Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Warren: 1/32nd Indian - claims to be Native American.
Obama: 1/2 white claims to be African American.
Can't either of them be just AMERICAN?
She's more corrupt than most in the senate:
Elizabeth Warren helped protect Dow Chemical against breast implant claims
Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington?s ?Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians? | Judicial Watch
And of course the high cheek bones that the OP is trying to preempt:
For Elizabeth Warren, a bump becomes a hurdle - The Washington Post
This lady is rotten and corrupt but as long as she has a D beside her name WC will play along and claim her innocence.
Wry has focused the thread on the ideas Sen. Warren proffered; you choose to derail the thread by attacking her character, and mine.
On the contrary, you posted a fluff piece and were shocked, "shocked I tell you!" that she is nothing more than your typical, average, corrupt politician who just happens to be a little more brazen than the others.
I welcome a run from this fraud. She's not as smart as Hillary, and will be destroyed if she goes national.
only a rabid left-wing Soros-tard of the kind infecting these boards uses Mother Jones as a source
this is the same kind of idiot leftist that dismisses anything put out there by anybody OTHER than far-Left sources
libs are crybabies who want it both ways
Mother Jones is not exactly an unbiased source.
As for the article about the 10 things the CFPB has done, most of that is bullshit. Foreclosures are up. And did you look at those paltry amounts the fines have been? It's a speeding ticket.
But like I said, I strongly believe in a level playing field. Unfortunately, the "reforms" that have been enacted have not even come close to achieving that. Reform was not just suffocated in the crib, it was gutted and eaten.
"Mother Jones" leans left, the posts above attacking Sen. Warren are not fair or balanced, are they?
Reform requires reformers and a willingness to compromise for the benefit of the many. Real Breaking News is when a member of the H. of Rep. Republican Caucus doesn't vote in lock-step.
lock-step
comical; there is much more diversity of opinion in the Republican Party
libs are losers who lie to themselves
only a rabid left-wing Soros-tard of the kind infecting these boards uses Mother Jones as a source
this is the same kind of idiot leftist that dismisses anything put out there by anybody OTHER than far-Left sources
libs are crybabies who want it both ways
On some level you must know how stupid you truly are. I'd bet you 'learned' that you were a little slow by the second or third grade.
Obama a wealth distribution socialist? How so?
Seriously? Here's an example: ObamaCare. Obama's signature achievement. Forcing healthy people to buy health insurance so they can overpay in order to offset the subsidies which support health insurance for high school dropouts.
And look at all the increased taxes in ObamaCare which are there to pay for those subsidies.
That's wealth redistribution.
It's also socialism since the State is taking over the production of health care. It now acts as gatekeeper to your access to health care, and determines how much and what kind of insurance you must have, and how much your employer must give you, and how much profit the insurance corporations are allowed to make!
And Warren and her ilk are right there, cheering this on.
mmm, do you support those who do not buy auto insurance since they have never had an accident a good policy? Or believe we should all wait until we suffer a heart attack or cancer before we try to buy health insurance? Was the previous system better, when the tax payers subsidized the uninsured by providing them health care in emergency rooms and public hospitals?
I believe in creating a level playing field. Warren believes in robbing from the rich, guilty and innocent alike, and giving to the poor, guilty and innocent alike.
Can you point me to some examples?
Examples of what? Warren being a class war redistributionist?
No problem!
Ok, well maybe that was just the quickest that you could come up with, but what she is saying in that video doesn't support what you are saying imho. But the point may be moot. I may never have the opportunity to vote for or against her. If I do have to, I'll do a lot more research. But thanks. I do see where some folks might assume that's what she is, but what she says in the video doesn't support it.
"As a child in small-town Oklahoma, Elizabeth Warren yearned to go to college and then become an elementary school teacheran ambitious goal, given her familys modest means. Early marriage and motherhood seemed to put even that dream out of reach, but fifteen years later she was a distinguished law professor with a deep understanding of why people go bankrupt. Then came the phone call that changed her life: could she come to Washington DC to help advise Congress on rewriting the bankruptcy laws?
Thus began an impolite education into the bare-knuckled, often dysfunctional ways of Washington. She fought for better bankruptcy laws for ten years and lost. She tried to hold the federal government accountable during the financial crisis but became a target of the big banks. She came up with the idea for a new agency designed to protect consumers from predatory bankers and was denied the opportunity to run it. Finally, at age 62, she decided to run for elective office and won the most competitiveand watchedSenate race in the country.
In this passionate, funny, rabble-rousing book, Warren shows why she has chosen to fight tooth and nail for the middle classand why she has become a hero to all those who believe that Americas government can and must do better for working families."
A Fighting Chance: Elizabeth Warren: 9781627790529: Amazon.com: Books
Interiew on PBS: Sen. Warren on ?A Fighting Chance? for every American
And now the stupidest among us can replay Native American jokes since they have no ability to counter Sen. Warren's words.
Ok, well maybe that was just the quickest that you could come up with, but what she is saying in that video doesn't support what you are saying imho. But the point may be moot. I may never have the opportunity to vote for or against her. If I do have to, I'll do a lot more research. But thanks. I do see where some folks might assume that's what she is, but what she says in the video doesn't support it.
She wants to tax the rich more for roads and bridges. As if the rich are the only ones who use roads and bridges.
Simple as that.
Ok, well maybe that was just the quickest that you could come up with, but what she is saying in that video doesn't support what you are saying imho. But the point may be moot. I may never have the opportunity to vote for or against her. If I do have to, I'll do a lot more research. But thanks. I do see where some folks might assume that's what she is, but what she says in the video doesn't support it.
She wants to tax the rich more for roads and bridges. As if the rich are the only ones who use roads and bridges.
Simple as that.
A progressive income tax (which I favor) does just that. So her advocating a progressive tax system isn't a deal breaker for me.
Bah! What the hell do I know. I should just narrow my thinking down to a bumper sticker bandwidth and just go around calling her Fauxcahontas and guffaw like a rube. Then accuse others of being low information voters.
Ok, well maybe that was just the quickest that you could come up with, but what she is saying in that video doesn't support what you are saying imho. But the point may be moot. I may never have the opportunity to vote for or against her. If I do have to, I'll do a lot more research. But thanks. I do see where some folks might assume that's what she is, but what she says in the video doesn't support it.
She wants to tax the rich more for roads and bridges. As if the rich are the only ones who use roads and bridges.
Simple as that.
A progressive income tax (which I favor) does just that. So her advocating a progressive tax system isn't a deal breaker for me.
"As a child in small-town Oklahoma, Elizabeth Warren yearned to go to college and then become an elementary school teacheran ambitious goal, given her familys modest means. Early marriage and motherhood seemed to put even that dream out of reach, but fifteen years later she was a distinguished law professor with a deep understanding of why people go bankrupt. Then came the phone call that changed her life: could she come to Washington DC to help advise Congress on rewriting the bankruptcy laws?
Thus began an impolite education into the bare-knuckled, often dysfunctional ways of Washington. She fought for better bankruptcy laws for ten years and lost. She tried to hold the federal government accountable during the financial crisis but became a target of the big banks. She came up with the idea for a new agency designed to protect consumers from predatory bankers and was denied the opportunity to run it. Finally, at age 62, she decided to run for elective office and won the most competitiveand watchedSenate race in the country.
In this passionate, funny, rabble-rousing book, Warren shows why she has chosen to fight tooth and nail for the middle classand why she has become a hero to all those who believe that Americas government can and must do better for working families."
A Fighting Chance: Elizabeth Warren: 9781627790529: Amazon.com: Books
Interiew on PBS: Sen. Warren on ?A Fighting Chance? for every American
And now the stupidest among us can replay Native American jokes since they have no ability to counter Sen. Warren's words.
She wants to tax the rich more for roads and bridges. As if the rich are the only ones who use roads and bridges.
Simple as that.
A progressive income tax (which I favor) does just that. So her advocating a progressive tax system isn't a deal breaker for me.
We already have a progressive tax system. She wants MORE from the rich.
I'm perfectly okay with a progressive tax system. That is what Thomas Jefferson himself advocated.
There are progressive taxes, and then there are punitive taxes. Warren feeds into the mentality that all rich people's money are ill-gotten gains and are therefore pilferable. This is how they allay their guilty consciences. They have to justify in their minds that what they are stealing belongs to them.
