Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
Sondlands update had to do with a Sept. meeting, had nothing to do with the time frame of the Jul. call. You commie got nothing.
.
Yep, that quid pro quo demand came well before the aid was released. That's what you meant, isn't it?
Did it??????????? Did I???????? You seem to be the mind reader.
The FACTS ARE, the aid was released in Sept. and no statement was issued by Ukraine.
More facts are coming out concerning the Bidens and the Ukraine ambassador also. During conformation prep the Ambassador was told, if questioned about Hunter Biden, to refer the questioner to the office of the VP. Also shortly after the raid on the owner of Burisma, attorneys for Burisma were contacting the State Dept asking for assistance to help remove the investigations into Burisma. The attorneys invoked Hunter Bidens name as a board member of the company. More is coming from the State Dept as FOIA information is released. I wonder if those attorneys registered as foreign agents? So many questions yet to be answered, maybe the Senate Foreign Relations committee will take it up.
.
You're half-right. I read, but not minds. The aid was released on September 11, after pressure from Republicans and news on Politico. After it became public, it became untenable.
Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
Sondlands update had to do with a Sept. meeting, had nothing to do with the time frame of the Jul. call. You commie got nothing.
.
Yep, that quid pro quo demand came well before the aid was released. That's what you meant, isn't it?
Did it??????????? Did I???????? You seem to be the mind reader.
The FACTS ARE, the aid was released in Sept. and no statement was issued by Ukraine.
More facts are coming out concerning the Bidens and the Ukraine ambassador also. During conformation prep the Ambassador was told, if questioned about Hunter Biden, to refer the questioner to the office of the VP. Also shortly after the raid on the owner of Burisma, attorneys for Burisma were contacting the State Dept asking for assistance to help remove the investigations into Burisma. The attorneys invoked Hunter Bidens name as a board member of the company. More is coming from the State Dept as FOIA information is released. I wonder if those attorneys registered as foreign agents? So many questions yet to be answered, maybe the Senate Foreign Relations committee will take it up.
.
You're half-right. I read, but not minds. The aid was released on September 11, after pressure from Republicans and news on Politico. After it became public, it became untenable.
And?????
Funny how you just ignored the information about the Bidens and the ambassador. It's all been verified by the State Dept, with more to come. Are you afraid to admit there might be a reason for the ambassador being fired and the Bidens investigated?
.
.
When something doesn't happen, there is no corruption.
Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Republicans will argue no matter how bad the evidence is against trumpSondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
Indeed.Isn't it odd how many "rats" Trump has chosen to surround himself with?
Cites for both, please.We know what laws trump broke and we know the evidence against him is overwhelming,
Thats funny funny shit. With the mountains of evidence and witnesses and corroborating evidence. That's funny you guys, no matter what evidence comes out, will say he's innocent. First there was no quid pro quo, then there was, and now it doesn't matter according to you guys.Republicans will argue no matter how bad the evidence is against trumpSondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
This entire topic revolves around the fact there is NO evidence against Trump.
Thats funny funny shit. With the mountains of evidence and witnesses and corroborating evidence. That's funny you guys, no matter what evidence comes out, will say he's innocent. First there was no quid pro quo, then there was, and now it doesn't matter according to you guys.Republicans will argue no matter how bad the evidence is against trumpSondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
This entire topic revolves around the fact there is NO evidence against Trump.
Well, we already know nothing he does will offend you. But you are dead wrong. The man is guilty and should be removed from office. We know Republicans won't so he can stay until we vote him out in 2020. That's fine. Don't count on voters punishing us for impeaching him because he's guilty as fuck.
majority of independent voters who do not lean Republican or Democrat think that President Donald Trump should be impeached, according to a new poll.
An NBC News/SurveyMonkey survey released Friday showed that 53 percent of independent voters supported impeaching Trump while 44 percent said he shouldn't be impeached.
And the 44% have been listening to too much corporate media. Of course he should be impeached.
Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Cite your sources and quote the evidence.Thats funny funny shit. With the mountains of evidence and witnesses and corroborating evidence.Republicans will argue no matter how bad the evidence is against trumpSondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
This entire topic revolves around the fact there is NO evidence against Trump.
Cite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Thats funny funny shit. With the mountains of evidence and witnesses and corroborating evidence. That's funny you guys, no matter what evidence comes out, will say he's innocent. First there was no quid pro quo, then there was, and now it doesn't matter according to you guys.Republicans will argue no matter how bad the evidence is against trumpSondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Sondland Updates Impeachment Testimony, Describing Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Is that the walls closing in on the White House?
This entire topic revolves around the fact there is NO evidence against Trump.
Well, we already know nothing he does will offend you. But you are dead wrong. The man is guilty and should be removed from office. We know Republicans won't so he can stay until we vote him out in 2020. That's fine. Don't count on voters punishing us for impeaching him because he's guilty as fuck.
majority of independent voters who do not lean Republican or Democrat think that President Donald Trump should be impeached, according to a new poll.
An NBC News/SurveyMonkey survey released Friday showed that 53 percent of independent voters supported impeaching Trump while 44 percent said he shouldn't be impeached.
And the 44% have been listening to too much corporate media. Of course he should be impeached.
Bazinga!
Cite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Cite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Trump sets foreign diplomacy,, not libtards lolCite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Google House of Representatives. That's my source.
And no amount of evidence will convince you so why would I even bother? Fact is 55% of independents think he should be impeached. 40% say not. 5% are living under rocks.
As expected - you can neither cite your sources nor quote the evidence.Google House of Representatives. That's my source.Cite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
As expected - you can neither cite your sources nor quote the evidence.Source House Of RepesentativesCite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Evidence : The facts. My eyes. My ears.
Ok who didn’t tell bobo trump released the transcript!? LolCite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.I think trump wanted to hold the payment lol
Source House Of Repesentatives
Evidence : The facts. My eyes. My ears.
How many people have to come out and say what Trump did was wrong? It wasn't just the whistleblower.
You want evidence? Trump's new spokesman who took over for Sarah Huckabee Sanders got up on national fucking tv and admitted it.
Rudy probably admitted it.
That former decorated military man came in to testify.
Many many many people listening in shreeked when they heard Trump trying to extort the Ukranian president.
Trump sets foreign diplomacy,, not libtards lolCite your sources and quote the evidence.It's obvious. How much more obvious does it have to get?Unsupportable nonsense.Until he got something PERSONALLY.
Google House of Representatives. That's my source.
And no amount of evidence will convince you so why would I even bother? Fact is 55% of independents think he should be impeached. 40% say not. 5% are living under rocks.
