So Much For Impeachment!

[Siete]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

karma lurks -

 

[harmonica]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

karma lurks -

hahahahhahahah
IT LURKS
hahahahahah

 

[playtime]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

 

[harmonica]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

babble blah blah blah

 

[playtime]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

karma lurks -

hahahahhahahah
IT LURKS
hahahahahah

 

[harmonica]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

karma lurks -

hahahahhahahah
IT LURKS
hahahahahah

but Mr Trump is POTUS...where's the karma?

 

[Rustic]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

karma lurks -

hahahahhahahah
IT LURKS
hahahahahah

meanwhile...

 

[depotoo]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

 

[playtime]

trumpbots are whistling out their ass-

they THUNK they have another winner ..........

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

uh-huh. of course there had to be redactions. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr................ the AG summarized the report & although could request to the court to have the grand jury testimony turned over to congress with all redactions removed. he refused to do so because he's covering for his boss & jr.

so congress went over his head - went straight to the court & petitioned for it themselves. & the court is giving it to them. totally

un

redacted.


nenner neener, & a 3rd neener thrown in for free.

 

[depotoo]

it's a slam dunk like the Russian Collusion
hahahahhahahahahahaha

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

uh-huh. of course there had to be redactions. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr................ the AG summarized the report & although could request to the court to have the grand jury testimony turned over to congress with all redactions removed. he refused to do so because he's covering for his boss & jr.

so congress went over his head - went straight to the court & petitioned for it themselves. & the court is giving it to them. totally

un

redacted.


nenner neener, & a 3rd neener thrown in for free.

Honey, you seem to forget, the report was later released with the redactions they ALL agreed upon, after the summary.

 

[playtime]

& all the grand jury redactions in mueller's report - that barr tried to keep from congress - is going to be revealed as well.

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

uh-huh. of course there had to be redactions. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr................ the AG summarized the report & although could request to the court to have the grand jury testimony turned over to congress with all redactions removed. he refused to do so because he's covering for his boss & jr.

so congress went over his head - went straight to the court & petitioned for it themselves. & the court is giving it to them. totally

un

redacted.


nenner neener, & a 3rd neener thrown in for free.

Honey, you seem to forget, the report was later released with the redactions they ALL agreed upon, after the summary.

actually... sweety... i have not - but you seem to forget that both rosenstein & bob mueller were barr's underlings & had no real choice in the matter. not only could they NOT be insubordinate, but it was illegal to turn over the unredacted grand jury materials without express permission from the court. neither could barr - not that he would have if he legally could.

BUT - a wise judge overruled barr in favor of congress; both because congress has a right to have it ALL when conducting an impeachment inquiry AND because it is of great public interest as to not lose faith in the institutional checks & balances concept based on our constitution. i am sure president transpiracy will have his mooks appeal it & it very well might go to the SC --- but i have full faith the decision to release it to congress will be upheld.

now, this is where i toss a ha ha & tutt tutt in yer general di-rection.

 

[CWayne]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

This is interesting.

Verified how? By the testimony of people giving their opinion? Have we done away with the right to face our accusers? The Whistleblower is the impetus and the main accuser of alleged crimes.

The House doesn't need this whistleblower to impeach, but they will need this person for the trial.

Desire to testify or not, the whistleblower will be required to testify in the Senate.

 

[playtime]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

This is interesting.

Verified how? By the testimony of people giving their opinion? Have we done away with the right to face our accusers? The Whistleblower is the impetus and the main accuser of alleged crimes.

The House doesn't need this whistleblower to impeach, but they will need this person for the trial.

Desire to testify or not, the whistleblower will be required to testify in the Senate.

' Verified how? '

i already told you. the WB gave names of those with first hand knowledge that approached him/her with disturbing info. the IG then interviewed them & they corroborated what was in the original complaint.

so what that the WB - whose identity is concealed thru legal protocol - was the impetus? if i was an informant & gave info that a DA followed up on & it turned out to be credible... the informant is no longer necessary & they themself do not show up in court.

lol, nice try though. the (R)s are trying to put someone - protected by law - in danger all because they wanna stay warm in donny's colon. ya, good luck with that.

Overwhelming Confirmation of Whistleblower Complaint: An Annotation

 

[OldLady]

DEATH penalties for EVERYBODY! (well...democrats anyway)...

HUGE! Suspected ‘Whistleblower’ Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump White House Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Texts!


Whoa! This is earth shattering. No wonder Lying Adam Schiff and his Democrat cohorts don’t want their suspected whistleblower Eric Ciaramella outed to the public. This is because they all know that Ciaramella was in President Trump’s White House and his purpose was specifically to spy on the Trump Administration.



HUGE! Suspected 'Whistleblower' Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump White House Identified as "Charlie" in Strzok and Page Texts!

If you expect anyone to take you seriously, you really need to get out of the fairy tale land of conspiracy theories.

 

[CWayne]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

This is interesting.

Verified how? By the testimony of people giving their opinion? Have we done away with the right to face our accusers? The Whistleblower is the impetus and the main accuser of alleged crimes.

The House doesn't need this whistleblower to impeach, but they will need this person for the trial.

Desire to testify or not, the whistleblower will be required to testify in the Senate.

' Verified how? '

i already told you. the WB gave names of those with first hand knowledge that approached him/her with disturbing info. the IG then interviewed them & they corroborated what was in the original complaint.

so what that the WB - whose identity is concealed thru legal protocol - was the impetus? if i was an informant & gave info that a DA followed up on & it turned out to be credible... the informant is no longer necessary & they themself do not show up in court.

lol, nice try though. the (R)s are trying to put someone - protected by law - in danger all because they wanna stay warm in donny's colon. ya, good luck with that.

Overwhelming Confirmation of Whistleblower Complaint: An Annotation

Given that the IG corroborated information from the transcript of the phone call, a transcript we all have seen, what does that tell you about verified? Again, evidence of wrongdoing is not opinions given by people with concerns. Evidence is a clear understanding of the law, its context, and the hard evidence of behavior that violates that law.

We have not seen anything like that from the IG or the whistleblower.

In fact, given the documented timelines regarding the allegations and the statements by "Involved' parties, we see that the 'concerns' don't rise to the level of criminal conduct.

 

[playtime]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

This is interesting.

Verified how? By the testimony of people giving their opinion? Have we done away with the right to face our accusers? The Whistleblower is the impetus and the main accuser of alleged crimes.

The House doesn't need this whistleblower to impeach, but they will need this person for the trial.

Desire to testify or not, the whistleblower will be required to testify in the Senate.

' Verified how? '

i already told you. the WB gave names of those with first hand knowledge that approached him/her with disturbing info. the IG then interviewed them & they corroborated what was in the original complaint.

so what that the WB - whose identity is concealed thru legal protocol - was the impetus? if i was an informant & gave info that a DA followed up on & it turned out to be credible... the informant is no longer necessary & they themself do not show up in court.

lol, nice try though. the (R)s are trying to put someone - protected by law - in danger all because they wanna stay warm in donny's colon. ya, good luck with that.

Overwhelming Confirmation of Whistleblower Complaint: An Annotation

Given that the IG corroborated information from the transcript of the phone call, a transcript we all have seen, what does that tell you about verified? Again, evidence of wrongdoing is not opinions given by people with concerns. Evidence is a clear understanding of the law, its context, and the hard evidence of behavior that violates that law.

We have not seen anything like that from the IG or the whistleblower.

In fact, given the documented timelines regarding the allegations and the statements by "Involved' parties, we see that the 'concerns' don't rise to the level of criminal conduct.

lol... the thing we all saw isn't a transcript. it's an edited memorandum that donny is trying like hell to peddle as a transcript. & the names given to the IG were given b4 the memo was released.

 

[depotoo]

How do you know it was Barr that redacted them? The Mueller team and fbi worked with them to tell what to redact. Lol
Careful what you wish for...

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

uh-huh. of course there had to be redactions. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr................ the AG summarized the report & although could request to the court to have the grand jury testimony turned over to congress with all redactions removed. he refused to do so because he's covering for his boss & jr.

so congress went over his head - went straight to the court & petitioned for it themselves. & the court is giving it to them. totally

un

redacted.


nenner neener, & a 3rd neener thrown in for free.

Honey, you seem to forget, the report was later released with the redactions they ALL agreed upon, after the summary.

actually... sweety... i have not - but you seem to forget that both rosenstein & bob mueller were barr's underlings & had no real choice in the matter. not only could they NOT be insubordinate, but it was illegal to turn over the unredacted grand jury materials without express permission from the court. neither could barr - not that he would have if he legally could.

BUT - a wise judge overruled barr in favor of congress; both because congress has a right to have it ALL when conducting an impeachment inquiry AND because it is of great public interest as to not lose faith in the institutional checks & balances concept based on our constitution. i am sure president transpiracy will have his mooks appeal it & it very well might go to the SC --- but i have full faith the decision to release it to congress will be upheld.

now, this is where i toss a ha ha & tutt tutt in yer general di-rection.

Rosenstein? And Mueller’s team were for Trump? You can’t be serious? Rosenstein that was willing to wear a wire? And Mueller’s team? You have lost your ever loving mind. They would have done anything to be able to say he had done something illegal! Anything!

 

[Camp]

thunk thunk thunk.... you don't think think think, do ya?

the whistleblower doesn't even need to testify any more any ways. everything he/she has whistled about has been verified & corroborated by multiple first person witness'.

neener neener.

This is interesting.

Verified how? By the testimony of people giving their opinion? Have we done away with the right to face our accusers? The Whistleblower is the impetus and the main accuser of alleged crimes.

The House doesn't need this whistleblower to impeach, but they will need this person for the trial.

Desire to testify or not, the whistleblower will be required to testify in the Senate.

' Verified how? '

i already told you. the WB gave names of those with first hand knowledge that approached him/her with disturbing info. the IG then interviewed them & they corroborated what was in the original complaint.

so what that the WB - whose identity is concealed thru legal protocol - was the impetus? if i was an informant & gave info that a DA followed up on & it turned out to be credible... the informant is no longer necessary & they themself do not show up in court.

lol, nice try though. the (R)s are trying to put someone - protected by law - in danger all because they wanna stay warm in donny's colon. ya, good luck with that.

Overwhelming Confirmation of Whistleblower Complaint: An Annotation

Given that the IG corroborated information from the transcript of the phone call, a transcript we all have seen,

OK, so you are a liar, horribly misinformed, or stupid because you haven't seen the transcript. Trump is hiding it. Why do you think Trump is hiding the transcript?

 

[Thunk]

If you expect anyone to take you seriously, you really need to get out of the fairy tale land of conspiracy theories.

The FBI has already ADMITTED to planing spies into the Trump campaign...But you probably still think it's a "conspiracy theory" that obama armed the mexican drug cartel.

Search on "operation fast & furious" and learn something for once!

 

[playtime]

because barr stated he did the redactions. nice try on yer part. i'm willing to bet that one of them thar names redacted is traitor tot taking the fifth.

Once again, you need to get new sources-
Barr said his department is “well along” making redactions, with the assistance of the special counsel (Mueller), and “there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.”
Justice Department will release Mueller’s report on Russia investigation to the public by ‘mid-April, if not sooner’
Mr. Rosenstein, Mr. Barr, their top advisers and a member of Mr. Mueller’s team have been involved in reviewing the report for material related to intelligence sources, continuing investigations, grand-jury matters and the privacy of individuals not charged with crimes.
Rod Rosenstein Defends Justice Department Handling of Mueller Report

uh-huh. of course there had to be redactions. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr................ the AG summarized the report & although could request to the court to have the grand jury testimony turned over to congress with all redactions removed. he refused to do so because he's covering for his boss & jr.

so congress went over his head - went straight to the court & petitioned for it themselves. & the court is giving it to them. totally

un

redacted.


nenner neener, & a 3rd neener thrown in for free.

Honey, you seem to forget, the report was later released with the redactions they ALL agreed upon, after the summary.

actually... sweety... i have not - but you seem to forget that both rosenstein & bob mueller were barr's underlings & had no real choice in the matter. not only could they NOT be insubordinate, but it was illegal to turn over the unredacted grand jury materials without express permission from the court. neither could barr - not that he would have if he legally could.

BUT - a wise judge overruled barr in favor of congress; both because congress has a right to have it ALL when conducting an impeachment inquiry AND because it is of great public interest as to not lose faith in the institutional checks & balances concept based on our constitution. i am sure president transpiracy will have his mooks appeal it & it very well might go to the SC --- but i have full faith the decision to release it to congress will be upheld.

now, this is where i toss a ha ha & tutt tutt in yer general di-rection.

Rosenstein? And Mueller’s team were for Trump? You can’t be serious? Rosenstein that was willing to wear a wire? And Mueller’s team? You have lost your ever loving mind. They would have done anything to be able to say he had done something illegal! Anything!

i never said they were on trump's team, but thanx for playing the

' i can't comprehend anything not written in sharpie, so i'll just throw out some nonsense & pretend i know what i'm talking about ' game.