Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
like obammy?Sure, why not, It's not like he risked anything to give the order.
so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
His talks and actions up to and thru the raid helped fool the terrorists.Please explain your answer.
how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
poofy cheesypuff.how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
you should put them down, it's too early for bad food.poofy cheesypuff.how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
well quote him saying that. come on big man prove your balls.Imo it's not really a matter of balls, except Trumpy would have to claim he had bigger balls than Lincoln. And I didn't mean to imply that Obama's for policy was much better than Trump's. Actually Trump's Syria Run Away is sorta similar. But for different reasons.
Still Trump was willing to bet his second term. I finally can say something positive about him. LOL
how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.Just like Obama, the US Military took care of business.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?But I gave Obama credit for being willing to risk his second term on taking the chance. Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that. But that doesn't make his Syria run away the right thing to do, and it actually illustrates why it's the wrong thing to do.
I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
South Park bigger.
As Bendog aptly explained "Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that."
how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?I agree, the Pakistan incursion took more balls.
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
South Park bigger.
As Bendog aptly explained "Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that."
I asked how it was? It seems you were there and experienced the two and can make that statement. the fact you made the statement makes you the fool. but hey, can't give credit to the military for their risks. go tell their families that they didn't incur the same risks. go ahead. your statement I spit on. fk you
That's the public schedule. It really was never going to say "The president is going to be in the situation room watching a top secret mission go down".Staged, like everything in this pathetic weakling’s life.
View attachment 286566
That’s why all the wires are disconnected. It was staged later.
A flawless operation. Trump approved the operation.
Yeah, Trump gets some credit, but the military gets 99% of the credit.
how much bigger? what was different? explain it. why is one risk more than another?so those who took action here didn't have any balls? hmmmmmm wow, why weren't you in there then?
How about bigger balls? Would that suit you better?
you must feel inferior all the time then.
South Park bigger.
As Bendog aptly explained "Going into Pakistan was a lot more dicey than going "back" into Syria, because Pakistan could have gone full out terrorist haven without our ability to do anything about it, and they really do have nukes, so the comparison is not exact because Obama risked a lot more. But if the Syria raid went balls up, Trump would surely have been a one termer. I think we have to give him credit for that."
I asked how it was? It seems you were there and experienced the two and can make that statement. the fact you made the statement makes you the fool. but hey, can't give credit to the military for their risks. go tell their families that they didn't incur the same risks. go ahead. your statement I spit on. fk you
Bad weekend fleabag? Political ramifications.
I throw poopoo on your shoes..............
you seem to find pleasure on downgrading our military families.
