So, you want the NRA/pro-gun side to compromise...?

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Sep 26, 2007
38,149
11,160
1,340
Bridge, USS Enterprise
Compromise necessitates that you give a little to get a little, and that you have something to offer that the other side wants.

What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rights side?
 
Last edited:
Loosening up the restrictions on fully automatic weapons would be nice.
 
Compromise necessitates that you give a little to get a little, and that you have something to offer that the other side wants.

What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?

They do, it's called they are not "gunna takkkkkkkkkke yurrrrrrrrrrrr gunnnnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!"

It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.
 
Compromise necessitates that you give a little to get a little, and that you have something to offer that the other side wants.

What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?
They do, it's called they are not "gunna takkkkkkkkkke yurrrrrrrrrrrr gunnnnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!"
It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?
 
I see no point or excuse to give one inch,what possible thing could be changed from the laws we have now that would prevent a single gun death that wouldn't infringe on law abiding people.
 
Compromise necessitates that you give a little to get a little, and that you have something to offer that the other side wants.

What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?
They do, it's called they are not "gunna takkkkkkkkkke yurrrrrrrrrrrr gunnnnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!"
It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?

That they can keep their guns, that's what. All that is being proposed is to strengthen background checks, which 90% of americans support.

If the right wingers fight back against that, it will destroy them in 2014.
 
They do, it's called they are not "gunna takkkkkkkkkke yurrrrrrrrrrrr gunnnnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!"
It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?

That they can keep their guns, that's what. All that is being proposed is to strengthen background checks, which 90% of americans support.

If the right wingers fight back against that, it will destroy them in 2014.

Not acceptable. How about forcing states to follow the 2nd amendment, or cities for that matter?
 
They do, it's called they are not "gunna takkkkkkkkkke yurrrrrrrrrrrr gunnnnnzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!"
It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?
That they can keep their guns...
So, you have nothing to offer other than a promise that you will not take their guns.
That is, you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up.
 
It is so easy to obtain a firearm it's pretty unreal. Private sales don't even require a background check which is outrageous.

as it should be ,why should it be hard to by a tool,what just because its one you don't like? and what is the outrage about private sales you or is your paranoia kicking up again.

These people are the outrageous ones,they cry a sinking ocean about the right taking away rights,when its them that are walking all over them,starting before we are even out of the womb!
 
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?
That they can keep their guns...
So, you have nothing to offer other than a promise that you will not take their guns.
That is, you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up.

If the dems didn't want to compromise, they would go on an all out blitz to bring back the assault weapons ban.

Having gun owners pass a background check before acquiring a firearm is just common sense legislation.

As it sits now, any gang banger, maniac, or other thug can walk into any gun show or through a private sale and obtain firearms, no questions asked.
That is downright nuts and anyone that supports this is even more insane.
 
Lets try this again:
What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rughts side?

That they can keep their guns, that's what. All that is being proposed is to strengthen background checks, which 90% of americans support.

If the right wingers fight back against that, it will destroy them in 2014.
Not acceptable. How about forcing states to follow the 2nd amendment, or cities for that matter?
That is already in the works, now that the 2nd has been incorporated by the 14th amendment.

How about a revision of the 2nd that specifies current SCotUS holdings regarding the protection of the individual right as well as specification as to what constitutes an infringement -- registration, licensing, waiting periods, storage requirements, limits on the number of guns you can buy/have, mandatory training, bans on any sort of firearms or ammunition, taxation of same, etc.

Think the antii-gun/pro gun control side would be willing to give that in exchange for, say, universal background checks?
 
Last edited:
That they can keep their guns...
So, you have nothing to offer other than a promise that you will not take their guns.
That is, you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up.
If the dems didn't want to compromise, they would go on an all out blitz to bring back the assault weapons ban.

Having gun owners pass a background check before acquiring a firearm is just common sense legislation.

As it sits now, any gang banger, maniac, or other thug can walk into any gun show or through a private sale and obtain firearms, no questions asked.

That is downright nuts and anyone that supports this is even more insane.
We have already determined that you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up. Thank you.
 
So, you have nothing to offer other than a promise that you will not take their guns.
That is, you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up.
If the dems didn't want to compromise, they would go on an all out blitz to bring back the assault weapons ban.

Having gun owners pass a background check before acquiring a firearm is just common sense legislation.

As it sits now, any gang banger, maniac, or other thug can walk into any gun show or through a private sale and obtain firearms, no questions asked.

That is downright nuts and anyone that supports this is even more insane.
We have already determined that you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up. Thank you.

That's the problem with you right wingers, all you want is "gimme-gimme-gimme!" and won't give anything back, that is why you got your asses handed to you in 2012.
 
If the dems didn't want to compromise, they would go on an all out blitz to bring back the assault weapons ban.

Having gun owners pass a background check before acquiring a firearm is just common sense legislation.

As it sits now, any gang banger, maniac, or other thug can walk into any gun show or through a private sale and obtain firearms, no questions asked.

That is downright nuts and anyone that supports this is even more insane.
We have already determined that you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up. Thank you.

That's the problem with you right wingers, all you want is "gimme-gimme-gimme!" and won't give anything back, that is why you got your asses handed to you in 2012.
It appears you do not understand the nature of compromise.
If you have nothing to give to them, they then have no reason to give anything up to you.
:dunno:
 
We have already determined that you have nothing to -give- them, and so, there's no reason for them to give anything up. Thank you.

That's the problem with you right wingers, all you want is "gimme-gimme-gimme!" and won't give anything back, that is why you got your asses handed to you in 2012.
It appears you do not understand the nature of compromise.
If you have nothing to give to them, they then have no reason to give anything up to you.
:dunno:

So I take it you support the ability for mental cases and gang bangers to walk into any gun show and walk out with weapons, no questions asked? :cuckoo:
 
That's the problem with you right wingers, all you want is "gimme-gimme-gimme!" and won't give anything back, that is why you got your asses handed to you in 2012.
It appears you do not understand the nature of compromise.
If you have nothing to give to them, they then have no reason to give anything up to you.
:dunno:
So I take it you support the ability for mental cases and gang bangers to walk into any gun show and walk out with weapons, no questions asked? :cuckoo:
I'm sorry - again, it appears you are incapable of discussing this issue like an adult, especially given the fact that you clearly do not understand the nature of compromise.
I'll not waste any more time on you.
 
Last edited:
It appears you do not understand the nature of compromise.
If you have nothing to give to them, they then have no reason to give anything up to you.
:dunno:
So I take it you support the ability for mental cases and gang bangers to walk into any gun show and walk out with weapons, no questions asked? :cuckoo:
I'm sorry - again, it appears you are incapable of discussing this isue like an adult, especially given the fact that you clearly do not understand the nature of compromise.
I'll not waste any more time on you.

In other words "Yes, I fully support convicted felons and gang bangers to have weapons, and I hope they do, just like everyone in america should all own guns at all times, because more guns = more freedom.
What I feel that "compromise" means is that we will be allowed to have rocket launchers and tanks, and maybe give "a lil'" by making it that we can only own 5 rocket launchers and 3 tanks"

:cuckoo:
 
Compromise necessitates that you give a little to get a little, and that you have something to offer that the other side wants.

What does the anti-gun/pro-gun control side have to offer the NRA/pro-gun rights side?

Be careful before they call out Conservatives and demand fire arm owners be well regulated lol.

What would you like?

I want to regulate private sales. Go stand in line for a background check to buy any gun.

Not sure what to.do about the mass murderer nuts who obviously have tough to find mental problems.

Oh, and bring up real criminal prosecution for gun dealers who "let things slide"

Clip bans and the like are mostly lip service like is given to the anti abortion crowd by Republicans.

Could embed the serial number in new receivers. Not going to really solve problems we already have tough.....

Any ideas before we get some half cocked pointless regs?
 

Forum List

Back
Top