Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last time I checked, the law mandates a misdemeanor if it’s found that she didn’t secure the gun.What are you fishing for? she deserves what the law mandates.
The second amendment states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.No you haven't proven anything
Children have the rights of a prisoner they have nothing more.
When did you disprove the fact children only have the rights of a prisoner? When did it become allowable for children to come and go freely without supervision? When did you prove parents aren't held accountable for the actions of their children?yes I have and why you keep ignoring my points and go off in some lame direction that has nothing to do with human rights,,
So prisoners have a second amendment right?The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
Are you saying you’re ok with infringing on the right of some people not to bear arms?
when have you ever talked about human rights?? youve only talked about priviledges that are not rights,,When did you disprove the fact children only have the rights of a prisoner? When did it become allowable for children to come and go freely without supervision? When did you prove parents aren't held accountable for the actions of their children?
theyve gotten due process rights that caused them to loose that right,,So prisoners have a second amendment right?
And what did I say? What ever the law mandates. A pieces of shit fascist believe they are the soul authority on what is law. They want to make it up as the crime happens. If it's not in the law I don't give a shit about it.Last time I checked, the law mandates a misdemeanor if it’s found that she didn’t secure the gun.
I’m asking if you agree with this punishment or if you think the punishment should be more severe for a person who allows their child to access their gun and shoot someone.
What exactly does shall not be infringed mean to you?So prisoners have a second amendment right?
So if we changed the law to penalize these people with felonies instead of misdemeanors, would you be ok with that?If it's not in the law I don't give a shit about it.
Prisoners have human rights children have human rights neither have anymore rights than the other.when have you ever talked about human rights?? youve only talked about priviledges that are not rights,,
So prisoners have the rights to a gun thanks for pointing that out.What exactly does shall not be infringed mean to you?
Where does it say that it’s acceptable to take their right away if they did something bad?
Red herring basis on speculationSo if we changed the law to penalize these people with felonies instead of misdemeanors, would you be ok with that?
no prisoners' dont have all their human rights while they are in custody,,Prisoners have human rights children have human rights neither have anymore rights than the other.
I’m asking you. Isn’t that what the 2nd amendment states?So prisoners have the rights to a gun thanks for pointing that out.
It’s called a simple question. I’m asking you if you would be ok with this change to that law.Red herring basis on speculation
Prisoners have human rightsno prisoners' dont have all their human rights while they are in custody,,
are you ever going to go through the list of rights listed in the bill of rights and explain in detail how children dont have those rights??
No you aren't asking anything you're making a claim based on a red herring fallacyI’m asking you. Isn’t that what the 2nd amendment states?
youre the only one saying someone doesnt have rights,,Prisoners have human rights
Children don't.
In an anarchy you don't have rights mr anarchist
It's your speculation rephrase your questionIt’s called a simple question. I’m asking you if you would be ok with this change to that law.
I would. Would you?
I am asking something.No you aren't asking anything…
