SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
Is it true or not? | Eija-Riitta Korhola
So now your precious Finnish scientists are confirming what myself and other skeptics on this board have been pointing out to you recently. Does this alter your position or do you now view even Finnish scientists as corrupt? Maybe big oil has bought the University of Oslo.
The truth is that they still havent. During this millennium the global average temperature has been rather stubborn and not in line with predictions. Even if emissions have increased radically, a correlation with rising temperatures just cannot be traced. This issue also features in the upcoming, leaked, IPCC report. Even though public statements attempted to mask the damage done by the leak, everyone has been able to draw their own conclusions based on a graph in the report: temperatures stagnate even though the predictions point upwards. The temperatures simply do not obey.
Unless we make them obey. A University of Oslo professor, Ole Humlum, recently remarked an odd phenomenon and revealed the newest climate scandal. Apparently, since 2008 some research institutions have been retrospectively correcting their global temperature graphs. Usually, this would not be strange at all, as scientific information tends to be built up piece-by-piece and may have to be rectified at a later stage. It is, however, extremely strange that data from 1915 has also been touched-up. Temperature data from the beginning of the 20th century has been systematically rounded down, while later data has been rounded up respectively. Data seems to have been forced to obey the greenhouse theory, and suddenly it seems like the graphs confirm the desired hypotheses.
So now your precious Finnish scientists are confirming what myself and other skeptics on this board have been pointing out to you recently. Does this alter your position or do you now view even Finnish scientists as corrupt? Maybe big oil has bought the University of Oslo.