should Ray Epps be arrested ?

He had his cover blown the next day.. it’s why we need the thousands of hours of video

And by 'cover blown', you mean you just made up shit him, backed by nothing?

Remember...your only source that Epps was working for the FBI is you quoting yourself.

And you don't know shit about any of this.
 
How is inciting a so-called insurrection? Umm idk I’m not the one putting 70 year-old women with cancer in jail for the charge of parading

Yeah, it sucks that she was incarcerated. That judge should have just given her probation.
 
You've seen the video of this guy with a booming voice stand in the middle of a crowd and yell "TOMORROW WE ENTER THE CAPITOL!!!!" Yes that is inciting a riot.

LOL

Exactly how is that inciting a riot, but Trump telling his cult to fight like hell to stop the steal, isn't?
 
And by 'cover blown', you mean you just made up shit him, backed by nothing?

Remember...your only source that Epps was working for the FBI is you quoting yourself.

And you don't know shit about any of this.
We know he’s fbi HE WASNT ARRESTED,, after telling hundreds to enter the capital for two days.
 
LOL. Read the definition of incitement. There are no time conditions you are just making stuff up. What Ray Epps did was definitely incitement and the bigger question is Was he working for the Feds or was he just a "Concerned Citizen" who decided to fly all the way from Arizona to incite the riot?
Dude, you KNOW that the Supreme Court has set a very, very high bar for incitement of violence in Brandenburg v. Ohio that placed among its 1st requirements the speech that violates this standard is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action".

As you KNOW, its the imminent part of the Bradenburg test that your claims against Epps laughably and completely fail. As a full night's sleep between his statements on January 5th and the violence on January 6th demonstrate elegantly.

And yet despite knowing about Brandenburg V. Ohio, knowing about the Brandenburg Test, knowing the requirement for imminent lawlessness, you try to pretend that none of it exists, praying we didn't know about any of it.

How's that working out for you?

The prosecutors in question know that Epps' call to enter the capitol on January 5th utterly fails the Brandenberg test. Which is why they couldn't charge him. Especially when he didn't call for any violence. Nor commit or advocate any violence on January 6th.
 
Once again, you prove you don't know what's in the Constitution. In accordance with the Constitution, Congress counts electoral votes, not dirt.
We don’t have geographical elections we have people elections. Try again commie
 
We know he’s fbi HE WASNT ARRESTED,, after telling hundreds to enter the capital for two days.

And by 'know', you mean assume. As you've made up your entire conspiracy about Epps being FBI....pulling it sideways out of your own ass.

What crime could be charged with? He didn't enter the capitol, he didn't break police lines, he didn't assault any cop.....and he actively tried to talk a young man out of attacking the police.

Yet you know better, huh?
 
And by 'know', you mean assume. As you've made up your entire conspiracy about Epps being FBI....pulling it sideways out of your own ass.

What crime could be charged with? He didn't enter the capitol, he didn't break police lines, he didn't assault any cop.....and he actively tried to talk a young man out of attacking the police.

Yet you know better, huh?
Release all the video
 
So you're admitting that you don't *actually* have evidence that Epps commited any crime.
I don’t think any crimes are committed on 1/6 .. what is you’re going to arrest people for being 70 years old with cancer and walking through the capital,, then yes he should be arrested
 
We don’t have geographical elections we have people elections. Try again commie

The states assign electors per the constitution.

Your bizarro 'any random asshole can assign himself as an elector' theory has nothing to do with the constitution. its completely outside our system of governance.
 
The states assign electors per the constitution.

Your bizarro 'any random asshole can assign himself as an elector' theory has nothing to do with the constitution. its completely outside our system of governance.
Every state has sets of electors
 
I don’t think any crimes are committed on 1/6 .. what is you’re going to arrest people for being 70 years old with cancer and walking through the capital,, then yes he should be arrested

So who are you quoting as Epps being FBI?

So far its you, citing a conspiracy that you pulled out of your ass.....backed by nothing.

And contradicting you is Epps. With Samsel affirming that Epps tried to PREVENT violence against police.

Why would I ignore them....and believe your imagination? Remember....you don't actually know anything or anyone involved.
 
So who are you quoting as Epps being FBI?

So far its you, citing a conspiracy that you pulled out of your ass.....backed by nothing.

And contradicting you is Epps. With Samsel affirming that Epps tried to PREVENT violence against police.

Why would I ignore them....and believe your imagination? Remember....you don't actually know anything or anyone involved.
Epps is fbi. Deal with it
 
These electors are assigned by the states per the constitution. They don't assign themselves.

You simply don't have the first clue how the constitution works.
How many ppl entered the capital because ray epps told them to?
 
By state, not by counties. Seriously, try reading the Constitution sometime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top