Senator Elizabeth Warren introduces '$10 a day' child care legislation

[Tommy Tainant]

Sounds stupid. This kind of short sighted bullshit isn't well thought out and will cost plenty more than suggested.

Not only will legions of welfare workers have to be employed to certify and make the payments, but the whole system will push demand for child care and the price to new heights.

The old supply-demand graph, if you'll remember Econ 101.

I predict that if this is enacted, millions of broads will be using this system to get subsidized child care that they will be using so they can be engaged in their own childcare business watching other children at taxpayer expense.

People think that poverty stricken indigents are "stupid", but nothing could be further from the truth. They will figure out exactly how to profit from this Atrocity before the ink is dry.

No. Mpre people ill open child care businesses and the price will come down. You need to trust to the markets.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You loon. Nobody has to have a kid.... lack of personal responsibility creates their own dilemma

Abortion is illegal in the backward parts of America. Those victims are entitled to help with the kids you made them have.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Abortion is illegal in the backward parts of America. Those victims are entitled to help with the kids you made them have.

I never made anyone get pregnant.

They chose that. You're looking silly here, Stumps

 

[Polishprince]

No. Mpre people ill open child care businesses and the price will come down. You need to trust to the markets.

Why would the price ever come down, when the government is throwing billions of dollars at the market?

And since the user of the services will have their costs capped, there will be no motivation for any owner of a child care business to reduce prices.

You are right that there will be a lot more child care businesses, people will send their children off to a child care provider so they can open their own facility at home.

And Uncle Sam will be paying for it.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why would the price ever come down, when the government is throwing billions of dollars at the market?

And since the user of the services will have their costs capped, there will be no motivation for any owner of a child care business to reduce prices.

You are right that there will be a lot more child care businesses, people will send their children off to a child care provider so they can open their own facility at home.

And Uncle Sam will be paying for it.

You sound like a commie.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Don't you think that paying $50 a week for child care rather than $50 per day will help families deal with that inflation problem????

Who pays the rest dip shit?

 

[Catman51]

They're not, that said I'll help any child in need. It's not a child's fault it's parents are irresponsible assholes

True, but since children tend to emulate their parents all this would do is perpetuate the welfare class and breed future government dependency.

 

[JustAGuy1]

You sound like a commie.

It could be worse, he could sound like a Tommy.

 

[progressive hunter]

Pregnancy crisis centers???? What useless places those are. Lying to and misleading women about the dangers of abortion.

Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical

Crisis pregnancy centers violate ethical principles by providing misleading information and causing delays and inequities in access to abortion.

journalofethics.ama-assn.org

âItâs a public health riskâ: nurse decries infection control at US anti-abortion crisis center

A Kentucky nurse tried to hold a pregnancy center accountable for the problems she saw – but such facilities are subject to little regulation

www.theguardian.com

Op-Ed: Only states can stop antiabortion 'crisis pregnancy centers' from deceiving consumers

Lawmakers should crack down on these organizations, which pose as healthcare providers but aren't bound by medical laws or ethics.

www.latimes.com

The Disinformation Campaign Behind a Top Pregnancy Website - Reveal

Hospitals, government agencies and major news organizations all cite it as a neutral source of mom-friendly advice. But dig a little deeper, and its anti-abortion roots are clear.

revealnews.org

are you saying killing a child is a good thing??

figures a worn out 5 dollar street whore would think such a vile thing,,

bet your cooch is 10 ft wide and hanging like shower curtain, after all the cocks youve had in it and all the children youve had torn from it,,

prolly stinks a lot too,,

 

[maybelooking]

Women have to have kids in a lot of states. Your thinking is not joined up.

you're retarded.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

you're retarded.

You are retarded if you dont support this initial measure,
Its such a simple proposition that even a conservative should understand it.

 

[USAF 2023]

As one of only a few posters at USMB with a young son at home, I know how hard it can be to find affordable child care you can rely on. That's why I'm calling on everyone, politicians and citizens alike, to join Pocahontas in her FIGHT to give America's working families a helping hand.

Warren introduces '$10 a day' child care legislation

The proposal would drastically reduce child care costs for Massachusetts families.

www.cbsnews.com

Please tell us how these caretakers would get paid?

 

[USAF 2023]

As one of only a few posters at USMB with a young son at home, I know how hard it can be to find affordable child care you can rely on. That's why I'm calling on everyone, politicians and citizens alike, to join Pocahontas in her FIGHT to give America's working families a helping hand.

Warren introduces '$10 a day' child care legislation

The proposal would drastically reduce child care costs for Massachusetts families.

www.cbsnews.com

Please tell us how the caretakers would get paid

 

[USAF 2023]

Employers hire illegals. Illegals get paid. They pay people to watch their kids.

Under the table!!!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

We dont live in the 50s anymre. 2 wages are needed in every household.

In the 50’s the average family size was 4.5 the average home was 983 square feet. Kids shared rooms. One income was sufficient to support that. Today everyone thinks they deserve more, and you can have more, for a price. Average family size is down to 3, home size is 2700 square feet. It takes more money to have that home and give the one kid more than three ever dreamed of in the 50’s. It takes two incomes because of your demands. Has nothing to do with needing more welfare.

 

[Lisa558]

We dont live in the 50s anymre. 2 wages are needed in every household.

Not necessarily. The socialist Indian wants to force people to pay the child care expenses of those bringing in as much as $130,000. If that’s a husband earning $80,000 and a wife earning $50,000, the family of three - with the child - can make do renting a modest home.

 

[Lisa558]

Women have to have kids in a lot of states. Your thinking is not joined up.

What do you mean women HAVE to have kids? Nobody has to have kids.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

A big part of the problem is that couples want to live in big houses, eat out, go on expensive vacations - and that takes two incomes.

When I was growing up, the moms stayed home with their kids (at least until they were in school) and the dads worked. Did that mean that we had to live in a 1200 sf house with one bathroom? Yes, and we were perfectly happy.

People who choose to have children must sacrifice, at least in the early years, by living very modestly - as opposed to living a $130,000 HHI lifestyle and then expecting other people to pay for child care.

WINNER!!!!!

 

[Marener]

I thought Republicans wanted people to have more kids?

This seems like a good thing.

 

[Polishprince]

You sound like a commie.

Since when do "commies" pay attention to simple economics? in fact commies are just part of the liberal spectrum that are economics deniers who act surprised when their schemes don't come together.