Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then post the articles. Unless you think the press would ignore a sitting Supreme Court Justice that “common knowledge” showed he had a proclivity towards teenage girls.
Or you think the press is unreliable?
Yes, that's exactly what I think. Women who make these FALSE claims should be held accountable for their actions. If I take a walk to my convenient store, get attacked on the way, I don't call the police ten years later. If I am attacked, I notify authorities so they can take immediate action.
Proof. Where is the proof these accusations are false? Because your orange buddy said so? If a woman can't prove it does not make that accusation a crime.
Well I think you were the one that robbed a bank by my house. Prove it wasn't you........
That's the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard. Prove YOU DIDN'T do something.
This tactic was revealed by Mary Mapes, Dan Rather's producer. She was still trying to defend 60 Minutes reporting aka Mythology Entertainment. My jaw dropped when I heard her say that this was proper journalism.
"We accuse, you defend" had become their mantra at CBS.
Accuser aid he did. Moore said he didn't.
Why is Moore considered the truth over the accuser?
What benefit was it for the woman to lie? Go through the embarrassment. Be drug through the mud by the Trumpette, molester supporters?
What benefit does Moore have to deny it? Ummmmm Let me think..........
What actions had occurred in the past? Testimony from several people how Moore went after high school girls at that time, mall employees who knew about Moore chasing young girls at the mall, co-workers who knew Moore chased young girls.
All favor the accuser.
You have nothing to use to defend Moore except Moore's word.
Accuer
Because the the evidence supports him.
The first accusers story literally makes no sense. And she has a criminal record for fraud. She even admits she isn't credible. So why would we believe her?
The second had multiple people contradicting her, refuses to allow independent forensics to examine evidence, and if what I've heard recently had Judge Moore rule against her in a custody hearing. Tell me, you are having a custody dispute, you find out the judge is a man who tried to rape you, and you're not going to make a huge stink about him being recused?? Really?
We are supposed to believe either of them? Especially when you have to supplement it with bs about him being banned from mall despite no evidence. If you have to make things more credible with fake information, you're original argument is pretty crappy.
That's ignoring the timing of this all.
Let me ask you, if Hillary Clinton was accused of molesting children a month before the election last year, despite her decades of controversial public spotlight and it never coming up before, would you believe it and not have voted for her? Especially with questionable accusers?
You've already got Franken and Conyers, moron. You're going to look absolutely silly pointing your fingers at Moore. Your clowns don't even deny their guilt.Look, folks, for me nothing would be better than to have Moore in the GOP senate.....It's a personal opinion, but I DO think that having Moore as an albatross on republicans' backs during the upcoming mid terms would benefit democrat candidates more than any other rhetoric...So,GO MOORE !!!
Of course, people draw a distinction between sexual harrassment and molestation of a child. But not you, no sir. Same thing, in Bripat's fantasy world....
Moore isn't accused of molesting children, douchebag.
Please, explain this "honest look at the facts" to us. Remember, you must account for not just 5 unrelated sources of the accusations, but also the corroborating anecdotes regarding the mall and cheerleading practice.
And don't forget: You have to show that NONE of it is factual, per your haughty claim.
Should be easy for you, since you seem so confident. And....go!
Explain how this “common knowledge” was not used against him by a single political opponent or Media outlet in over 40 years.
I’m expecting the usual response.
Crickets
Sorry to defy your expectations, but I am not as big an intellectual sissy as you are.
The explanation is simple:
Roy Moore crawled out from under his rock to run for Senate in the midst of a nationwide purge of sexual harrassers.
Any questions?
Oh, I see, it’s reverse engineering!
But but but, you’ll need to explain why they never used it against him during the Gay Marriage battle? You don’t think the ACLU or LBGT would have found it useful?
This was common knowledge after all.
And you also think his political opponents wanted to lose in past races?
My explanation covers that: We are in the midst of a national purge of sexual harasses and predators, one which did not exist then.
Seems simple.
The only thing different now is that even some Democrats are wriggling on the hook. The media has never shied away from going after Republicans
That's exactly what I was about to post, but scrolling down, I see you already have. Did you receive a cogent reply to your question? I'm not digging through some 180+ posts to find it.What facts?
You've already got Franken and Conyers, moron. You're going to look absolutely silly pointing your fingers at Moore. Your clowns don't even deny their guilt.Look, folks, for me nothing would be better than to have Moore in the GOP senate.....It's a personal opinion, but I DO think that having Moore as an albatross on republicans' backs during the upcoming mid terms would benefit democrat candidates more than any other rhetoric...So,GO MOORE !!!
The whole town knew that Moore liked to cruise for teenage girls.i notice the attacks on moore have subsided. all the facts coming out just dont support the attempted smear job. you all started the attack to early looks like it will all be cleaned up before the actual election, to bad for you miserable excuses of human flesh.
If you still want to vote for him, stay away from my daughters!
Looks like it was Creepy Roy trying to shoot his wad
Got him banned from the mall
And again, none of that matters, because she's not living there NOW. You can relive glory days all you want, but she lost.but in the end, she's not living in the White House.
Actually, she did for 8 years.......and MORE people voted for her to be in the oval office than the orange clown....LOL
What picture is that?I am much more sickened by Biden. He is definitely very squeaky.
There is video of him trying to touch Sessions' grand daugher (who was 5, I think) inappropriately and Sessions slapping his hand. Hooray for Sessions
Moore was never under any "rock," douchebag. He has been a prominant political figure in Alabama for decades, which makes these accusations highly suspicious.Yeah if you believe all that. But any honest look at facts tells us none of its factual
Please, explain this "honest look at the facts" to us. Remember, you must account for not just 5 unrelated sources of the accusations, but also the corroborating anecdotes regarding the mall and cheerleading practice.
And don't forget: You have to show that NONE of it is factual, per your haughty claim.
Should be easy for you, since you seem so confident. And....go!
Explain how this “common knowledge” was not used against him by a single political opponent or Media outlet in over 40 years.
I’m expecting the usual response.
Crickets
Sorry to defy your expectations, but I am not as big an intellectual sissy as you are.
The explanation is simple:
Roy Moore crawled out from under his rock to run for Senate in the midst of a nationwide purge of sexual harrassers.
Any questions?
He certainly was under a rock for the last 10+ years, and really forever, as far as the national scene goes.. As if you had ever heard of him until a few months ago....give me a break...
Dishonesty defines you. You take out of context pictures of normal actions and label a good man a child molestet? Seriously? If do he nust of sxads of accusers.We had Joe Biden an absolute child molester/pervert in the office… Do you know the Vice President.What facts?
Hypocrisy defines you
Moore was never under any "rock," douchebag. He has been a prominant political figure in Alabama for decades, which makes these accusations highly suspicious.Please, explain this "honest look at the facts" to us. Remember, you must account for not just 5 unrelated sources of the accusations, but also the corroborating anecdotes regarding the mall and cheerleading practice.
And don't forget: You have to show that NONE of it is factual, per your haughty claim.
Should be easy for you, since you seem so confident. And....go!
Explain how this “common knowledge” was not used against him by a single political opponent or Media outlet in over 40 years.
I’m expecting the usual response.
Crickets
Sorry to defy your expectations, but I am not as big an intellectual sissy as you are.
The explanation is simple:
Roy Moore crawled out from under his rock to run for Senate in the midst of a nationwide purge of sexual harrassers.
Any questions?
He certainly was under a rock for the last 10+ years, and really forever, as far as the national scene goes.. As if you had ever heard of him until a few months ago....give me a break...
Again, not true. Moore was in the national news for months at a time because of the flap over the 10 commandments in his courtroom.
Moore was never under any "rock," douchebag. He has been a prominant political figure in Alabama for decades, which makes these accusations highly suspicious.Please, explain this "honest look at the facts" to us. Remember, you must account for not just 5 unrelated sources of the accusations, but also the corroborating anecdotes regarding the mall and cheerleading practice.
And don't forget: You have to show that NONE of it is factual, per your haughty claim.
Should be easy for you, since you seem so confident. And....go!
Explain how this “common knowledge” was not used against him by a single political opponent or Media outlet in over 40 years.
I’m expecting the usual response.
Crickets
Sorry to defy your expectations, but I am not as big an intellectual sissy as you are.
The explanation is simple:
Roy Moore crawled out from under his rock to run for Senate in the midst of a nationwide purge of sexual harrassers.
Any questions?
He certainly was under a rock for the last 10+ years, and really forever, as far as the national scene goes.. As if you had ever heard of him until a few months ago....give me a break...
Bullshit he was under a rock.