Sexual child molester Josh Duggar had not just 1, but 2 Ashley Madison accounts...

All this nonsense about the people talking about this is hilarious.

If Josh Dugger hadn't been preaching and politicking for "family values" and fighting to deny others the ability to marry, no one would care.

But when you stand up and scream about gay marriage being a danger to the institution of marriage, and then get bust cheating on their wife, it is news.
 
All this nonsense about the people talking about this is hilarious.

If Josh Dugger hadn't been preaching and politicking for "family values" and fighting to deny others the ability to marry, no one would care.

But when you stand up and scream about gay marriage being a danger to the institution of marriage, and then get bust cheating on their wife, it is news.


Actually, I'm starting to wonder if he was also surfing the gay dating services, whatever they're called...

Apparently, for a horny young toad like Josh Duggar, shining example of Christianity, there can never be enough pussy...
 
And chilluns, what do we learn from this?

We learn that if you want some nice hot pussy on the side, don't pay for it with credit-card.
 
it is amazing what lengths these people will go to for money.....and are all the women taught that fake ass smile?
 
..I suppose, so he could have double the amount of extra-marital affairs, in the name of Jesus, of course:

Family Values Activist Josh Duggar Had a Paid Ashley Madison Account

This information was just released.


Quote:

"...data released online in the wake of the hack on Ashley Madison’s servers certainly seems to show otherwise. Someone using a credit card belonging to a Joshua J. Duggar, with a billing address that matches the home in Fayetteville, Arkansas owned by his grandmother Mary—a home that was consistently shown on their now-cancelled TV show, and in which Anna Duggar gave birth to her first child—paid a total of $986.76 for two different monthly Ashley Madison subscriptions from February of 2013 until May of 2015.

1393225516779136939.png


According to the data, Josh Duggar was paying Ashley Madison in order to find an extramarital partner for the following acts:

“Conventional Sex,” Experimenting with Sex Toys,” One-Night Stands,” “Open to Experimentation,” “Gentleness,” “Good With Your Hands,” Sensual Massage,” “Extended Foreplay/Teasing,” “Bubble Bath for 2,” “Likes to Give Oral Sex,” “Likes to Receive Oral Sex,” “Someone I Can Teach,” “Someone Who Can Teach Me,” “Kissing,” “Cuddling & Hugging,” “Sharing Fantasies,” “Sex Talk.”

And here are the turn-ons that he offered up in service of finding a compatible person other than his wife with which to engage in those acts:

“A Professional/Well Groomed,” “Stylish/Classy,” “Casual Jeans/T-shirt Type,” “Muscular/Fit Body,” ”Petite Figure,” “Tall Height,” “Short Height,” “Long Hair,””Short Hair,” “Girl Next Door,” “Naughty Girl,” “Sense of Humor,” “Imagination,” “Creative and Adventurous,” “Relaxed and Easy Going,” “Aggressive/Take Charge Nature,” “Confidence,” “Discretion/Secrecy,” “A Good Listener,” “Good Personal Hygiene,” “Average Sex Drive,” “High Sex Drive,” “Dislikes Routine,” “Has a Secret Love Nest,” “Disease Free,” “Drug Free,” and “Natural Breasts.”

In July 2014*, he seems to have started a second account that was linked to his home in Oxon Hill, Maryland, where he spent his time lobbying against causes like same-sex marriage. The birthday listed in the data for Duggar’s first account is February 3, 1988, one month off Duggar’s actual birthday of March 3, 1988. The birthday listed for the second account is March 2, 1988.

The two accounts overlap by a period of a few months. When he launched the second account, Duggar paid an initial fee of $250 that appears to have gone toward the purchase of an “affair guarantee”:

Customers who buy 1,000 credits for $250 receive a money-back “affair guarantee,” if they don’t have an affair within three months.

1393225516867551915.png
"


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wow. Just wow.

Not a big fan of data-hacks, but wow.

Once again, the oh so wholesome Duggar family, a bastion of Christian virtues.

I wonder how long it will take for his wife to divorce him now.

Anyone care to defend his behavior?
wait until the list of libtards come out....
 
..I suppose, so he could have double the amount of extra-marital affairs, in the name of Jesus, of course:

Family Values Activist Josh Duggar Had a Paid Ashley Madison Account

This information was just released.


Quote:

"...data released online in the wake of the hack on Ashley Madison’s servers certainly seems to show otherwise. Someone using a credit card belonging to a Joshua J. Duggar, with a billing address that matches the home in Fayetteville, Arkansas owned by his grandmother Mary—a home that was consistently shown on their now-cancelled TV show, and in which Anna Duggar gave birth to her first child—paid a total of $986.76 for two different monthly Ashley Madison subscriptions from February of 2013 until May of 2015.

1393225516779136939.png


According to the data, Josh Duggar was paying Ashley Madison in order to find an extramarital partner for the following acts:

“Conventional Sex,” Experimenting with Sex Toys,” One-Night Stands,” “Open to Experimentation,” “Gentleness,” “Good With Your Hands,” Sensual Massage,” “Extended Foreplay/Teasing,” “Bubble Bath for 2,” “Likes to Give Oral Sex,” “Likes to Receive Oral Sex,” “Someone I Can Teach,” “Someone Who Can Teach Me,” “Kissing,” “Cuddling & Hugging,” “Sharing Fantasies,” “Sex Talk.”

And here are the turn-ons that he offered up in service of finding a compatible person other than his wife with which to engage in those acts:

“A Professional/Well Groomed,” “Stylish/Classy,” “Casual Jeans/T-shirt Type,” “Muscular/Fit Body,” ”Petite Figure,” “Tall Height,” “Short Height,” “Long Hair,””Short Hair,” “Girl Next Door,” “Naughty Girl,” “Sense of Humor,” “Imagination,” “Creative and Adventurous,” “Relaxed and Easy Going,” “Aggressive/Take Charge Nature,” “Confidence,” “Discretion/Secrecy,” “A Good Listener,” “Good Personal Hygiene,” “Average Sex Drive,” “High Sex Drive,” “Dislikes Routine,” “Has a Secret Love Nest,” “Disease Free,” “Drug Free,” and “Natural Breasts.”

In July 2014*, he seems to have started a second account that was linked to his home in Oxon Hill, Maryland, where he spent his time lobbying against causes like same-sex marriage. The birthday listed in the data for Duggar’s first account is February 3, 1988, one month off Duggar’s actual birthday of March 3, 1988. The birthday listed for the second account is March 2, 1988.

The two accounts overlap by a period of a few months. When he launched the second account, Duggar paid an initial fee of $250 that appears to have gone toward the purchase of an “affair guarantee”:

Customers who buy 1,000 credits for $250 receive a money-back “affair guarantee,” if they don’t have an affair within three months.

1393225516867551915.png
"


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wow. Just wow.

Not a big fan of data-hacks, but wow.

Once again, the oh so wholesome Duggar family, a bastion of Christian virtues.

I wonder how long it will take for his wife to divorce him now.

Anyone care to defend his behavior?
wait until the list of libtards come out....

Do you see a difference between this happening to someone who has screamed about "family values" and someone who does not worry about the sexual activities of others?
 
Anyone care to defend his behavior?

Yes.

But first I am wondering if you would care to defend your own behavior here?

As I said yesterday in the religion thread on this --- St. John of the Cross spoke of man’s “predominant fault.” All of us have one where overcoming it is no easy matter. St. John says all predominant faults are rooted in one of three --- pride, vanity, or sensuality. Within those sins are numerous manifestations. Your target Josh is not so unusual, despite his confession of loving God and wanting to serve Him. The trials remain for all as long as we are alive. Such a fault can become a source of despair or of triumph. But only through humility, prayer, sacrifice and grace can it be overcome, and most often only after a great deal of time, effort, trial and failures. But even if one cannot overcome it entirely, God will not abandon the one who keeps asking, confessing and trying. It is those who do not care about their issues, or what God thinks, who concern me more.
 
Anyone care to defend his behavior?

Yes.

But first I am wondering if you would care to defend your own behavior here?

As I said yesterday in the religion thread on this --- St. John of the Cross spoke of man’s “predominant fault.” All of us have one where overcoming it is no easy matter. St. John says all predominant faults are rooted in one of three --- pride, vanity, or sensuality. Within those sins are numerous manifestations. Your target Josh is not so unusual, despite his confession of loving God and wanting to serve Him. The trials remain for all as long as we are alive. Such a fault can become a source of despair or of triumph. But only through humility, prayer, sacrifice and grace can it be overcome, and most often only after a great deal of time, effort, trial and failures. But even if one cannot overcome it entirely, God will not abandon the one who keeps asking, confessing and trying. It is those who do not care about their issues, or what God thinks, who concern me more.


Hey, dipshit, this thread is not about me. It's about a public figure who has claimed the moral high road, but who in reality is taking the lowest of all possible roads.

Are you smart enough to figure that out, dipshit?
 
why am I not surprised that rw SOCONS want people to do as they say & not as they do :eusa_whistle:
 
Anyone care to defend his behavior?

Yes.

But first I am wondering if you would care to defend your own behavior here?

As I said yesterday in the religion thread on this --- St. John of the Cross spoke of man’s “predominant fault.” All of us have one where overcoming it is no easy matter. St. John says all predominant faults are rooted in one of three --- pride, vanity, or sensuality. Within those sins are numerous manifestations. Your target Josh is not so unusual, despite his confession of loving God and wanting to serve Him. The trials remain for all as long as we are alive. Such a fault can become a source of despair or of triumph. But only through humility, prayer, sacrifice and grace can it be overcome, and most often only after a great deal of time, effort, trial and failures. But even if one cannot overcome it entirely, God will not abandon the one who keeps asking, confessing and trying. It is those who do not care about their issues, or what God thinks, who concern me more.


Hey, dipshit, this thread is not about me. It's about a public figure who has claimed the moral high road, but who in reality is taking the lowest of all possible roads.

Are you smart enough to figure that out, dipshit?

I did address your subject. But then I moved on.

I get it, though. When one resorts to name calling instead of addressing a simple question that usually means he is offended and cannot defend himself.

So sorry to have been that source.
 
Anyone care to defend his behavior?

Yes.

But first I am wondering if you would care to defend your own behavior here?

As I said yesterday in the religion thread on this --- St. John of the Cross spoke of man’s “predominant fault.” All of us have one where overcoming it is no easy matter. St. John says all predominant faults are rooted in one of three --- pride, vanity, or sensuality. Within those sins are numerous manifestations. Your target Josh is not so unusual, despite his confession of loving God and wanting to serve Him. The trials remain for all as long as we are alive. Such a fault can become a source of despair or of triumph. But only through humility, prayer, sacrifice and grace can it be overcome, and most often only after a great deal of time, effort, trial and failures. But even if one cannot overcome it entirely, God will not abandon the one who keeps asking, confessing and trying. It is those who do not care about their issues, or what God thinks, who concern me more.


Hey, dipshit, this thread is not about me. It's about a public figure who has claimed the moral high road, but who in reality is taking the lowest of all possible roads.

Are you smart enough to figure that out, dipshit?

I did address your subject. But then I moved on.

I get it, though. When one resorts to name calling instead of addressing a simple question that usually means he is offended and cannot defend himself.

So sorry to have been that source.


No. You tried to make the thread about me, asswipe. And I didn't let you do it.
There is nothing about my own behavior that I would need to defend. Are you smart enough to understand this?

Let me guess. You are a "Christian". They very often act this way. No honesty, no integrity, no personal responsibility and absolutely no backbone - the usual fare for so many "Christians".
 
Anyone care to defend his behavior?

Yes.

But first I am wondering if you would care to defend your own behavior here?

As I said yesterday in the religion thread on this --- St. John of the Cross spoke of man’s “predominant fault.” All of us have one where overcoming it is no easy matter. St. John says all predominant faults are rooted in one of three --- pride, vanity, or sensuality. Within those sins are numerous manifestations. Your target Josh is not so unusual, despite his confession of loving God and wanting to serve Him. The trials remain for all as long as we are alive. Such a fault can become a source of despair or of triumph. But only through humility, prayer, sacrifice and grace can it be overcome, and most often only after a great deal of time, effort, trial and failures. But even if one cannot overcome it entirely, God will not abandon the one who keeps asking, confessing and trying. It is those who do not care about their issues, or what God thinks, who concern me more.


Hey, dipshit, this thread is not about me. It's about a public figure who has claimed the moral high road, but who in reality is taking the lowest of all possible roads.

Are you smart enough to figure that out, dipshit?

I did address your subject. But then I moved on.

I get it, though. When one resorts to name calling instead of addressing a simple question that usually means he is offended and cannot defend himself.

So sorry to have been that source.


No. You tried to make the thread about me, asswipe. And I didn't let you do it.
There is nothing about my own behavior that I would need to defend. Are you smart enough to understand this?

Let me guess. You are a "Christian". They very often act this way. No honesty, no integrity, no personal responsibility and absolutely no backbone - the usual fare for so many "Christians".

You overreact.

And I feel bad. I may have been the last “Christian” type response you needed to break the camel’s back. Too bad because so much is at stake for all of us.

I just hope you do not stop from converting just to spite me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top