Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it's not the truth. It's like saying less than 0.1% of people who fly each year will die, when the truth is the number that will die is so much smaller you can't even see it from 0.1%. Use Accurate Numbers, that is how you tell the truth.0.1 is an enormous number compared to the truth you damn fool. Use Accurate Numbers.0.1! Stop using such a utterly inaccurate figure you damn dummy.A very small fucking number so stop using a vastly larger one.
I said it was less than 0.1%. What "vastly larger one" did I use?
WTF????
I am using 0.1%.
If you divide 32,000 by 65,000,000 you get 0.000492308.
What larger number am I using? When using the answer above as a percentage you move the decimal point two places to the right.
I said it amounted to less than 0.1%. That is the truth.
The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?Those numbers are not even on the same planet let alone in the same neighborhood. Use Accurate Numbers, period.It does matter because it's fucking dumb. Do the fucking math for once.Does not matter at all. The number, 0.0492308%, is smaller than 0.1%. Which is exactly what I said.
You fucking retard. I did the math. I made the statement that the number is less than 0.1%. You claimed I suck at math and that I should divide 32,000 by 65,000,000. I did and the number, 0.0492308%, is less than 0.1%, just as I stated.
Which numbers??? You said divide 32,000 by 65 million.
I originally stated all murders, accidental shooting deaths and gun suicides. That would be 9,200 + 800 + 32,000. Which equals 42,000. If you divide 42,000 by 65 million you get 0.000646154 or 0.0646154%. And my original point still stands.
No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.No, they cannot be, ever.The deaths and injuries due to accidental shootings could be emilinated if everyone followed basic safety rules.
Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
No it's not the truth. It's like saying less than 0.1% of people who fly each year will die, when the truth is the number that will die is so much smaller you can't even see it from 0.1%. Use Accurate Numbers, that is how you tell the truth.0.1 is an enormous number compared to the truth you damn fool. Use Accurate Numbers.0.1! Stop using such a utterly inaccurate figure you damn dummy.I said it was less than 0.1%. What "vastly larger one" did I use?
WTF????
I am using 0.1%.
If you divide 32,000 by 65,000,000 you get 0.000492308.
What larger number am I using? When using the answer above as a percentage you move the decimal point two places to the right.
I said it amounted to less than 0.1%. That is the truth.
The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?Those numbers are not even on the same planet let alone in the same neighborhood. Use Accurate Numbers, period.It does matter because it's fucking dumb. Do the fucking math for once.
You fucking retard. I did the math. I made the statement that the number is less than 0.1%. You claimed I suck at math and that I should divide 32,000 by 65,000,000. I did and the number, 0.0492308%, is less than 0.1%, just as I stated.
Which numbers??? You said divide 32,000 by 65 million.
I originally stated all murders, accidental shooting deaths and gun suicides. That would be 9,200 + 800 + 32,000. Which equals 42,000. If you divide 42,000 by 65 million you get 0.000646154 or 0.0646154%. And my original point still stands.
Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.No, they cannot be, ever.The deaths and injuries due to accidental shootings could be emilinated if everyone followed basic safety rules.
Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?Those numbers are not even on the same planet let alone in the same neighborhood. Use Accurate Numbers, period.You fucking retard. I did the math. I made the statement that the number is less than 0.1%. You claimed I suck at math and that I should divide 32,000 by 65,000,000. I did and the number, 0.0492308%, is less than 0.1%, just as I stated.
Which numbers??? You said divide 32,000 by 65 million.
I originally stated all murders, accidental shooting deaths and gun suicides. That would be 9,200 + 800 + 32,000. Which equals 42,000. If you divide 42,000 by 65 million you get 0.000646154 or 0.0646154%. And my original point still stands.
Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
Your math sucks because you are using a number vastly larger than the truth, which means you are not telling the truth and not doing the math. 0.1 is a huge number when compared to the actual number.No it's not the truth. It's like saying less than 0.1% of people who fly each year will die, when the truth is the number that will die is so much smaller you can't even see it from 0.1%. Use Accurate Numbers, that is how you tell the truth.0.1 is an enormous number compared to the truth you damn fool. Use Accurate Numbers.0.1! Stop using such a utterly inaccurate figure you damn dummy.
WTF????
I am using 0.1%.
If you divide 32,000 by 65,000,000 you get 0.000492308.
What larger number am I using? When using the answer above as a percentage you move the decimal point two places to the right.
I said it amounted to less than 0.1%. That is the truth.
Is it less than 0.1%?? If so, it is the truth.
What happened is that you thought you caught me at bad math, and when you realized I was right you decided to push this nonsense.
That would not be hard at all, if I cared that much, and I don't.No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.No, they cannot be, ever.The deaths and injuries due to accidental shootings could be emilinated if everyone followed basic safety rules.
Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
Bullshit. Care to post an accidental shooting circumstance that cannot be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules?
Your math sucks because you are using a number vastly larger than the truth, which means you are not telling the truth and not doing the math. 0.1 is a hug number when compared to the actual number.No it's not the truth. It's like saying less than 0.1% of people who fly each year will die, when the truth is the number that will die is so much smaller you can't even see it from 0.1%. Use Accurate Numbers, that is how you tell the truth.0.1 is an enormous number compared to the truth you damn fool. Use Accurate Numbers.WTF????
I am using 0.1%.
If you divide 32,000 by 65,000,000 you get 0.000492308.
What larger number am I using? When using the answer above as a percentage you move the decimal point two places to the right.
I said it amounted to less than 0.1%. That is the truth.
Is it less than 0.1%?? If so, it is the truth.
What happened is that you thought you caught me at bad math, and when you realized I was right you decided to push this nonsense.
Deaths attributed to firearms US currently. All deaths. 22,000 suicides, 800 accidents, and ~10,000 murders = 32,000. Look It Up and Do The Math, I'm not telling you again.The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?Those numbers are not even on the same planet let alone in the same neighborhood. Use Accurate Numbers, period.
Which numbers??? You said divide 32,000 by 65 million.
I originally stated all murders, accidental shooting deaths and gun suicides. That would be 9,200 + 800 + 32,000. Which equals 42,000. If you divide 42,000 by 65 million you get 0.000646154 or 0.0646154%. And my original point still stands.
Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
What number is 32,000??
That would not be hard at all, if I cared that much, and I don't.No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.No, they cannot be, ever.The deaths and injuries due to accidental shootings could be emilinated if everyone followed basic safety rules.
Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
Bullshit. Care to post an accidental shooting circumstance that cannot be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules?
Deaths attributed to firearms US currently. All deaths. 22,000 suicides, 800 accidents, and ~10,000 murders = 32,000. Look It Up and Do The Math, I'm not telling you again.The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?Which numbers??? You said divide 32,000 by 65 million.
I originally stated all murders, accidental shooting deaths and gun suicides. That would be 9,200 + 800 + 32,000. Which equals 42,000. If you divide 42,000 by 65 million you get 0.000646154 or 0.0646154%. And my original point still stands.
Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
What number is 32,000??
No, it doesn't. Start here: 13 of the Most Tragic and Horrifying Gun Accidents in 2014 AlternetThat would not be hard at all, if I cared that much, and I don't.No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.No, they cannot be, ever.
Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
Bullshit. Care to post an accidental shooting circumstance that cannot be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules?
LMAO!! So it would be easy to refute my claim, but you don't want to do so. lol
I guess my claim stands then.
You are mixing people up. I never use any number higher than 32,000, because that, unlike your numbers, is the accurate one.Deaths attributed to firearms US currently. All deaths. 22,000 suicides, 800 accidents, and ~10,000 murders = 32,000. Look It Up and Do The Math, I'm not telling you again.The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.The number is currently 32,000, not 42,000 for one. And the .00 whatever is the number you should use, and no other. Got it now, dummy?
Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
What number is 32,000??
I used 32,000 several times, and you ranted about it not being accurate. I boosted the numbers in your favor, and you still bitch?
I stated that it was less than 0.1%. It is. Case closed.
No, it doesn't. Start here: 13 of the Most Tragic and Horrifying Gun Accidents in 2014 AlternetThat would not be hard at all, if I cared that much, and I don't.No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.Yes they can. The every accidental shooting death or injury can be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules.
Bullshit. Care to post an accidental shooting circumstance that cannot be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules?
LMAO!! So it would be easy to refute my claim, but you don't want to do so. lol
I guess my claim stands then.
You are mixing people up. I never use any number higher than 32,000, because that, unlike your numbers, is the accurate one.Deaths attributed to firearms US currently. All deaths. 22,000 suicides, 800 accidents, and ~10,000 murders = 32,000. Look It Up and Do The Math, I'm not telling you again.The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.Can you read??? The 42,000 is a combination of gun suicides, gun murders, and accidental shooting deaths.
If I were listing the actual number, I would use it. But I made teh statement that all of those gun deaths are less than 0.1%. It is a valid comparison and you are simply being obtuse to argue it.
What number is 32,000??
I used 32,000 several times, and you ranted about it not being accurate. I boosted the numbers in your favor, and you still bitch?
I stated that it was less than 0.1%. It is. Case closed.
Where's the rule that says you don't let an 8-year-old with a gun instructor standing beside her fire an Uzi at a gun range? Or the one that says you can't carry a gun in your pants?No, it doesn't. Start here: 13 of the Most Tragic and Horrifying Gun Accidents in 2014 AlternetThat would not be hard at all, if I cared that much, and I don't.No, that is also not true, but it sounds good to you so there you go.
Bullshit. Care to post an accidental shooting circumstance that cannot be, at least partially, attributed to failure to follow basic gun safety rules?
LMAO!! So it would be easy to refute my claim, but you don't want to do so. lol
I guess my claim stands then.
Yes it does. Here are the basic safety rules: http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/GunSafety.pdf
Each of those tragic shooting could have been prevented if the gun owners followed the rules listed there.
For example, the woman who shot herself in the car "1) Woman Preparing to Shoot Ferguson Protesters Accidentally Shoots Self", broke several rules. I-1.Always point the muzzle in
a safe direction; never point a firearm at anyone or anything you don't want to shoot.
2.Keep your finger off the trigger and outside the trigger guard until you are ready to shoot.
3.Keep the action open and the gun unloaded until you are ready to use it.
and
II-6. Never joke around or engage in horseplay while handling or using firearms.
The rest also could have only happened if the basic safety rules were broken.
No, it's not accurate you fucking dummy. The real number is the "accurate" one. Yours is bullshit. It's like saying less than 50% of teenage girls get pregnant each year, when the accurate number is 1/10 of that.You are mixing people up. I never use any number higher than 32,000, because that, unlike your numbers, is the accurate one.Deaths attributed to firearms US currently. All deaths. 22,000 suicides, 800 accidents, and ~10,000 murders = 32,000. Look It Up and Do The Math, I'm not telling you again.The number is 32,000 dumbass. Look it up, use accurate numbers, and do the fucking math for once.
What number is 32,000??
I used 32,000 several times, and you ranted about it not being accurate. I boosted the numbers in your favor, and you still bitch?
I stated that it was less than 0.1%. It is. Case closed.
Yep, and my statement that the 32,000 was less than 1/10th of 1% was accurate.
