]Fake scientists may be "floored" but real scientists are not.
---Can you quote cite or link to "Real Scientist "....? tee heeFake scientists may be "floored" but real scientists are not.
fudging data has already been pointed out in this forum, do a search and I'm sure you'll find that piece on both the NOAA and NASA.You're willfully ignoring the fact they are fudging the data.
Repeating that stupid lie over and over won't magically make it any less dishonest.
However, that stupid lie is all you have. It's not like honesty is an option for you, as that would get you ejected from your cult. You're expected to parrot a certain set of mantras, so you do. Good cultist.
I look at the data. I _know_ you are lying. Everyone who looks at the data knows you're lying. You can't pass off your conspiracy bullshit to anyone who actually looks at the science. You'll keep trying, of course. Flat earthers, antivaxxers, 9/11 truthers, moon landing hoaxers and JFK grassy knollers scream their conspiracies to the world as well, and you're as relevant as they are.
---and you get to make that call how? What are your credentials?---I am a real scientist.---Could you explain the logical reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?---
Huh? Can't name any real scientists?
How lame.
You certainly are not one.
.
In a previous post, you referred to real scientists ("real scientists are not").
I asked you a SIMPLE question -- to indicate who you consider to be a "real scientist" related to the topic.
You get a second chance to disprove my conclusion ...
.
People like the climategate fraudsters are not.
You sound like a crap scientist, if you really have a degree (online?) in a science field.
Like those minority scientists who don't practice scientific methods when commenting on subjects outside their field of expertise.
Still can't name any real scientists?
You're looking more like a joke with every post.
.
