Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,900
- 1,530
It is what it is.Yeah that makes it okay.
for the next 18 years or so all I will be paying are capital gains taxes until I start pulling from my qualified retirement accounts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is what it is.Yeah that makes it okay.
They designed the tax code to benefit themselves, and your cool with it.It is what it is.
for the next 18 years or so all I will be paying are capital gains taxes until I start pulling from my qualified retirement accounts.
They designed the tax code to benefit themselves, and your cool with it.
It’s still incomeThen why are the called capital gains taxes and not income taxes? Usually when referring to income people think W2 income
Sure lolCapital gains taxes benefit everyone because everyone has the ability to invest in capital assets
Lol. Everyone?Capital gains taxes benefit everyone because everyone has the ability to invest in capital assets
Please read the Propublica series I linked above. Are you aware many billionaires have paid zero to almost nothing in income taxes for many years? If you think this is just fine, you’re crazy.Capital gains taxes benefit everyone because everyone has the ability to invest in capital assets
As I clearly stated, the billionaires pay little in income tax. We’ve been down this road before my poor deluded conboy. I can always count on you coming to the defense of the ultra wealthy.
Does it matter? You’re much too confused and uninformed.If you can't answer the question just respond with "I don't know." It would save you a little bit of typing.
It is what it is.
for the next 18 years or so all I will be paying are capital gains taxes until I start pulling from my qualified retirement accounts.
Does it matter? You’re much too confused and uninformed.
Lol. Forther proof you know nothing.You're probably wasting your time. These people hear about one or two stories of billionaires that have a lot of write-offs and think all billionaires do as well. The MSM knows how to sell papers and get them to their internet sites.
No the age should not be extended. If anything the age should be lowered to allow for a healthy and long term "earned retirement"... Say, 60 years old: it will open up a lot more jobs for those who need it and this country's abilities to manage increasing amounts of money into SS and Medicare will ensure a strong foundation for "The American Dream of Retirement"; something that we all deserve after a lifetime of work into the US GDP.SS and MC were started in 1934 and 1965 respectfully. In 1934 job were much more physical and people’s bodies broke down starting in their 50s. Nowadays go to any company and you see people working well into their 70s… heck even construction are less strenuous on the person’s body. The trend is only going to increase. In addition, medicine is getting better and people are living longer. This reality should be recognized.
In addition it is much easier to take care of oneself and eat better and feel better at older ages.
Our safety nets need to reflect this new reality.
No the age should not be extended. If anything the age should be lowered to allow for a healthy and long term "earned retirement"... Say, 60 years old: it will open up a lot more jobs for those who need it and this country's abilities to manage increasing amounts of money into SS and Medicare will ensure a strong foundation for "The American Dream of Retirement"; something that we all deserve after a lifetime of work into the US GDP.
No we’re not Dick lick.That sounds nice and all but we're running out of money now with the current retirement age at 66 or 67.
I don't think we're running out of money as much as wages have dropped so contributions are down... You get what you put in; for instance if you are an immigrant and only work ten years until retirement, that's all you get. Same for people who don't work very much in a career: they may never be able to retire, but for those of us who have put in 50 years or more - THAT is the 60 year limit that would benefit those retirees.That sounds nice and all but we're running out of money now with the current retirement age at 66 or 67.
No we’re not Dick lick.
If our criminal government run by dumb cons like you would stop wasting money on the war machine, CIA, and corporate welfare with huge tax breaks for the ultra rich, all would be just fine.
Answer me this doofus, why do cons always want to cut benefits to the American people, but never benefits given the war profiteers and CIA?
I don't think we're running out of money as much as wages have dropped so contributions are down... You get what you put in; for instance if you are an immigrant and only work ten years until retirement, that's all you get. Same for people who don't work very much in a career: they may never be able to retire, but for those of us who have put in 50 years or more - THAT is the 60 year limit that would benefit those retirees.
I know what some say about money, but I never believe what critics of SS say about anything.
So the system works really well then huh...Between SS and Medicare, do you think he put that much in to be taken care of for nearly 30 years of his life? I know he didn't in spite of him making a pretty good buck as a bricklayer.
Sure all would be fine with you. You don't pay anything. Send the bill to the rich guy, that's they way it's done in commie town.
Military spending is one of the few things we spend money on that's actually in the constitution. Everything else is wasteful spending or vote buying.
Just a fair warning, if you're a dumb kid that can't converse without personal insults, please don't respond to my posts. I prefer to have intelligent discussions with adults only. Thank you.