Should The Rich Be Required To Pay Higher Taxes In the US?

[bripat9643]

Yet, the Right usually Only complains when bailing out the least wealthy with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Why should those who don't want to work, be rewarded? Go back to the 1800's, if you didn't work, you starved. So more people worked, but thanks to FDR, with a chicken in every pot, and pot in every libs hand, America is slowing killing itself, which has been the plan of the liberals. If it wasn't for the 2nd amendment, this country would be totally Communist and the "WORKERS" would be FORCED to work at the point of the gun, just like it was in the old USSR. Shame dipshit liberals are too dumb to study history, so America has to repeat it.

ok yeah agreed.

Yet, the Right usually Only complains when bailing out the least wealthy with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Bullshit. We complain about bailing anyone out. The right complained the loudest about Bush's TARP boondoggle. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it.

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

 

[bripat9643]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

 

[Dad2three]

This eat the rich shit is stupid and ignorant. ... hey idiots who is gonna employ your stupid asses once the rich no long have money?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Without false premises, distortions and lies, what would the right wing EVER have?


2/3RDS OF US economy is consumer driven, more hands in the bottom 90% of US, THE Larger the economy!


BUT LET'S JUST GO BACK TO THE GOOD OLD CALVINIST BS WHERE AT LEAST WE "WORK", LOL

You idiot they don't have unlimited money

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

EFFECTIVE TAX RATES

income shares

THOSE POOR BABY'S...

 

[Dad2three]

Why should those who don't want to work, be rewarded? Go back to the 1800's, if you didn't work, you starved. So more people worked, but thanks to FDR, with a chicken in every pot, and pot in every libs hand, America is slowing killing itself, which has been the plan of the liberals. If it wasn't for the 2nd amendment, this country would be totally Communist and the "WORKERS" would be FORCED to work at the point of the gun, just like it was in the old USSR. Shame dipshit liberals are too dumb to study history, so America has to repeat it.

ok yeah agreed.

Yet, the Right usually Only complains when bailing out the least wealthy with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Bullshit. We complain about bailing anyone out. The right complained the loudest about Bush's TARP boondoggle. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it.

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

 

[bripat9643]

ok yeah agreed.

Yet, the Right usually Only complains when bailing out the least wealthy with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Bullshit. We complain about bailing anyone out. The right complained the loudest about Bush's TARP boondoggle. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it.

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

 

[Dad2three]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

Oh right, Sorry I thought there were MANY examples of economic freedom in the 3rd world Bubs. India doesn't have it?

PLEASE however, give me ONE example of the Randian fetish to EVER be used successfully? EVER?

 

[bripat9643]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

Oh right, Sorry I thought there were MANY examples of economic freedom in the 3rd world Bubs. India doesn't have it?

Nope. For many years India wallowed in socialism and bureaucracy. It has recently liberalized its economic policies to some degree. Hence the boom in their economy.

PLEASE however, give me ONE example of the Randian fetish to EVER be used successfully? EVER?

Every Western country in the world until the First World War.

 

[Dad2three]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

WHICH ONE YOU WANT THE US TO LOOK LIKE BUBBA?


Index of Economic Freedom

7 Chile
22 Georgia
24 Czech Republic
10 Mauritius
25 United Arab Emirates
28 Colombia
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
32 Qatar
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
34 Macau
36 Botswana
37 Latvia
65 Rwanda
38 Jordan
66 Montenegro
39 Brunei Darussalam
67 Trinidad and Tobago

68 Panama
69 Kazakhstan
70 Turkey
43 Uruguay
71 Ghana
44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72 South Africa
46 Barbados
74 Kuwait
47 Peru
75 Thailand
48 Jamaica
76 Philippines
77 Saudi Arabia
50 Slovakia
79 Madagascar
52 Armenia
53 Macedonia
81 Croatia
54 Hungary
82 Kyrgyz Republic
55 Bulgaria
83 Paraguay
56 Oman
84 Vanuatu
57 Romania
85 Azerbaijan
58 Malta
59 Mexico
87 Guatemala
60 Cabo Verde
62 El Salvador
90 Serbia
63 Albania

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

 

[Dad2three]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

Oh right, Sorry I thought there were MANY examples of economic freedom in the 3rd world Bubs. India doesn't have it?

Nope. For many years India wallowed in socialism and bureaucracy. It has recently liberalized its economic policies to some degree. Hence the boom in their economy.

PLEASE however, give me ONE example of the Randian fetish to EVER be used successfully? EVER?

Every Western country in the world until the First World War.

Socialism? lol

Sorry Bubba, let me be MORE specific, GIVE ME ONE GAWDDAM NATION OR STATE YOU WANT TO CLAIM USED THAT RANDIAN BS!

 

[Dad2three]

Yet, the Right usually Only complains when bailing out the least wealthy with the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Bullshit. We complain about bailing anyone out. The right complained the loudest about Bush's TARP boondoggle. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it.

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

Fuk no, BUT I also support GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS ON THE BEAT TO STOP WHAT HAPPENED UNDER HARDING/COOLIDGE, RONNIE AND DUBYA!

 

[bripat9643]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

WHICH ONE YOU WANT THE US TO LOOK LIKE BUBBA?


Index of Economic Freedom

7 Chile
22 Georgia
24 Czech Republic
10 Mauritius
25 United Arab Emirates
28 Colombia
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
32 Qatar
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
34 Macau
36 Botswana
37 Latvia
65 Rwanda
38 Jordan
66 Montenegro
39 Brunei Darussalam
67 Trinidad and Tobago

68 Panama
69 Kazakhstan
70 Turkey
43 Uruguay
71 Ghana
44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72 South Africa
46 Barbados
74 Kuwait
47 Peru
75 Thailand
48 Jamaica
76 Philippines
77 Saudi Arabia
50 Slovakia
79 Madagascar
52 Armenia
53 Macedonia
81 Croatia
54 Hungary
82 Kyrgyz Republic
55 Bulgaria
83 Paraguay
56 Oman
84 Vanuatu
57 Romania
85 Azerbaijan
58 Malta
59 Mexico
87 Guatemala
60 Cabo Verde
62 El Salvador
90 Serbia
63 Albania

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

it's curious that you were afraid to include all the top countries on the list, don't you think? BTW, before the Obama administration, the USA was ranked #4 on this list.

1 Hong Kong
2 Singapore
3 New Zealand
4 Australia
5 Switzerland
6 Canada
7 Chile
8 Estonia
9 Ireland
10 Mauritius
11 Denmark
12 United States
13 United Kingdom
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
16 Germany
17 The Netherlands
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
20 Japan
21 Luxembourg

 

[bripat9643]

Bullshit. We complain about bailing anyone out. The right complained the loudest about Bush's TARP boondoggle. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it.

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

Fuk no, BUT I also support GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS ON THE BEAT TO STOP WHAT HAPPENED UNDER HARDING/COOLIDGE, RONNIE AND DUBYA!

The phrase "GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS" is any oxymoron.

 

[bripat9643]

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

Oh right, Sorry I thought there were MANY examples of economic freedom in the 3rd world Bubs. India doesn't have it?

Nope. For many years India wallowed in socialism and bureaucracy. It has recently liberalized its economic policies to some degree. Hence the boom in their economy.

PLEASE however, give me ONE example of the Randian fetish to EVER be used successfully? EVER?

Every Western country in the world until the First World War.

Socialism? lol

Sorry Bubba, let me be MORE specific, GIVE ME ONE GAWDDAM NATION OR STATE YOU WANT TO CLAIM USED THAT RANDIAN BS!

The USA, numskull.

 

[Dad2three]

Worked before

One thing we do know is that Supply Side Economics has been a failure

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

WHICH ONE YOU WANT THE US TO LOOK LIKE BUBBA?


Index of Economic Freedom

7 Chile
22 Georgia
24 Czech Republic
10 Mauritius
25 United Arab Emirates
28 Colombia
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
32 Qatar
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
34 Macau
36 Botswana
37 Latvia
65 Rwanda
38 Jordan
66 Montenegro
39 Brunei Darussalam
67 Trinidad and Tobago

68 Panama
69 Kazakhstan
70 Turkey
43 Uruguay
71 Ghana
44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72 South Africa
46 Barbados
74 Kuwait
47 Peru
75 Thailand
48 Jamaica
76 Philippines
77 Saudi Arabia
50 Slovakia
79 Madagascar
52 Armenia
53 Macedonia
81 Croatia
54 Hungary
82 Kyrgyz Republic
55 Bulgaria
83 Paraguay
56 Oman
84 Vanuatu
57 Romania
85 Azerbaijan
58 Malta
59 Mexico
87 Guatemala
60 Cabo Verde
62 El Salvador
90 Serbia
63 Albania

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

it's curious that you were afraid to include all the top countries on the list, don't you think? BTW, before the Obama administration, the USA was ranked #4 on this list.

1 Hong Kong
2 Singapore
3 New Zealand
4 Australia
5 Switzerland
6 Canada
7 Chile
8 Estonia
9 Ireland
10 Mauritius
11 Denmark
12 United States
13 United Kingdom
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
16 Germany
17 The Netherlands
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
20 Japan
21 Luxembourg

Before Obama right wing H/F had US at #4? Doubtful LINKIE?

So you don't want to provide one of those nations I gave you want to emulate Bubs?

 

[Dad2three]

Yep, the Dems care more about saving US than the ideological right wingers who CREATED the mess that needed a bailout, just like Ronnie's S&L bailout and Harding/Coolidge's great depression

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

Fuk no, BUT I also support GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS ON THE BEAT TO STOP WHAT HAPPENED UNDER HARDING/COOLIDGE, RONNIE AND DUBYA!

The phrase "GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS" is any oxymoron.

It is when the GOP's in charge alright

 

[bripat9643]

Are things better now? Nope.

Why not people have their economic freedom then?

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

WHICH ONE YOU WANT THE US TO LOOK LIKE BUBBA?


Index of Economic Freedom

7 Chile
22 Georgia
24 Czech Republic
10 Mauritius
25 United Arab Emirates
28 Colombia
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
32 Qatar
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
34 Macau
36 Botswana
37 Latvia
65 Rwanda
38 Jordan
66 Montenegro
39 Brunei Darussalam
67 Trinidad and Tobago

68 Panama
69 Kazakhstan
70 Turkey
43 Uruguay
71 Ghana
44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72 South Africa
46 Barbados
74 Kuwait
47 Peru
75 Thailand
48 Jamaica
76 Philippines
77 Saudi Arabia
50 Slovakia
79 Madagascar
52 Armenia
53 Macedonia
81 Croatia
54 Hungary
82 Kyrgyz Republic
55 Bulgaria
83 Paraguay
56 Oman
84 Vanuatu
57 Romania
85 Azerbaijan
58 Malta
59 Mexico
87 Guatemala
60 Cabo Verde
62 El Salvador
90 Serbia
63 Albania

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

it's curious that you were afraid to include all the top countries on the list, don't you think? BTW, before the Obama administration, the USA was ranked #4 on this list.

1 Hong Kong
2 Singapore
3 New Zealand
4 Australia
5 Switzerland
6 Canada
7 Chile
8 Estonia
9 Ireland
10 Mauritius
11 Denmark
12 United States
13 United Kingdom
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
16 Germany
17 The Netherlands
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
20 Japan
21 Luxembourg

Before Obama right wing H/F had US at #4? Doubtful LINKIE?

So you don't want to provide one of those nations I gave you want to emulate Bubs?

I wouldn't mind it if we emulated Chile, but the other countries are far down the list of economic freedom. I would prefer Chile under Pinochet to American under Obama.

 

[bripat9643]

Your Komrade was just whining about the government bailing out the wealthy, and here you are endorsing the practice. You liberal turds can't decide whether you are coming or going.

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

Fuk no, BUT I also support GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS ON THE BEAT TO STOP WHAT HAPPENED UNDER HARDING/COOLIDGE, RONNIE AND DUBYA!

The phrase "GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS" is any oxymoron.

It is when the GOP's in charge alright

It's always an oxymoron. Even more so when Democrats are in charge.

 

[Dad2three]

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

Oh right, Sorry I thought there were MANY examples of economic freedom in the 3rd world Bubs. India doesn't have it?

Nope. For many years India wallowed in socialism and bureaucracy. It has recently liberalized its economic policies to some degree. Hence the boom in their economy.

PLEASE however, give me ONE example of the Randian fetish to EVER be used successfully? EVER?

Every Western country in the world until the First World War.

Socialism? lol

Sorry Bubba, let me be MORE specific, GIVE ME ONE GAWDDAM NATION OR STATE YOU WANT TO CLAIM USED THAT RANDIAN BS!

The USA, numskull.

SURE BUBS, SURE


(Re-)Introducing: The American School of Economics


When the United States became independent from Britain it also rebelled against the British System of economics, characterized by Adam Smith, in favor of the American School based on protectionism and infrastructure and prospered under this system for almost 200 years to become the wealthiest nation in the world. Unrestrained free trade resurfaced in the early 1900s culminating in the Great Depression and again in the 1970s culminating in the current Economic Meltdown.


Closely related to mercantilism, it can be seen as contrary to classical economics. It consisted of these three core policies:

1. protecting industry through selective high tariffs (especially 1861–1932) and through subsidies (especially 1932–70)
2. government investments in infrastructure creating targeted internal improvements (especially in transportation)
3. a national bank with policies that promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation

It is a capitalist economic school based on the Hamiltonian economic program. The American School of capitalism was intended to allow the United States to become economically independent and nationally self-sufficient.



Frank Bourgin's 1989 study of the Constitutional Convention shows that direct government involvement in the economy was intended by the Founders.


The goal, most forcefully articulated by Hamilton, was to ensure that dearly won political independence was not lost by being economically and financially dependent on the powers and princes of Europe. The creation of a strong central government able to promote science, invention, industry and commerce, was seen as an essential means of promoting the general welfare and making the economy of the United States strong enough for them to determine their own destiny.

American School (economics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WANT TO TRY AGAIN BUBBA?

 

[Dad2three]

Economic freedom? Oh you want US to look like the 3rd world nations your policy would turn US back into?

Third world nations have never had economic freedom, dipstick. That's why they are third world.

WHICH ONE YOU WANT THE US TO LOOK LIKE BUBBA?


Index of Economic Freedom

7 Chile
22 Georgia
24 Czech Republic
10 Mauritius
25 United Arab Emirates
28 Colombia
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
32 Qatar
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
34 Macau
36 Botswana
37 Latvia
65 Rwanda
38 Jordan
66 Montenegro
39 Brunei Darussalam
67 Trinidad and Tobago

68 Panama
69 Kazakhstan
70 Turkey
43 Uruguay
71 Ghana
44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
72 South Africa
46 Barbados
74 Kuwait
47 Peru
75 Thailand
48 Jamaica
76 Philippines
77 Saudi Arabia
50 Slovakia
79 Madagascar
52 Armenia
53 Macedonia
81 Croatia
54 Hungary
82 Kyrgyz Republic
55 Bulgaria
83 Paraguay
56 Oman
84 Vanuatu
57 Romania
85 Azerbaijan
58 Malta
59 Mexico
87 Guatemala
60 Cabo Verde
62 El Salvador
90 Serbia
63 Albania

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

it's curious that you were afraid to include all the top countries on the list, don't you think? BTW, before the Obama administration, the USA was ranked #4 on this list.

1 Hong Kong
2 Singapore
3 New Zealand
4 Australia
5 Switzerland
6 Canada
7 Chile
8 Estonia
9 Ireland
10 Mauritius
11 Denmark
12 United States
13 United Kingdom
14 Taiwan
15 Lithuania
16 Germany
17 The Netherlands
18 Bahrain
19 Finland
20 Japan
21 Luxembourg

Before Obama right wing H/F had US at #4? Doubtful LINKIE?

So you don't want to provide one of those nations I gave you want to emulate Bubs?

I wouldn't mind it if we emulated Chile, but the other countries are far down the list of economic freedom. I would prefer Chile under Pinochet to American under Obama.

Good, Uncle Milties lab test


CHILE: THE LABORATORY TEST

Many people have often wondered what it would be like to create a nation based solely on their political and economic beliefs. Imagine: no opposition, no political rivals, no compromise of morals. Only a "benevolent dictator," if you will, setting up society according to your ideals.

The Chicago School of Economics got that chance for 16 years in Chile, under near-laboratory conditions. Between 1973 and 1989, a government team of economists trained at the University of Chicago dismantled or decentralized the Chilean state as far as was humanly possible. Their program included privatizing welfare and social programs, deregulating the market, liberalizing trade, rolling back trade unions, and rewriting its constitution and laws. And they did all this in the absence of the far-right's most hated institution: democracy.

The results were exactly what liberals predicted

Chile's economy became more unstable than any other in Latin America, alternately experiencing deep plunges and soaring growth. Once all this erratic behavior was averaged out, however, Chile's growth during this 16-year period was one of the slowest of any Latin American country. Worse, income inequality grew severe. The majority of workers actually earned less in 1989 than in 1973 (after adjusting for inflation), while the incomes of the rich skyrocketed. In the absence of market regulations, Chile also became one of the most polluted countries in Latin America. And Chile's lack of democracy was only possible by suppressing political opposition and labor unions under a reign of terror and widespread human rights abuses.

Conservatives have developed an apologist literature defending Chile as a huge success story....



Chile: the laboratory test


WANT TO TRY AGAIN BUBS?

 

[Dad2three]

Endorsing it Bubs? Oh you mean to stop the consequences of CONservative/GOP policies like 1929?

Do you support government bailouts of the wealthy or not?

Fuk no, BUT I also support GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS ON THE BEAT TO STOP WHAT HAPPENED UNDER HARDING/COOLIDGE, RONNIE AND DUBYA!

The phrase "GOOD GOV'T REGULATION AND REGULATORS" is any oxymoron.

It is when the GOP's in charge alright

It's always an oxymoron. Even more so when Democrats are in charge.

Name the banking collapse under a Dem Prez Bubs? Oops