LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
How long has the press been far left and how did that happen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How long has the press been far left and how did that happen?
We'll this threads just gone completely off the rails.
How long has the press been far left and how did that happen?
So you are claiming that 80% of the press is non-partisan?
So the lefties are trying to derail Christie's run before it even starts. This could be a huge mistake on their part.
1. The public's attention span is very short.
2. Chris Christie isn't really a conservative and running him off can lead to a real conservative taking his place.
3. Hillery is VERY beatable and he isn't the only one who could do it.
4. Christie is what we call a Progressive Republican, he's not much different from Hillary and if he won he would continue a lot of your agenda.
5. If no link is established between Christie and this "scandal" he will actually gain the experience to handle the mud slinging and trash talking that the left will dish out further down the road.
I don't like Christie, he's a progressive but I saw him speak yesterday for the first time and he has the gift.
Christie is a smart politician. The same as the guy presently in the White House.
The difference is Christie is a no nonsense will tell you things you may not want to hear type. But he will make even the dissenters believe in his policies.
Look, how many governors can take on powerful public employee unions in a union heavy state, and WIN?
Christie id not a true conservative. He is a right wing populist.
And that is what wins in blue states.
Fiscal conservative and social moderate. That is the ticket.
I'd say Christie, should he decide to run for the GOP nomination, will be our next president.
That is if NJ reelecting him in a landslide is any kind of litmus test. If a Republican can get elected in a statewide election in a very blue state, the White House is a strong possibility.
You've got that flipped around. Christie isn't a "populist" at all - the tea party types are the populists.
How long has the press been far left and how did that happen?
So you are claiming that 80% of the press is non-partisan?
Only an idiot would think that I made a claim in that post.
Starting posts with the word "so" is common practice among nutter retards, by the way.
The right did not have to derail Hilary's run for the white house the far left did that for them. The far left decided that a "white" African-American with zero experience was more important to get elected than a "white" female with tons of political baggage.
Although it helps that the far left controls about 80% of the media in this country.
I have a feeling leftist are going to make a run at trumping the GOP with getting the first woman elected President in 2016. Quite frankly, with what the GOP seems to want to offer, more leftists, I think they can succeed.
Immie
Of course that was the plan, the problem is the age of Hilary. Hilary got the SoS position so the DNC could say they got the first African -American elected. Hilary took a back seat to that.
Had they tried to run Hilary 10 years ago she would have had a better chance than she does now.
It does not matter who the GOP puts up for president as the far left press will do it's best to smear them and promote the far left candidate.
Let us all keep in mind Gov. Christie was NOT under oath during the press conference. One in Bridgegate was, and his response was, "On the advice of council, I respectfully decline to answer"; another involved resigned (or was fired) and has made no comments. Let's wait and see if she lands on her feet in a cushy new job, or is blackballed because she did in fact put her boss under the bus.
Completely irrelevant, quit trying to derail the thread.
So you are claiming that 80% of the press is non-partisan?
Only an idiot would think that I made a claim in that post.
Starting posts with the word "so" is common practice among nutter retards, by the way.
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO In other words you are not going to answer the question.
Which proves that you think that 80% of the press is non-partisan. Which truly means it is far left, because only a far left Obama drone would see it that way.
So the lefties are trying to derail Christie's run before it even starts. This could be a huge mistake on their part.
1. The public's attention span is very short.
2. Chris Christie isn't really a conservative and running him off can lead to a real conservative taking his place.
3. Hillery is VERY beatable and he isn't the only one who could do it.
4. Christie is what we call a Progressive Republican, he's not much different from Hillary and if he won he would continue a lot of your agenda.
5. If no link is established between Christie and this "scandal" he will actually gain the experience to handle the mud slinging and trash talking that the left will dish out further down the road.
So the lefties are trying to derail Christie's run before it even starts. This could be a huge mistake on their part.
1. The public's attention span is very short.
2. Chris Christie isn't really a conservative and running him off can lead to a real conservative taking his place.
3. Hillery is VERY beatable and he isn't the only one who could do it.
4. Christie is what we call a Progressive Republican, he's not much different from Hillary and if he won he would continue a lot of your agenda.
5. If no link is established between Christie and this "scandal" he will actually gain the experience to handle the mud slinging and trash talking that the left will dish out further down the road.
I don't like Christie, he's a progressive but I saw him speak yesterday for the first time and he has the gift.
So the lefties are trying to derail Christie's run before it even starts. This could be a huge mistake on their part.
1. The public's attention span is very short.
2. Chris Christie isn't really a conservative and running him off can lead to a real conservative taking his place.
3. Hillery is VERY beatable and he isn't the only one who could do it.
4. Christie is what we call a Progressive Republican, he's not much different from Hillary and if he won he would continue a lot of your agenda.
5. If no link is established between Christie and this "scandal" he will actually gain the experience to handle the mud slinging and trash talking that the left will dish out further down the road.
I don't like Christie, he's a progressive but I saw him speak yesterday for the first time and he has the gift.
Just a quick question.
How long have we on the right been trying to derail Hilary Clinton's bid for the White House?
Edit: whoops I see that has already been brought up.
Immie
yeah keep pushing to the right
You have learned nothing from your election losses
2010 idiot.
yeah keep pushing to the right
You have learned nothing from your election losses
2010 idiot.
First spurious insult from Predfan responding to post #3 in his own thread!
So the lefties are trying to derail Christie's run before it even starts. This could be a huge mistake on their part.
1. The public's attention span is very short.
2. Chris Christie isn't really a conservative and running him off can lead to a real conservative taking his place.
3. Hillery is VERY beatable and he isn't the only one who could do it.
4. Christie is what we call a Progressive Republican, he's not much different from Hillary and if he won he would continue a lot of your agenda.
5. If no link is established between Christie and this "scandal" he will actually gain the experience to handle the mud slinging and trash talking that the left will dish out further down the road.
I don't like Christie, he's a progressive but I saw him speak yesterday for the first time and he has the gift.