Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm nit confused one bit. As for the tutoring I gave you, you're welcome. Now try to stop embarrassing yourself/You obviously are confused about the difference in war and peace. Thank God you never inflicted your stupidity on anyone else as far as we know.
I got no idea what that means, but it hardly matters. You're a poor student.Deflection noted.
702, 706, 726, 738 all taught you something. If you don't recognize it, that's nobody's problem but yours.I must have missed the tutoring. Your posts are useful to educate people. They are called non-examples.
Why wait for them to get to the border? If you know they are coming here -- just send over a few F18's to kill them there....When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.
And the definition of invading
? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.
There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.
Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?
That's different....We, in the Army, don't hide. We fight foreign invaders and stop them.Go hide behind your wall!
So you have no issue with the Iraqis and Isis as the US invaded their boarder, nor the Afghanistan Taliban.
You're talking about bombing Mexico.Why wait for them to get to the border? If you know they are coming here -- just send over a few F18's to kill them there....When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.
And the definition of invading
? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.
There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.
Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?
As Bush famously and eloquently said -- we need to kill them over there before they kill us here...
Republicans should all campaign on pre-emptive strikes against immigrants.....even the legal ones, how do we know they aren't evil too
They came from Honduras originally -- they also come from Guatemala -- all of the places our Monroe doctrine referred to --- As James Monroe said in his wisdom, every country in Central and South America is ours to do what we want with.....so why not bomb mexico and any other country that doesn't have significant white populations...You're talking about bombing Mexico.Why wait for them to get to the border? If you know they are coming here -- just send over a few F18's to kill them there....When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.
And the definition of invading
? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.
There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.
Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?
As Bush famously and eloquently said -- we need to kill them over there before they kill us here...
Republicans should all campaign on pre-emptive strikes against immigrants.....even the legal ones, how do we know they aren't evil too
Its best to murder a few thousand of them so they know that we mean business -- they will never try to cross again.....No one wants our military or guard or border patrol to fire shots into Mexico. There is already one pathetic case of this at least and the border agent is in mucho trouble for killing a Mexican youth on that side. Best to declare a DAY of ALL PORTS of entry CLOSED. Best to throw up some temporary fence on unfenced and unwalled areas. Best to create noise and smell. Best to get rid of desert water tanks. Best to look like an army that can scare the people by presence.
No one wants our military or guard or border patrol to fire shots into Mexico. There is already one pathetic case of this at least and the border agent is in mucho trouble for killing a Mexican youth on that side. Best to declare a DAY of ALL PORTS of entry CLOSED. Best to throw up some temporary fence on unfenced and unwalled areas. Best to create noise and smell. Best to get rid of desert water tanks. Best to look like an army that can scare the people by presence.Use whatever non-lethal force is necessary to prevent their entry or to capture and contain them until they can be deported. But you can't start shooting them.
”Its best to murder a few thousand of them...”Its best to murder a few thousand of them so they know that we mean business -- they will never try to cross again.....No one wants our military or guard or border patrol to fire shots into Mexico. There is already one pathetic case of this at least and the border agent is in mucho trouble for killing a Mexican youth on that side. Best to declare a DAY of ALL PORTS of entry CLOSED. Best to throw up some temporary fence on unfenced and unwalled areas. Best to create noise and smell. Best to get rid of desert water tanks. Best to look like an army that can scare the people by presence.
And peace and tranquility will once again come back to this country -- well, as soon as we do something about all of the other undesirables already here...but give it time, we got something planned for them too
I got no idea what that means, but it hardly matters. You're a poor student.Deflection noted.
No he isn't.You're just a fucked up, arrogant, right wing asshole!These people aren't thinking about "safe to go home to", and it's amazing that with all that has been said this far into the thread, that you don't know that. The caravan is >>
1. A Democrat set-up, to boost Democrat votes in the 2018 elections, and a last gasp attempt to win back the US Congress. I just wonder how much these people are getting paid.
2. An attempt by caravaners to escape from their lousy economies, and grab for all the hand-out goodies the Democrats flash at them.
3. If the caravaers were running away from unsafe crime conditions, they would go to countries that are closer to them then the US, have lower crime rates, and don't present a language obstacle. Just one problem. Those countries don't offer the economic opportunities (hand-outs) that the USA does (ex. Cuba, Aruba, Martinique)
How about riding them down with mounted agents? Herd them like the cattle they so love to emulate...No, dumbass. You can't start shooting unarmed civilians at the border. That would be seen as a war crime.
The goddamn leftists in this country would love love love to see some poor Honduran woman and her baby shot to death at the border.
Use whatever non-lethal force is necessary to prevent their entry or to capture and contain them until they can be deported. But you can't start shooting them.
I haven't seen anything encouraging shooting them while they still occupy Mexico. Shoot them when they set foot on our soil.No one wants our military or guard or border patrol to fire shots into Mexico. There is already one pathetic case of this at least and the border agent is in mucho trouble for killing a Mexican youth on that side. Best to declare a DAY of ALL PORTS of entry CLOSED. Best to throw up some temporary fence on unfenced and unwalled areas. Best to create noise and smell. Best to get rid of desert water tanks. Best to look like an army that can scare the people by presence.Use whatever non-lethal force is necessary to prevent their entry or to capture and contain them until they can be deported. But you can't start shooting them.
Not like we haven't done it before.You're talking about bombing Mexico.Why wait for them to get to the border? If you know they are coming here -- just send over a few F18's to kill them there....When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.
And the definition of invading
? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.
There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.
Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?
As Bush famously and eloquently said -- we need to kill them over there before they kill us here...
Republicans should all campaign on pre-emptive strikes against immigrants.....even the legal ones, how do we know they aren't evil too
