Senator Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

[basquebromance]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

 

[Gracie]

I really like Cruz. I didn't use to, but....of all the assholes that never had Trumps back...he has shown otherwise.

 

[Moonglow]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

 

[progressive hunter]

I really like Cruz. I didn't use to, but....of all the assholes that never had Trumps back...he has shown otherwise.

thats because you have reverse TDS,,, cruz has always been a good supporter of the constitution and when the rubber meets the road he ten times better on it than trump,,,

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

I really like Cruz. I didn't use to, but....of all the assholes that never had Trumps back...he has shown otherwise.

Cruz is a cuck. Plain and simple.
Sorry, this won't make it to the SC.
Maybe they can get Levin to hold one of his "mock" trials.

 

[progressive hunter]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

you run with that,, just dont get mad if it gets bigger than that,,,

 

[excalibur]

Cruz has argued any number of cases in front of the Court; he was the Texas Solicitor General for more than 5 years.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Cruz so far seems legit. Or, he just may be a good actor. He was loyal to Trump when Trump endorsed him and he won a tough battle vs deep alt-left money against Beto. I'm surprised that he has it in him thus far, I thought he was a swamp thing.

Maybe he's not as far right as I once thought. I do disagree with him when he says that GOP will win future elections if Trump loses though. It's going to be a wave of beautiful socialism for some time.

 

[excalibur]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

LOL And had they sued before harm was done in an election the court would have said no, you can't sue until actual harm has been done to the plaintiff.

 

[White 6]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

I don't like him, but he is a heck of a lot better lawyer than Rudy, especially since Rudy has shot whatever credibility he ever had by going into court half cocked and without ammo. Doubt any of this goes to The Supremes.

 

[Winston]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

 

[Crepitus]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

What is he gonna say?

"We lost, but we didn't want to, make us the winners please"?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

It decides if we are a country run by laws or men.

If they filed before the election they would have no standing. So by your logic you can’t sue before the election due to standing and you can’t sue afterward because it’s too late.

 

[Gracie]

If 1 death out of 10,000 cases is enough to shut down the country, then 1 fraudulent vote out of 10,000 (there's way more) should shut down the election process until a FULL audit of every ballot & machine in conducted.

 

[Moonglow]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

It decides if we are a country run by laws or men.

If they filed before the election they would have no standing. So by your logic you can’t sue before the election due to standing and you can’t sue afterward because it’s too late.

It takes time to meander through the courts and the issue argued is over state constitutionality of the legislature's approval to use non-reciprocal mail in voting ballots by legislation and not amending it to the state constitution.. You can take it for what it is and leave out yer suppositions and wild allegations.

 

[JimH52]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

What is he gonna say?

"We lost, but we didn't want to, make us the winners please"?

He might have trouble, since it is now a known alternative fact within the GOP ranks that his father actually helped kill JFK.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

that's my boy! it's a long shot but there is hope!

Ted Cruz volunteers to argue overturning the election before the US Supreme Court

On Fox New Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) volunteered to give oral arguments for a case seeking to overturn the result of the election in Pennsylvania if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the matter."As I said last week, the bitter division and acrimony we see across the Nation needs resolution,"...

www.rawstory.com

That’s your ignorant idiot.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If 1 death out of 10,000 cases is enough to shut down the country, then 1 fraudulent vote out of 10,000 (there's way more) should shut down the election process until a FULL audit of every ballot & machine in conducted.

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It only involves an issue of state constitutionality of legislation passed on mail in voting. The Penn. SC said they had waited too long to argue the matter. If it rules in favor of the matter it only affect Penn. not any other state.

It decides if we are a country run by laws or men.

If they filed before the election they would have no standing. So by your logic you can’t sue before the election due to standing and you can’t sue afterward because it’s too late.

It takes time to meander through the courts and the issue argued is over state constitutionality of the legislature's approval to use non-reciprocal mail in voting ballots by legislation and not amending it to the state constitution.. You can take it for what it is and leave out yer suppositions and wild allegations.

When does such a thing become unconstitutional? The day it’s passed?

man unconstitutional law can’t be held as legal because of timing. Just because it wasn’t struck down earlier doesn’t mean we have to live with the results.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

Ted “the cuck” Cruz? He’s only looking to score brownie points with the presumed GOP king maker — Trumpy.