Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
You need to learn to use words properly. Women don't get all dressed up, take their guns, and go out into the woods to have an abortion, then donate the meat because it wasn't for food in the first place.No, that's not sport. But it is unnecessary most of the time and you want to ban it, just like I want to ban guns. See how that works?Yep, because it's not for sport and it doesn't kill a living thing, it kills a potential living thing. Big difference.
When over 90% are because the person doesn't want to be pregnant despite havingn done what it takes, it's sport.
Whether or not it kills a living thing is your opinoin.
When they do it for those reasons, it's sport.
I don't care how many abortions someone has as long as they pay or if they choose to not have one, support their own damn kids. If the abortion causes medical problems they can't fund, not my problem. If they have kids they can't support, not my problem. If they make the choice, they pay the price even if it's the ultimate one.
And with, I've gotta run. Nice debating with you little gun nuts.
Although I personally think abortion is a much more disgusting act than owning a weapon, I do not want to ban it. What I would like to see is more education regarding the options if you get pregnant, and the importance of using protection, double protection if necessary. I can be realistic and realize that people are not going to stop having sex, that unplanned and unwanted pregnancies are going to happen, and that if abortion is banned, some women will find a way to get them done anyways.
I'm all for them using protection. The problem is too many think that the decision they make to have sex, one they say is no ones else's business, is one they think someone else should provide the protection in order for it be safer for them.
Buy 'em coathangers.