easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #281
Your deflection is obvious. You misdefine minority again. It is not just race.Where exactly did your interest in women suddenly happen in this post, and how does that detract from the point that the GOP is the party offering the greatest selection of 'racially diverse' candidates in 2016? Last I check 'woman' was not a 'race'.My last point, easyt, is absolutely correct: the Cuban vote in FL cannot swing the state. That you refuse to see the truth is your issue not mine.
Gosh, yes, I hope Kasich is on the ticket with Rubio: the GOP will take the state.
Women vote in larger numbers for the Dems than us: that is a fact. Any one who denies it is walking in la la land.
Women have always been a political minority, and the far right cannot redefine that without being laughed at.
No wonder the Boehners and McConnells laugh at you guys.
And I believe Boehner and McConnell would be laughing at you / whoever seemed to insinuate women were a 'race'.
Fact: Hispanics vote against the GOP.
Fact: Women vote against the GOP.
Fact: The GOP needs to reach out to them where they are at.
Since the issue is about RACIAL DIVERSITY and how the GOP in 2016 is offering the most racially diverse candidates, how does your response take away from that fact?
I am not the one avoiding the topic of 'racial diversity' regarding the parties' candidates being offered to the American people - the deflection is YOURS.