Should The USA Leave The United Nations?

Yes it most certainly does

It was fear of nukes and only fear of them which prevented the soviet conquest of western europe especially in the seventies.

Countreies casn negotiate anywhere. Negotiations only work sometimes.

The Un is no good and accomplishes nothing.
Has nukes prevent war for
Israel?
Pakistan?
India?
Ukr v Russia
Vietnam v China

No?
Again, your premist collapses.
 
It was more NATO and the Western Allies than the use of nukes which was and still is MAD.
Wrong.

No one used nukes which si the point.

Their existence prevented the USSR from making their move, In ther seventies NATO was a hollow shell with no prayer of stopping the soviets without nukes,

They could not take risk that NATO would resort to nukes.
 
Has nukes prevent war for
Israel?
Pakistan?
India?
Ukr v Russia
Vietnam v China

No?
Again, your premist collapses.
You do not even address my premise.

I never said nukes prevented war you dumbass.

I said they prevented the escelation of wars and kept them geographically localized.

My premise is rock solid and defeats you,

You are really a dumb person
 
Your premise: No world war because of nukes.
Nations with nukes have fought wars (including the US) lost wars (including the US) but no nukes.
THEREFORE, and I doubt your tiny brain can comprehend this...

Fear of nukes doesn't prevent wars of any kind.

NEGOTIATING prevents wars and the UN is where countries can negotiate.

So put your dick back in your pants and accept that the US is part of the UN because supporting the UN is good for the US, not because the UN serves any other purpose.

That the US doesn't always get its way at the UN is no reason to act like a 4 year old throwing a tantrum because Thomas is over.
You are right...

They are children, US has the largest say in the UN but the children are only used to getting there own way..
 

Forum List

Back
Top